Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Uncontested: electoral competition in American school board elections

Uncontested: electoral competition in American school board elections The purpose of this research was to determine the extent to which American school board members faced electoral competition, as well as the factors influencing the likelihood of competition.Design/methodology/approachThe authors utilized original national survey data of American school board members linked with school district demographic data obtained from the National Center for Education Statistics. Several hypotheses were tested using three state-level fixed-effects logistic regression models predicting electoral competition.FindingsThe authors found that 39.6% of American school board members reported not having an opponent in their most recent election. School board members serving larger urban school districts with higher percentages of special needs students and racial minorities were more likely to have faced electoral competition.Originality/valueThe authors highlighted potential flaws in the traditional model of local democratic governance and helped expand understanding of the dissatisfaction theory of American democracy and continuous participation theory. The authors concluded with several suggestions on how the results can be used to inform future local governance reforms that increase electoral competition and/or create more effective governance models. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Educational Administration Emerald Publishing

Uncontested: electoral competition in American school board elections

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/uncontested-electoral-competition-in-american-school-board-elections-DJbufspnZn
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0957-8234
DOI
10.1108/jea-02-2019-0020
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine the extent to which American school board members faced electoral competition, as well as the factors influencing the likelihood of competition.Design/methodology/approachThe authors utilized original national survey data of American school board members linked with school district demographic data obtained from the National Center for Education Statistics. Several hypotheses were tested using three state-level fixed-effects logistic regression models predicting electoral competition.FindingsThe authors found that 39.6% of American school board members reported not having an opponent in their most recent election. School board members serving larger urban school districts with higher percentages of special needs students and racial minorities were more likely to have faced electoral competition.Originality/valueThe authors highlighted potential flaws in the traditional model of local democratic governance and helped expand understanding of the dissatisfaction theory of American democracy and continuous participation theory. The authors concluded with several suggestions on how the results can be used to inform future local governance reforms that increase electoral competition and/or create more effective governance models.

Journal

Journal of Educational Administration – Emerald Publishing

Published: May 1, 2020

Keywords: School boards; School board elections; Democratic governance

References

  • Does school board turnover matter? Revisiting critical variables in the dissatisfaction theory of American democracy
    Alsbury, T.L.
  • School board member and superintendent turnover and the influence on student achievement: an application of the dissatisfaction theory
    Alsbury, T.L.
  • The transformation of urban political leadership in Western Europe
    Borraz, O.; John, P.
  • Gender differences in the decision to run for school board
    Deckman, M.
  • Democracy, legitimacy and local government electoral reform
    Evans, M.
  • Elections, voting, and democracy in local school district governance
    Feuerstein, A.
  • Do school board governance best practices improve district performance? Testing the key work of school boards in Wisconsin
    Ford, M.R.; Ihrke, D.
  • Board conflict and public performance on urban and non-urban boards: evidence from a national sample of school board members
    Ford, M.R.; Ihrke, D.M.
  • More than 12 percentage point spike in contested November school board elections compared to 2016
    Gillip, M.
  • Is discord detrimental? Using institutional variation to identify the impact of public governing board conflict on outcomes
    Grissom, J.A.
  • Determinants of policy conflict in Michigan municipalities
    Heidbreder, B.; Grasse, N.; Ihrke, D.; Cherry, B.D.
  • Public support grows for higher teacher pay and expanded school choice: results from the 2019 education next poll
    Henderson, M.B.; Houston, D.; Peterson, P.E.; West, M.R.
  • Conflict on city councils in Wisconsin
    Ihrke, D.M.; Niederjohn, S.
  • School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement
    Lafortune, J.; Rothstein, J.; Schanzenbach, D.W.
  • Black representation and educational policy: are they related?
    Meier, K.J.; England, R.E.
  • Cooperation and conflict in multiracial school districts
    Meier, K.J.; Stewart, J.
  • First, kill all the school boards
    Miller, M.
  • ‘Outsiders with deep pockets’: the nationalization of local school board elections
    Reckhow, S.; Henig, J.; Jacobsen, R.; Litt, J.A.
  • School districts matter: local educational authorities and state instructional policy
    Spillane, J.
  • The disproportionate erosion of local control: urban school boards, high-stakes accountability, and democracy
    Trujillo, T.M.
  • Toward an understanding of public school politics
    Eliot, T.
  • Possibilities, problems, and progress: early lessons from the charter movement
    Nathan, J.
  • Does school district takeover work? Assessing the effectiveness of city and state takeover as a school reform strategy
    Wong, K.K.; Shen, F.X.