Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Brown, L. Marchant
Best Interests Decision Making in Complex Cases
(2011)
2011),Best Interests Decision Making in Complex Cases, available at: www
K. Keywood (2010)
Vulnerable adults, mental capacity and social care refusal.Medical law review, 18 1
A. Holland, J. Wong (1999)
Genetically determined obesity in Prader-Willi syndrome: the ethics and legality of treatment.Journal of Medical Ethics, 25
G. Murphy (2006)
Assessment of Capacity in Adults: Interim Guidance for Psychologists
Peter Scourfield (2010)
Reflections on the serious case review of a female adult (JK)The Journal of Adult Protection, 12
Nasir Naqvi, B. Shiv, A. Bechara (2006)
The Role of Emotion in Decision MakingCurrent Directions in Psychological Science, 15
S. Grant, Jennie Lewis (1988)
Community living for people with disabilities
H. Brown
Community Living for People with Disabilities in Need of a High Level of Support
(1996)
Joe: The Only Boy in the World, Profile Books, London
M. Blastland
Joe: The Only Boy in the World
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the way that practitioners apply the 2005 Mental Capacity Act (MCA) in complex cases involving people with learning disabilities who cannot make some key decisions by themselves. Like many qualitative studies it began with a felt sense that practitioners were struggling to apply the clear framework set out in the Act to real life situations, and that some of the decisions they were faced with did not fit neatly into the linear, cognitive model of decision making set out in the MCA and its accompanying guidance. Design/methodology/approach – The study was conducted under the aegis of the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) during 2010‐2011. A number of “complex” cases were obtained from Social Services, Primary Care Trusts and other organisations and subjected to thematic analysis. The current paper focuses on the 16 cases that involved people with learning disabilities. Findings – A number of issues were identified that underlay the complexity of the cases examined. The cases drew attention, in particular, to the way in which practitioners were confronted with mounting concerns as opposed to single, discrete decisions, with the risk that decisions could be delayed until positive choices were much less available. Originality/value – The aim of the study was to support the use of the Act in these situations and to give practitioners confidence in applying its principles across a wide range of diverse circumstances. Although the original study specifically related to the English legislation, the factors that led people to consider a case “complex” would apply equally in other jurisdictions. The study also shed light on difficulties that arise when intervening in less formal ways.
Tizard Learning Disability Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 5, 2013
Keywords: England; Legislation; Learning disabilities; Social care; Mental Capacity Act; Best interests decision making; Complex cases
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.