Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Uncertainty avoidance: public sector clients and procurement selection

Uncertainty avoidance: public sector clients and procurement selection Purpose – Choosing the appropriate procurement system for construction projects is a complex and challenging task for clients particularly when professional advice has not been sought. To assist with the decision‐making process, a range of procurement selection tools and techniques have been developed by both academic and industry bodies. Public sector clients in Western Australia (WA) remain uncertain about the pairing of procurement method to bespoke construction project and how this decision will ultimately impact upon project success. This paper seeks to examine “how and why” a public sector agency selected particular procurement methods. Design/methodology/approach – An analysis of two focus group workshops (with 18 senior project and policy managers involved with procurement selection) is reported upon. Findings – The traditional lump sum (TLS) method is still the preferred procurement path even though alternative forms such as design and construct, public‐private‐partnerships could optimize the project outcome. Paradoxically, workshop participants agreed that alternative procurement forms should be considered, but an embedded culture of uncertainty avoidance invariably meant that TLS methods were selected. Senior managers felt that only a limited number of contractors have the resources and experience to deliver projects using the non‐traditional methods considered. Practical implications – The research identifies a need to develop a framework that public sector clients can use to select an appropriate procurement method. Learning from previous experiences with regard to procurement selection will further provide public sector clients with knowledge about how to best deliver their projects. Originality/value – The paper adds insight as to how public sector agencies select particular procurement methods. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Public Sector Management Emerald Publishing

Uncertainty avoidance: public sector clients and procurement selection

Download PDF
24 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/uncertainty-avoidance-public-sector-clients-and-procurement-selection-wUz5x8oe13
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0951-3558
DOI
10.1108/09513550810904550
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Choosing the appropriate procurement system for construction projects is a complex and challenging task for clients particularly when professional advice has not been sought. To assist with the decision‐making process, a range of procurement selection tools and techniques have been developed by both academic and industry bodies. Public sector clients in Western Australia (WA) remain uncertain about the pairing of procurement method to bespoke construction project and how this decision will ultimately impact upon project success. This paper seeks to examine “how and why” a public sector agency selected particular procurement methods. Design/methodology/approach – An analysis of two focus group workshops (with 18 senior project and policy managers involved with procurement selection) is reported upon. Findings – The traditional lump sum (TLS) method is still the preferred procurement path even though alternative forms such as design and construct, public‐private‐partnerships could optimize the project outcome. Paradoxically, workshop participants agreed that alternative procurement forms should be considered, but an embedded culture of uncertainty avoidance invariably meant that TLS methods were selected. Senior managers felt that only a limited number of contractors have the resources and experience to deliver projects using the non‐traditional methods considered. Practical implications – The research identifies a need to develop a framework that public sector clients can use to select an appropriate procurement method. Learning from previous experiences with regard to procurement selection will further provide public sector clients with knowledge about how to best deliver their projects. Originality/value – The paper adds insight as to how public sector agencies select particular procurement methods.

Journal

International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Oct 3, 2008

Keywords: Procurement; Public sector organizations; Decision making; Australia

References

  • Project procurement system selection model
    Alhazmi, T.; McCaffer, R.
  • Construction procurement selection strategy using analytical hierarchy process
    Al‐Tabtabi, H.M.
  • Procurement system evaluation for the construction industry
    Ambrose, M.; Tucker, S.N.
  • Procurement and Project Delivery in the Building and Construction Industries
    APP
  • Procurement systems for building
    Bennett, J.; Grice, A.
  • Application of Expert Systems to Quantity Surveying
    Brandon, P.S.; Basden, A.; Hamilton, I.W.; Stockley, J.E.
  • Towards an expert system on project procurement
    Chan, A.P.C.
  • Transaction – Cost‐based Procurement Route Selection Technique: A Conceptual Framework
    Chang, C.Y.; Ive, G.
  • An analytical hierarchy process based procurement selection method
    Cheung, S.O.; Lam, T.I.; Leung, M.Y.; Wan, Y.W.
  • Project Delivery and Contract Strategy
    CII
  • Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches
    Creswell, J.W.
  • Building Procurement Systems
    Franks, J.
  • Choosing appropriate construction contracting method
    Gordon, C.M.
  • Using a weighted score model as an aid to selecting procurement methods for small building works
    Griffith, A.; Headley, J.D.
  • Charting the Corporate Mind: From Dilemma to Strategy
    Hampden‐Turner, C.
  • Case Study of the Action Peninsula Development. Department of Industry, Science and Resources
    Hampson, K.D.; Peters, R.J.; Walker, D.H.T.; Tucker, S.N.; Ambrose, M.; Mohamed, S.
  • Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind
    Hofstede, G.
  • Beyond partnering: toward a new approach to project management
    Howell, G.; Miles, R.; Fehling, C.; Ballard, G.
  • Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology
    Krippendorf, K.
  • Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
    Krueger, R.; Casey, M.
  • Linking procurement systems to project priorities
    Kumaraswamy, M.M.; Dissanayaka, S.M.
  • Developing a decision support system for building project procurement
    Kumaraswamy, M.M.; Dissanayaka, S.M.
  • Partnering research in construction
    Li, H.; Cheng, E.W.L.; Love, P.E.D.
  • From act to outcome – a cognitive model of construction procurement
    Liu, A.M.M.
  • Fast building: an Australian perspective
    Love, P.E.D.
  • A rework reduction model for construction projects
    Love, P.E.D.; Irani, Z.; Edwards, D.J.
  • Selecting an appropriate procurement method for a building project
    Love, P.E.D.; Skitmore, R.M.; Earl, G.
  • Parameters governing the selection of procurement system – an empirical survey
    Luu, D.T.; Ng, S.T.; Chen, S.E.
  • A case‐based procurement advisory system for construction
    Luu, D.T.; Ng, S.T.; Chen, S.E.
  • Formulating procurement selection criteria through case‐based reasoning approach
    Luu, D.T.; Ng, S.T.; Chen, S.E.
  • An Introduction to Building Procurement Systems
    Masterman, J.
  • Building Procurement
    Mortledge, R.; Smith, A.; Kashiwagi, D.T.
  • PASCON an expert system to evaluate alternative project procurement processes
    Moshini, R.A.; Botros, A.F.
  • Think About Building: A Successful Business Customer's Guide to Using the Construction Industry
    NEDO
  • Critical analysis of time and cost of management and traditional contracts
    Noaum, S.G.
  • Procurement Method Selection Guidelines
    NSW Department of Commerce
  • Questionnaire Design, Interviewing, and Attitude Measurement
    Oppenheim, A.N.
  • Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods
    Patton, M.Q.
  • Surveyors' Construction Handbook
    RCIS
  • The influence of tape recording on counselling
    Roberts, R.R.; Renzaglia, G.A.
  • Selection criteria
    Rowlinson, S.
  • African intelligentsia – why have we embraced ‘Hyper Barefoot Empiricism’ in procurement practices?
    Rwelamila, P.; Talukhaba, A.; Kivaa, T.
  • Report on the development and validation of the best practice decision matrix
    Sidwell, A.C.; Kennedy, R.; Budiawan, D.
  • Literature review value alignment process for project delivery
    Sidwell, A.C.; Kennedy, R.; Budiawan, D.
  • Which procurement system? Towards a universal procurement selection technique
    Skitmore, R.M.; Marsden, D.E.
  • Barriers to the development of SMEs in the Australian construction industry
    Smith, J.; Mills, A.; Love, P.E.D.
  • Achieving outstanding performance
    SRD Consulting
  • Focus groups: Theory and practice
    Stewart, D.W.; Shamdasani, P.N.