Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

UNION DECERTIFICATION RESEARCH REVIEW AND THEORETICAL INTEGRATION

UNION DECERTIFICATION RESEARCH REVIEW AND THEORETICAL INTEGRATION We present a comprehensive literature review and critique of union decertification research, and develop a theoretical framework that should prove useful for future research. The framework incorporates three theoretical viewpoints from several research traditions the expected utility, socialpolitical, and workplace voice perspectives. We provide suggestions for how each viewpoint can be modeled in future research. Additionally, although some previous decertification research was theoretically rich, the empirical findings across prior studies were ambiguous and inconsistent. We analyze the reasons for the ambiguous and inconsistent prior findings, and note how future research can avoid or minimize the empirical problems of the past. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Conflict Management Emerald Publishing

UNION DECERTIFICATION RESEARCH REVIEW AND THEORETICAL INTEGRATION

Download PDF
32 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/union-decertification-research-review-and-theoretical-integration-vYsabRW01e

References (43)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1044-4068
DOI
10.1108/eb022800
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

We present a comprehensive literature review and critique of union decertification research, and develop a theoretical framework that should prove useful for future research. The framework incorporates three theoretical viewpoints from several research traditions the expected utility, socialpolitical, and workplace voice perspectives. We provide suggestions for how each viewpoint can be modeled in future research. Additionally, although some previous decertification research was theoretically rich, the empirical findings across prior studies were ambiguous and inconsistent. We analyze the reasons for the ambiguous and inconsistent prior findings, and note how future research can avoid or minimize the empirical problems of the past.

Journal

International Journal of Conflict Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Apr 1, 1997

There are no references for this article.