Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Alberic Pater, K. Lierop (2006)
Sense and Sensitivity: The Roles of Organisation and Stakeholders in Managing Corporate Social ResponsibilityWiley-Blackwell: Business Ethics: A European Review
J. Lozano, Laura Albareda, Tamyko Ysa, H. Roscher, M. Marcuccio (2008)
Governments and Corporate Social Responsibility
M. Prieto-Carrón, Peter Lund-Thomsen, A. Chan, A. Muro, C. Bhushan (2006)
Critical perspectives on CSR and development: what we know, what we don`t know, and what we need to knowInternational Affairs, 82
M. Jacobs (1997)
Sustainability and markets: On the neoclassical model of environmental economicsNew Political Economy, 2
T. Donaldson (1982)
What is business in America?Journal of Business Ethics, 1
I. Iamandi (2007)
Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Responsiveness in a Global Business Environment. A Comparative Theoretical ApproachThe Romanian Economic Journal, 10
B. Turner, R. Kasperson, P. Matson, J. McCarthy, R. Corell, L. Christensen, Noelle Eckley, J. Kasperson, Amy Luers, M. Martello, C. Polsky, Alex Pulsipher, A. Schiller (2003)
A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability scienceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100
J. Clarke (2011)
What is a systematic review?Evidence Based Nursing, 14
K. Wiersum (1995)
200 years of sustainability in forestry: Lessons from historyEnvironmental Management, 19
M. Jacobs (1995)
Sustainable Development, Capital Substitution and Economic Humility: A Response to BeckermanEnvironmental Values, 4
Abagail McWilliams, D. Siegel, P. Wright (2006)
Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic ImplicationsWiley-Blackwell: Journal of Management Studies
R. Norgaard (1994)
Development betrayed: the end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future.
Christopher Marquis, M. Glynn, G. Davis (2007)
Community Isomorphism and Corporate Social ActionIO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets
A. Carroll, K. Shabana (2010)
The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and PracticeCGN: Corporate Social Responsibility/Corporate Citizenship (Topic)
D. Wood, Ray Jones (1995)
STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCEInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3
B. Littig, E. Griessler (2005)
Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theoryInternational Journal of Sustainable Development, 8
C. Prahalad, G. Hamel (2007)
Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm?Southern Medical Journal, 15
E. Garriga, D. Melé (2004)
Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the TerritoryJournal of Business Ethics, 53
H. Bossel (2000)
Policy assessment and simulation of actor orientation for sustainable developmentEcological Economics, 35
Susan Opp, Kyle Saunders (2013)
Pillar TalkUrban Affairs Review, 49
R. Gallimore, Claude Goldenberg, T. Weisner (1993)
The social construction and subjective reality of activity settings: Implications for community psychologyAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 21
M. Clarkson (1995)
A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 20
D. Owen (2008)
Chronicles of wasted time?: A personal reflection on the current state of, and future prospects for, social and environmental accounting researchAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21
Paul Godfrey, N. Hatch (2006)
Researching Corporate Social Responsibility: An Agenda for the 21st CenturyJournal of Business Ethics, 70
A. Carroll (1979)
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 4
Jennifer Brinkerhoff (2002)
Assessing and improving partnership relationships and outcomes: a proposed frameworkEvaluation and Program Planning, 25
T. Gladwin, J. Kennelly, T. Krause (1995)
Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and ResearchAcademy of Management Review, 20
T. Donaldson, L. Preston (1995)
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 20
R. Prescott-Allen (2001)
The Wellbeing of Nations: A Country-by-Country Index of Quality of Life and the Environment
F. Reinhardt (1998)
Environmental Product Differentiation: Implications for Corporate StrategyCalifornia Management Review, 40
D. Wood (1991)
Corporate Social Performance RevisitedAcademy of Management Review, 16
C. Valor (2005)
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability
Abbass Alkhafaji (1989)
A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Governance: Managing in a Dynamic Environment
Cynthia Williams, Ruth Aguilera (2008)
Corporate Social Responsibility in a Comparative Perspective
M. Longo, M. Mura, A. Bonoli (2005)
Corporate social responsibility and corporate performance: the case of Italian SMEsCorporate Governance, 5
K. Goodpaster (1991)
Business Ethics and Stakeholder AnalysisBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 1
A. Marcus, Marc Anderson (2006)
A General Dynamic Capability: Does it Propagate Business and Social Competencies in the Retail Food Industry?*Journal of Management Studies, 43
Jean‐Pascal Gond, A. Crane (2010)
Corporate Social Performance Disoriented: Saving the Lost Paradigm?Business & Society, 49
R. Johnson, A. Onwuegbuzie (2004)
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has ComeEducational Researcher, 33
J. Hosseini, Steven Brenner (1992)
The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: A Methodology to Generate Value Matrix WeightsBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 2
J. Farley (2014)
Steady state economics
Emira Bečić, Em. Mulej, Jadranka Švarc (2012)
Measuring Social Progress by Sustainable Development Indicators: Cases of Croatia and SloveniaProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 37
Ruth Aguilera, D. Rupp, Cynthia Williams, Jyoti Ganapathi (2004)
Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: a Multi-Level Theory of Social Change in OrganizationsCorporate Law: Law & Finance
A. Mayer (2008)
Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems.Environment international, 34 2
L. Preston, H. Sapienza (1990)
Stakeholder management and corporate performanceJournal of Behavioral Economics, 19
J. Meadowcroft (2002)
Planning for sustainable development: what can be learned from the critics?
