Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Understanding, attitude and environment The essentials for developing creativity in STEM researchers

Understanding, attitude and environment The essentials for developing creativity in STEM researchers Purpose – This paper is written to add to current knowledge of the views of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) discipline early career researchers (ECRs) about creativity. It aims to explore their understandings of and attitudes towards creativity, as well as their perceptions of which environmental factors facilitate creative research. By discussing the findings in the context of earlier work, the paper seeks to challenge developers to re‐examine current practice in developing creativity by suggesting a broader and deeper approach than is currently often taken. Design/methodology/approach – The paper reports on a qualitative study which collected data from semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with STEM researchers. A thematic analysis was performed on the data. Findings – This research demonstrates that young researchers have a complex range of perceptions of creativity, and that negative attitudes towards it are common in the STEM environment. Three key environmental facilitators of creativity were also uncovered which are: a positive research environment; sufficient constructive communication; and time and space to be creative. It is argued that more emphasis should be placed upon optimising the environment for creative work to occur. Originality/value – Whereas most previous work has focussed on experienced scientists, this paper outlines the complex and important issue of creativity in the context of STEM ECRs. It offers those who wish to support such researchers an accessible summary and recommendations of how to improve practice in the development of creativity. In particular, the paper argues that placing a greater emphasis upon optimising the environment will enhance the impact of creativity development efforts. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal for Researcher Development Emerald Publishing

Understanding, attitude and environment The essentials for developing creativity in STEM researchers

Download PDF
20 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/understanding-attitude-and-environment-the-essentials-for-developing-0Ynu6n9Af6
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
2048-8696
DOI
10.1108/IJRD-09-2012-0028
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper is written to add to current knowledge of the views of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) discipline early career researchers (ECRs) about creativity. It aims to explore their understandings of and attitudes towards creativity, as well as their perceptions of which environmental factors facilitate creative research. By discussing the findings in the context of earlier work, the paper seeks to challenge developers to re‐examine current practice in developing creativity by suggesting a broader and deeper approach than is currently often taken. Design/methodology/approach – The paper reports on a qualitative study which collected data from semi‐structured in‐depth interviews with STEM researchers. A thematic analysis was performed on the data. Findings – This research demonstrates that young researchers have a complex range of perceptions of creativity, and that negative attitudes towards it are common in the STEM environment. Three key environmental facilitators of creativity were also uncovered which are: a positive research environment; sufficient constructive communication; and time and space to be creative. It is argued that more emphasis should be placed upon optimising the environment for creative work to occur. Originality/value – Whereas most previous work has focussed on experienced scientists, this paper outlines the complex and important issue of creativity in the context of STEM ECRs. It offers those who wish to support such researchers an accessible summary and recommendations of how to improve practice in the development of creativity. In particular, the paper argues that placing a greater emphasis upon optimising the environment will enhance the impact of creativity development efforts.

Journal

International Journal for Researcher Development – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 17, 2013

Keywords: Creativity; Early career researchers; Skills development

References

  • Promoting creativity and innovation in biotechnology
    Adams, D.; Beniston, L.; Childs, P.
  • A skills perception inventory for evaluating postgraduate transferable skills development
    Alpay, E.; Walsh, E.
  • The Social Psychology of Creativity
    Amabile, T.M.
  • The atmosphere of pure work: creativity in research and development
    Amabile, T.M.
  • Creativity in Context
    Amabile, T.
  • Cultivating creative endeavour in doctoral research
    Bargar, R.; Duncan, J.
  • Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice
    Barker, C.
  • Conceptualising research performance
    Bazeley, P.
  • Philosophy of Social Science: The Philosophical Foundations of Social Thought
    Benton, T.; Craib, I.
  • How to Interview
    Bingham, W.; Moore, B.
  • Creativity and performativity: counterpoints in British and Australian education
    Burnard, P.; White, J.
  • Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention
    Csíkszentmihályi, M.
  • Six Thinking Hats
    de Bono, E.
  • Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science
    DeHaan, R.L.
  • Doctoring uncertainty: mastering craft knowledge
    Delamont, S.; Atkinson, P.
  • Scientists go to war with their funding council
    Fazackerley, A.
  • The influence of personality on artistic scientific creativity
    Feist, G.
  • Cambridge leader: going for growth will harm long‐term contributions
    Gibney, E.
  • Something new in the garden: assessing creativity in academic domains
    Grigorenko, E.L.; Jarvin, L.; Tan, M.; Sternberg, R.J.
  • Anti‐creativity, ambiguity and the imposition of order
    Harding, J.; Hale, L.
  • Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research
    Heinze, T.; Shapira, P.; Rogers, J.D.; Senker, J.M.
  • Creative Knowledge Environments: The Influences on Creativity in Research
    Hemlin, S.; Martin‐Allwood, C.; Martin, B.R.
  • Strategically important subjects
    Higher Education Funding Council for England
  • Blueprint for Technology
    HM Government
  • Human Beings
    Hudson, L.
  • Rally round the ring fence – the budget battle is not over
    Jump, P.
  • The Critique of Pure Reason
    Kant, I.
  • The Conduct of Inquiry
    Kaplan, A.
  • The Act of Creation
    Koestler, A.
  • Theories of creativity
    Kozbelt, A.; Beghetto, R.A.; Runco, M.A.
  • The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
    Kuhn, T.
  • Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
    Latour, B.; Woolgar, S.
  • Rank injustice
    Lawrence, P.A.
  • Doctoral degrees beyond 2010: Training talented researchers for society
    League of European Research Universities
  • A guide to increased creativity in research – inspiration or perspiration?
    Loehle, C.
  • Being a good course‐taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research
    Lovitts, B.E.
  • Personality and the realization of creative potential
    MacKinnon, D.W.
  • Leader: short‐term outlook, no blue skies
    Mroz, A.
  • Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research
    Mumford, M.D.
  • Enhancing creativity
    Nickerson, R.S.
  • How to be Better at Creativity
    Petty, G.
  • Code of practice for the assurance of academic quality and standards in higher education
    Quality Assurance Agency