Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Hee-Woong Kim, A. Kankanhalli (2009)
Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo bias perspectiveManagement Information Systems Quarterly, 33
Anol Bhattacherjee, G. Premkumar (2004)
Understanding Changes in Belief and Attitude Toward Information Technology Usage: A Theoretical Model and Longitudinal TestMIS Q., 28
E. Kossek (1989)
THE ACCEPTANCE OF HUMAN RESOURCE INNOVATION BY MULTIPLE CONSTITUENCIESPersonnel Psychology, 42
V. Wickramasinghe, Vathsala Gunawardena (2010)
Critical elements that discriminate between successful and unsuccessful ERP implementations in Sri LankaJ. Enterp. Inf. Manag., 23
Sung Kim, N. Malhotra (2005)
A Longitudinal Model of Continued IS Use: An Integrative View of Four Mechanisms Underlying Postadoption PhenomenaManag. Sci., 51
R. Oliver (1980)
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction DecisionsJournal of Marketing Research, 17
S. Petter, William DeLone, E. McLean (1992)
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent VariablesJournal of Management Information Systems, 29
Frank Lin, C. Rohm (2009)
Managers' and end-users' concerns on innovation implementation: A case of an ERP implementation in ChinaBus. Process. Manag. J., 15
Sue Abdinnou, K. Saeed (2008)
Comparison Of Users’ Perceptions In The Pre- And Post- ERP Implementation Phases
Hsiao-Lan Wei, Eric Wang, Pei-Hung Ju (2005)
Understanding misalignment and cascading change of ERP implementation: a stage view of process analysisEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 14
R. González, J. Gascó, Juan Llopis (2010)
Information systems outsourcing: a Delphi study from SpainBus. Process. Manag. J., 16
Pantelis Longinidis, Katerina Gotzamani (2009)
ERP user satisfaction issues: insights from a Greek industrial giantInd. Manag. Data Syst., 109
E. Kossek, W. Young, D. Gash, Victor Nichol (1994)
Waiting for innovation in the human resources department: Godot implements a human resource information systemHuman Resource Management, 33
Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah (2004)
ERP implementation factors: A comparison of managerial and end-user perspectivesBus. Process. Manag. J., 10
William DeLone, E. McLean (2003)
The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year UpdateJ. Manag. Inf. Syst., 19
K. Saeed (2012)
Evaluating the value of collaboration systems in collocated teams: A longitudinal analysisComput. Hum. Behav., 28
C. Soh, S. Kien (2005)
The Challenges of Implementing "Vanilla" Versions of Enterprise SystemsMIS Q. Executive, 4
Olivier Françoise, M. Bourgault, R. Pellerin (2009)
ERP implementation through critical success factors' managementBus. Process. Manag. J., 15
B. Schlichter, Pernille Kræmmergaard (2010)
A comprehensive literature review of the ERP research field over a decadeJ. Enterp. Inf. Manag., 23
Sandra Fisher, Ann Howell (2004)
Beyond user acceptance: An examination of employee reactions to information technology systemsHuman Resource Management, 43
Eric Lim, S. Pan, Chee‐Wee Tan (2005)
Managing user acceptance towards enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems – understanding the dissonance between user expectations and managerial policiesEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 14
Sue Abdinnour-Helm, M. Lengnick-Hall, C. Lengnick-Hall (2003)
Pre-implementation attitudes and organizational readiness for implementing an Enterprise Resource Planning systemEur. J. Oper. Res., 146
W. Orlikowski, D. Gash (1994)
Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizationsACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 12
Y. Moon (2007)
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): a review of the literatureInternational Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 4
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore how key users’ perceptions (capability, value, timing, and acceptance) toward an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system change from the pre-implementation to the post-implementation phase. The paper also examines how this change differs with varying levels of user involvement in the implementation process and users’ positions in the company. Design/methodology/approach – The authors survey the employees of a major aircraft manufacturing company in the Midwest and analyze the data using repeated measures ANOVA. The authors use time as a within-subject independent variable, and involvement/position at the company as between-subject independent variables. Findings – The results reveal a significant drop in users’ perceptions regarding the capability, value, and implementation timing of the ERP system. However, the perception of acceptance did not change significantly. Furthermore, there were more significant interactions of users’ perceptions with employee position than employee involvement in the implementation process. Research limitations/implications – The study offers a better theoretical understanding of how users’ perceptions regarding an ERP system evolve over time. The use of one company is a limitation of the study, so future research can focus on extending the study in different sectors. Practical implications – Management can design interventions to minimize users’ negative perceptions about the ERP system and increase usage in the post-implementation phase. For example, management can design training customized toward users’ positions in the company. Originality/value – Post-implementation research in the ERP field is rare. Conducting a survey of users’ perceptions allows the authors to take an in-depth look at attitudes toward an ERP system.
Journal of Enterprise Information Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 2, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.