Jean‐Pascal Gond, N. Kang, J. Moon (2011)
The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibilityEconomy and Society, 40
Marcel Marrewijk, Marco Werre (2003)
Multiple Levels of Corporate SustainabilityJournal of Business Ethics, 44
J. Mihelcic, J. Crittenden, M. Small, D. Shonnard, D. Hokanson, Qiong Zhang, Hui Chen, S. Sorby, V. James, J. Sutherland, J. Schnoor (2003)
Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline.Environmental science & technology, 37 23
C. Adams, Ambika Zutshi (2004)
Corporate Social Responsibility: Why Business Should Act Responsibly and Be AccountableAustralian Accounting Review, 14
M. Porter, M. Kramer (2006)
Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility.Harvard business review, 84 12
F. Bakker, P. Groenewegen, F. Hond (2005)
A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social PerformanceBusiness & Society, 44
Paula Rayman (2001)
Beyond the Bottom Line
Dirk Matten, A. Crane, W. Chapple (2003)
Behind the Mask: Revealing the True Face of Corporate CitizenshipJournal of Business Ethics, 45
S. Cooper, D. Owen (2007)
Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability:the missing linkAccounting Organizations and Society, 32
P. Dutta, Saul Lach, A. Rustichini (1993)
Better Late than Early: Vertical Differentiation in the Adoption of a New TechnologyMicroeconomics: Production
Christopher Marquis, M. Lounsbury (2006)
Vive La Resistance: Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U.S. Community BankingMonetary Economics eJournal
Steven Brenner, Philip Cochran (1991)
The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm
Shawn Berman, A. Wicks, S. Kotha, T. Jones (1999)
Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 42
P. Ekins (1992)
A New World Order : Grassroots Movements for Global Change
T. Donaldson, Thomas Dunfee (1994)
Toward A Unified Conception Of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts TheoryAcademy of Management Review, 19
François Lépineux (2003)
Dans quelle mesure une entreprise peut-elle être responsable à l'égard de la cohésion sociale?
M. López, A. García, L. Rodríguez (2007)
Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability IndexJournal of Business Ethics, 75
M. Branco, L. Rodrigues (2006)
Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based PerspectivesJournal of Business Ethics, 69
P. Bansal, Kendall Roth (2000)
Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological ResponsivenessAcademy of Management Journal, 43
P. Newell (2005)
Citizenship, accountability and community: the limits of the CSR agendaInternational Affairs, 81
C. Hill, T. Jones (1992)
Stakeholder‐Agency TheoryJournal of Management Studies, 29
M. Scott, H. Rothman (1992)
Companies With a Conscience: Intimate Portraits of Twelve Firms That Make a Difference
Purpose – Beginning with a multitude of differing definitions and theories of CSR and sustainability, an analysis of the effects and impacts of the social domain to remain an untapped resource to strengthen and merge the practice of sustainable development. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Utilizing a systematic review of literature between 1977 and 2013 about CSR and sustainability definitions and theories to reveal knowledge fragmentation in the use of the social domain and its implications within sustainable development. Findings – Identifies the gaps of the social domain in sustainable development and raises awareness to advance sustainable development beyond current sustainable development strategies, initiatives and practices. The pertinent publications from the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the systematic literature review were analyzed to determine how the social domain is used and interpreted in CSR and sustainability. Based upon the findings, four themes represent the social domain as socio-economics, stakeholders, societal well-being and social sustainability with suggestions for further research. Research limitations/implications – The systematic literature review searched one academic search engine and focussed on journals and books written in English. Originality/value – The contribution of the paper highlights, first, how an underdeveloped social domain can contribute toward multiple meanings of sustainable development and the social domain’s untapped capacity to develop a clearer standard definition of sustainable development and second, the potential to advance competitive advantage for corporations and governments.
World Journal of Science Technology and Sustainable Development – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 13, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.