Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Andersson, H. Eriksson, H. Torstensson (2006)
Similarities and differences between TQM, six sigma and leanThe Tqm Magazine, 18
Benny Tjahjono, P. Ball, V. Vitanov, C. Scorzafave, J. Nogueira, J. Calleja, M. Minguet, L. Narasimha, A. Rivas, A. Srivastava, S. Srivastava, A. Yadav (2010)
Six Sigma: a literature reviewInternational Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1
H. Arkes (1993)
Some practical judgment and decision-making research.
Andrew Lo, Dmitry Repin, B. Steenbarger (2004)
Fear and Greed in Financial Markets : A Clinical Study of Day-Traders ∗
E. Junarsin (2013)
The Characteristics of Fund Holdings and Performance with Characteristic-Based Benchmarks: A Study on Mutual Funds in the United StatesThe International Journal of Management, 30
Michael Pompian (2006)
Behavioral Finance and Wealth Management
R. Gapp, R. Fisher, Kaoru Kobayashi (2008)
Implementing 5S within a Japanese context: an integrated management systemManagement Decision, 46
Edward Arnheiter, J. Maleyeff (2005)
The integration of lean management and Six SigmaThe Tqm Magazine, 17
William Wright, G. Bower (1992)
Mood effects on subjective probability assessmentOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52
(1974)
Heuristics and Biases
D. Kahneman, A. Tversky (1979)
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47
W. Sharpe (1964)
CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK*Journal of Finance, 19
Souraj Salah, A. Rahim, J. Carretero (2010)
The integration of Six Sigma and lean managementInternational Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1
J. Forgas (1995)
Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM).Psychological bulletin, 117 1
Ivan Grgurić (2010)
The myth of the rational market / Justin Fox. New York: HarperCollins, 2009.Financial theory and practice, 34
A. Paul (1965)
SAMUELSON, . Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly, Industrial Management Review, ., 6
R. Snee (2010)
Lean Six Sigma – getting better all the timeInternational Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1
D. Ariely (2008)
Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions
E. Fama (1965)
Random Walks in Stock Market PricesFinancial Analysts Journal, 21
P. Samuelson (2015)
Proof that Properly Anticipated Prices Fluctuate Randomly
Daniel Ball, J. Maleyeff (2003)
Lean Management of Environmental ConsultingJournal of Management in Engineering, 19
Matthew Pepper, T. Spedding (2010)
The evolution of lean Six SigmaInternational Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27
F. Black, Robert Litterman (1992)
Global Portfolio OptimizationFinancial Analysts Journal, 48
For personal use only – not for distribution. Risk as Feelings
D. Nevins (2004)
Goals-Based Investing, 6
M. Shabbir, A. Kaleem, Shabana Kirmani, Imran Qureshi (2011)
Customers' perceptions towards adoption of e-banking in PakistanInternational Journal of Economics and Business Research, 3
R. Tindale, J. Davis, D. Vollrath, D. Nagao (1990)
Asymmetrical Social Influence in Freely Interacting Groups: A Test of Three ModelsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58
D. Goldstein, Eric Johnson, W. Sharpe (2008)
Choosing Outcomes Versus Choosing Products: Consumer-Focused Retirement Investment AdviceMicroeconomics: Intertemporal Choice & Growth eJournal
A. Crathorne, W. Shewhart (1933)
Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product.American Mathematical Monthly, 40
J. Womack, Daniel Jones, D. Roos (1990)
The machine that changed the world : based on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 5-million dollar 5-year study on the future of the automobile
R. Mclean (2007)
Capital Ideas EvolvingBusiness Economics, 44
Purpose – This paper aims to use Lean Six Sigma (LSS) and consumption mapping concepts to develop a disciplined methodology for a self-directed investor so that adverse decision-making behaviors are avoided. Classical financial theories assume that individuals maximize expected utility by arriving at financial decisions in a rational manner. But, over time, investor performance has lagged behind corresponding market performance. Despite these results and research on their causes, investors continue to repeat systematic mistakes leading to suboptimal financial outcomes. Design/methodology/approach – Consumption maps are developed based on behavioral finance research that shows why investors make predictable and costly errors in their decision making. The authors show that the contemporary methodologies within LSS, used successfully in the manufacturing and service sectors, can be used to enforce rationality in investing. Findings – The approach proposed herein provides a new framework that researchers should be able to test in practice. By applying a structured, disciplined approach based on the Design-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control (DMAIC) methodology of LSS, it is posited that the gap between financial theory and actual results can be bridged. Originality/value – Rather than hoping to avoid irrational behavior through self-awareness of behavioral biases, the DMAIC approach will standardize self-directed investor decision-making so that discipline is enforced.
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 2, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.