Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Lingard (2013)
The impact of research on education policy in an era of evidence-based policyCritical Studies in Education, 54
B. Lingard (2011)
Policy as numbers: ac/counting for educational researchThe Australian Educational Researcher, 38
Meredith Honig, N. Venkateswaran, P. Mcneil, Jenee Twitchell (2014)
Leaders’ Use of Research for Fundamental Change in School District Central Offices: Processes and Challenges
W. Grubb, R. Allen (2011)
Rethinking school funding, resources, incentives, and outcomesJournal of Educational Change, 12
(2018)
Enabling educator professional development through resourcing: a pan-Canadian perspective
L. White, S. Prentice (2016)
Early childhood education and care reform in Canadian provinces: Understanding the role of experts and evidence in policy changeCanadian Public Administration-administration Publique Du Canada, 59
S. Frank, Joseph Trawick-Smith (2014)
Spinning Straw into Gold: How State Education Agencies Can Transform Their Data to Improve Critical School Resource Decisions.
B. Malen, Justin Dayhoff, Laura Egan, Robert Croninger (2017)
The Challenges of Advancing Fiscal Equity in a Resource-Strained ContextEducational Policy, 31
B. Levin (2008)
Fix the Flawed Funding Formula!Phi Delta Kappan Magazine, 89
(2017)
Ontario’s suspension and expulsion program evaluation: final report
R. Asen, Deb Gurke (2014)
The Research on Education, Deliberation, and Decision-Making (REDD) Project
B. Levin, Nancy Naylor (2007)
Using Resources Effectively in Education
Miriam Green (2016)
Neoliberalism and Management Scholarship: Educational ImplicationsPhilosophy of Management, 15
(2016)
The cost of secondary course failure: the case of Ontario
D. Allison (1989)
Toward the Fifth Age: The Continuing Evolution of Academic Educational Administration.
C. Weiss (1979)
The many meanings of research utilization.Public Administration Review, 39
PurposePublic education is an important institution in any democracy, and the significant resources invested form a critical pillar in its provision. The evidence used to manage said resources is, therefore, an important issue for education leaders and a matter public interest. The purpose of this paper is to consider the role education finance leaders in Ontario, Canada, and what types of evidence they are using, how they are being employed and how much priority is given to each.Design/methodology/approachThe paper employs a review of Ontario’s K-12 education funding policies/reports, and interviews with five K-12 funding model experts/leaders – four business superintendents from school boards of varying sizes (based on enrollment) and one system leader (to introduce perspective from the two levels of governance in resource management) to understand how these experts use evidence to inform resource decision making. This sampling strategy was also grounded in a key assumption: School boards with larger enrollment – and consequently larger budgets – will have greater capacity to use all forms of evidence when managing resources, as the majority of board revenue comes from grants that are mostly based on enrollment.FindingsThe findings bring important definition and prioritization of evidence that inform leaders’ resource decision making in education. The results point to two tacit, normative, unacknowledged and, yet, competing evidence frameworks driving resource management. The government is the most influential, prioritizing strategic policy, performance data, fiscal context and professional judgment; values embedded in policy and research were mentioned only in passing, while local anecdotal types of evidence were given less priority. Compounding this challenge is that all sides in debates on school resource needs face issues of access to, transparency in the use of and the prioritization given to various evidence types.Research limitations/implicationsGovernments, with the assistance of academics, should formally articulate and make public the evidence framework they use to drive resource decision making. All sides of the resource management debate need to value a wider range of evidence, notably evidence that speak to local concerns, to reduce information gaps and, potentially, improve on the effective delivery of local educational programming. Education finance researchers could help to address access gaps by distilling research on the effective use of resources in a manner that is timely, tailored to the fiscal climate and to system- or district-level readiness for the implementation of a particular initiative.Practical implicationsResource management driven solely by “facts” can support student achievement outcomes and effective system operation, but alone will not satisfy local-level aspirations for education or inspire public confidence; a key ingredient for the sustainability of this public institution. The results could be used to improve the balance of “decent information” used to inform resource deliberations and establish a shared understanding across stakeholder groups to facilitate compromise. The current state of affairs has all sides in advancing claims for resource needs based on what they understand to be evidence all while portraying competing claims as uninformed, undermining public confidence in education.Originality/valueThe paper draws from interviews with business superintendents and a system-level funding model expert, both lesser studied leaders on this topic in the Canadian context; offers a clear articulation of the evidence frameworks at play and the priority given to each type and how they are being used; presents definition and prioritization of evidence from the perspective of leaders in the Canadian context (most of literature is from the USA) – experts acknowledge that resource knowledge is contextually contingent and insight generated from other contexts will help to advance the field.
International Journal of Educational Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 8, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.