Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Martínez-Jurado, José Moyano-Fuentes (2014)
Lean Management, Supply Chain Management and Sustainability: A Literature ReviewJournal of Cleaner Production, 85
Sufian Qrunfleh, Monideepa Tarafdar (2013)
Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic supplier partnership and postponementSupply Chain Management, 18
K. Govindan, S. Azevedo, H. Carvalho, V. Cruz-Machado (2013)
Lean, green and resilient practices influence on supply chain performance: interpretive structural modeling approachInternational Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 12
H. Håkansson, I. Snehota (1989)
No business is an island: The network concept of business strategyScandinavian Journal of Management, 5
H. Håkansson, G. Persson (2004)
Supply Chain Management: The Logic of Supply Chains and NetworksThe International Journal of Logistics Management, 15
D. Ford (1980)
The Development of Buyer‐Seller Relationships in Industrial MarketsEuropean Journal of Marketing, 14
J. Dyer, Kentaro Nobeoka (2000)
Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota caseStrategic Management Journal, 21
Satish Singh, Shashank Pandey (2015)
Lean Supply-Chain:A State-of-the-art Literature Review, 4
N. Jasti, R. Kodali (2015)
Lean production: literature review and trendsInternational Journal of Production Research, 53
P. Ugochukwu, Jon Engström, Jostein Langstrand (2012)
Lean in the Supply Chain: A Literature ReviewManagement and Production Engineering Review, 3
J. Liker, Thomas Choi (2004)
Building deep supplier relationshipsHarvard Business Review, 82
R. McIvor (2001)
Lean supply: the design and cost reduction dimensionsEuropean Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 7
P. Olsen (2013)
IMP theory in light of process- and system theories
Maike Scherrer-Rathje, Todd Boyle, Patricia Deflorin (2009)
Lean, take two! Reflections from the second attempt at lean implementationBusiness Horizons, 52
Rachna Shah, Peter Ward (2007)
Defining and developing measures of lean productionJournal of Operations Management, 25
P. Hines, M. Holweg, Nick Rich (2004)
Learning to evolve: A review of contemporary lean thinkingInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24
N. Jasti, R. Kodali (2015)
A critical review of lean supply chain management frameworks: proposed frameworkProduction Planning & Control, 26
M. Sako (2004)
Supplier development at Honda, Nissan and Toyota: comparative case studies of organizational capability enhancementIndustrial and Corporate Change, 13
J. Benders, M. Bijsterveld (2000)
Leaning on lean: the reception of a management fashion in GermanyNew Technology Work and Employment, 15
W. Hopp, M. Spearman (2004)
To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question?Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag., 6
E. Martinelli, A. Tunisini, S. Guercini (2017)
Customer-driven supply chains under IMP lensThe iMP Journal, 11
Torbjørn Netland, D. Powell (2016)
A Lean World
J. Naylor, M. Naim, D. Berry (1999)
Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chainInternational Journal of Production Economics, 62
P. Hines, Nick Rich, A. Esain (1998)
Creating a lean supplier network: a distribution industry caseEuropean Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 4
Lars-Erik Gadde (2018)
Purchasing management and the role of uncertainty
The purpose of this paper is to discuss key elements of lean supply (LS) in light of core concepts in the Industrial Marketing and Purchasing Group (IMP) perspective.Design/methodology/approachFirst, the authors examine the literature on LS and identify and discuss important characteristics and key elements of LS. Second, the authors present key concepts in the IMP Perspective, in particular the dyad versus network levels, and the ARA model, capturing activities, resources, and actors. Third, the authors cross-fertilize the concepts from these two streams of research.FindingsThe authors identify 12 key LS elements. Relating these to core IMP frameworks, they identify areas of LS that can be expanded. First, the authors found that key elements in LS mainly focus on the dyadic level and that the network level is addressed to a much lesser extent and primarily captures serial “chain” connections among relationships. Second, it was found that key elements in LS predominantly focus on the activity layer and pay much less attention to resources and actors.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors suggest that LS theory and practice can benefit from taking a network perspective, and by paying more attention to resource and actor concepts and issues. The study is purely theoretical.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, no previous studies combine LS and the IMP perspective. The authors add to LS by elaborating how 12 key elements in LS can be expanded.
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 8, 2020
Keywords: Lean production; Networks; Business relationships; Lean supply; Supplier activities
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.