Using rubrics to assess information literacy

Using rubrics to assess information literacy Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report the results of an assessment study of undergraduate students' achievement of information literacy learning outcomes in a first‐year research and writing course. Design/methodology/approach – The object of the assessment was a group of bibliographies compiled by the students. The librarian and other faculty members created a scoring rubric based on course learning objectives and the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. The rubric was used to score the bibliographies to determine the students' levels of mastery of the objectives, their use of library‐licensed vs freely available web sources, and differences among the classroom learning environments. Findings – The paper finds that students' academic work is a useful gauge of their achievement of information literacy‐based learning outcomes. A rubric is a valuable assessment tool that provides a reliable and objective method for analysis and comparison. Research limitations/implications – Research in assessment offers libraries the opportunity to measure their contribution to the educational missions of their institutions. As there is no “one size fits all” in assessment, it is important to explore and publish a variety of assessment approaches to expand this area of knowledge. Practical implications – The results of this study led to certain changes in the library's delivery of instruction. Dissemination of the results may also prompt more widespread acceptance of the role of information literacy in higher education. Other libraries may find additional applications for this assessment approach. Originality/value – This paper contributes to the base of empirical research about library instruction, information literacy, and assessment using the ACRL Standards. Although other information literacy rubrics exist, there is a shortage of publications that report the results of their application to student academic work. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Reference Services Review Emerald Publishing

Using rubrics to assess information literacy

Reference Services Review, Volume 34 (1): 13 – Jan 1, 2006

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/using-rubrics-to-assess-information-literacy-zrRMLUVDf5
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0090-7324
DOI
10.1108/00907320610640752
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report the results of an assessment study of undergraduate students' achievement of information literacy learning outcomes in a first‐year research and writing course. Design/methodology/approach – The object of the assessment was a group of bibliographies compiled by the students. The librarian and other faculty members created a scoring rubric based on course learning objectives and the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education. The rubric was used to score the bibliographies to determine the students' levels of mastery of the objectives, their use of library‐licensed vs freely available web sources, and differences among the classroom learning environments. Findings – The paper finds that students' academic work is a useful gauge of their achievement of information literacy‐based learning outcomes. A rubric is a valuable assessment tool that provides a reliable and objective method for analysis and comparison. Research limitations/implications – Research in assessment offers libraries the opportunity to measure their contribution to the educational missions of their institutions. As there is no “one size fits all” in assessment, it is important to explore and publish a variety of assessment approaches to expand this area of knowledge. Practical implications – The results of this study led to certain changes in the library's delivery of instruction. Dissemination of the results may also prompt more widespread acceptance of the role of information literacy in higher education. Other libraries may find additional applications for this assessment approach. Originality/value – This paper contributes to the base of empirical research about library instruction, information literacy, and assessment using the ACRL Standards. Although other information literacy rubrics exist, there is a shortage of publications that report the results of their application to student academic work.

Journal

Reference Services ReviewEmerald Publishing

Published: Jan 1, 2006

Keywords: Information literacy; Assessment; Higher education; Academic libraries; Undergraduates; Library instruction

References

  • Educative Assessment
    Wiggins, G.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off