Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Transforming students’ behaviour preferences: achievable changes by a sustainability course

Transforming students’ behaviour preferences: achievable changes by a sustainability course The purpose of this paper is to examine the impacts of a sustainability course that was designed to evoke measurable transformational changes in students’ preferences and in their roles as consumers, employees and citizens, via consciously addressing sustainability issues and involving a community partner.Design/methodology/approachThe research was undertaken using mixed methods. Q-methodology helped create student groups with similar preferences for sustainable attitudes and behaviours before and after the course; the most important features of attitude changes and identify the phases of transformation were explored. In-depth interviews with each participant contributed to understanding and explaining the motivation for changing preferences and generated individual-level reflections about the perceived process of transformation.FindingsQ-method highlighted how stakeholder roles were transformed from the three pre-factors to the three post-factors and for the whole group. Seven phases of transformational change are identified based on the reflective in-depth interviews from “no transformation” to “change agent behavior”.Practical implicationsFindings provide new perspectives for evaluating and embracing the transformational potential of sustainability courses.Originality/valueAssessing the impacts of sustainability courses on students’ transformation via measuring their mindsets and behaviour preferences prior to and after a course is still an under-researched area, especially in relation to the Q-method. A further unique feature is how the influence of engaged community partner on students’ preferences is captured. The explored scope of individual responsibility goes beyond environmental awareness and addresses participants in various stakeholder roles simultaneously, by examining their priorities as consumers, employees and citizens. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education Emerald Publishing

Transforming students’ behaviour preferences: achievable changes by a sustainability course

Download PDF
19 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/transforming-students-behaviour-preferences-achievable-changes-by-a-GmV6g0xVqu
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1467-6370
eISSN
1467-6370
DOI
10.1108/ijshe-01-2022-0018
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the impacts of a sustainability course that was designed to evoke measurable transformational changes in students’ preferences and in their roles as consumers, employees and citizens, via consciously addressing sustainability issues and involving a community partner.Design/methodology/approachThe research was undertaken using mixed methods. Q-methodology helped create student groups with similar preferences for sustainable attitudes and behaviours before and after the course; the most important features of attitude changes and identify the phases of transformation were explored. In-depth interviews with each participant contributed to understanding and explaining the motivation for changing preferences and generated individual-level reflections about the perceived process of transformation.FindingsQ-method highlighted how stakeholder roles were transformed from the three pre-factors to the three post-factors and for the whole group. Seven phases of transformational change are identified based on the reflective in-depth interviews from “no transformation” to “change agent behavior”.Practical implicationsFindings provide new perspectives for evaluating and embracing the transformational potential of sustainability courses.Originality/valueAssessing the impacts of sustainability courses on students’ transformation via measuring their mindsets and behaviour preferences prior to and after a course is still an under-researched area, especially in relation to the Q-method. A further unique feature is how the influence of engaged community partner on students’ preferences is captured. The explored scope of individual responsibility goes beyond environmental awareness and addresses participants in various stakeholder roles simultaneously, by examining their priorities as consumers, employees and citizens.

Journal

International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 5, 2023

Keywords: Education for sustainability; Transformation; Course; Impact; Preferences; Q-methodology

References

  • Prospective teachers’ perceptions about the concept of sustainable development and related issues in Oman
    Ambusaidi, A.; Washahi, M.
  • Learning for the future? Effects of education for sustainable development (ESD) on teacher education students
    Andersson, K.; Jagers, S.C.; Lindskog, A.; Martinsson, J.
  • Development of students' knowledge-behavioural changes in relation to sustainability through a case study
    Aziz, A.A.; Yusof, K.M.; Udin, A.; Yatim, J.M.
  • The impact of education for sustainable development on Romanian economics and business students' behavior
    Badea, L.; Șerban-Oprescu, G.L.; Dedu, S.; Piroșcă, G.I.
  • Harnessing the environmental professional expertise of engineering students-the course: ‘environmental management systems in the industry’
    Ben-Zvi-Assaraf, O.; Ayal, N.
  • Conducting in-depth interviews: a guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input
    Boyce, C.; Neale, P.
  • A primer on Q-methodology
    Brown, S.R.
  • Meaningful sustainability learning: a study of sustainability pedagogy in two university courses
    Burns, H.
  • Teacher’s manual and method for SD integration in curricula
    Ceulemans, K.; De Prins, M.
  • Transforming environmental values for a younger generation in Taiwan: a participatory action approach to curriculum design
    Chen, K.
  • Attitudinal learning in large-enrollment classrooms: a case study
    Cheng, Z.; Watson, S.L.; Watson, W.R.; Janakiraman, S.
  • Promoting green building literacy through online laboratory experiences
    Cole, L.B.; Quinn, J.; Ktruk, A.; Johson, B.
  • What helps TESOL methods students learn: using Q methodology to investigate students’ views of a graduate TESOL methods class
    Collins, L.; Angelova, M.
  • Sustainability knowledge and behaviors of apparel and textile undergraduates
    Connell, K.Y.H.; Kozar, J.M.
  • Sustainability at universities: students’ perceptions from green and non-green universities
    Dagiliūtė, R.; Liobikienė, G.; Minelgaitė, A.
  • Changing behavior and making it stick
    De Young, R.
  • Evaluation of the Q method as a method of public participation in the selection of sustainable development indicators
    Doody, D.G.; Kearney, P.; Barry, J.; Moles, R.; O’Regan, B.
  • A tudatos fogyasztói magatartás dimenziói, vezetéstudomány
    Dudás, K.
  • The sustainability consciousness questionnaire (SCQ): the theoretical development and empirical validation of an evaluation instrument for stakeholders working with sustainable development
    Gericke, N.; Boeve de-Pauw, J.; Berglund, T.; Olsson, D.
  • A typology of transformation: reviewing the transformative learning literature
    Hoggan, C.
  • A new approach to performing course evaluations: using Q methodology to better understand student attitudes
    Jurczyk, J.; Ramlo, S.; Ramlo, S.
  • Inquiry into sustainability issues by preservice teachers: A pedagogy to enhance sustainability consciousness
    Kalsoom, Q.; Khanam, A.
  • Promoting spillover: how past behaviours increase environmental intentions by cueing self-perceptions
    Lauren, N.; Smith, L.D.; Louis, W.R.; an Dean, A.J.
  • Repertoires of teaching and learning: a comparison of university teachers and students using Q methodology
    Lecouteur, A.; Delfabbro, P.
  • Analysing the factors affecting the incorporation of sustainable development into European higher education institutions’ curricula
    Lozano, R.; Barreiro‐Gen, M.
  • Transformative education: across the threshold
    McWhinney, W.; Markos, L.
  • Changes in pre-service teachers’ values, sense of agency, motivation and consumption practices: a case study of an education for sustainability course
    Merritt, E.; Hale, A.; Archambault, L.
  • Perspective transformation
    Mezirow, J.
  • An overview on transformative learning
    Mezirow, J.; Crowther, J.; Sutherland, P.
  • Including aspects of sustainability in the degree in human nutrition and dietetics: an evaluation based on student perceptions
    Navarro, V.; Martínez, O.; Miranda, J.; Rada, D.; Bustamante, M.Á.; Etaio, I.; Lasa, A.; Simón, E.; Churruca, I.
  • A pilot study on education for sustainable development in the Romanian economic higher education
    Novo-Corti, I.; Badea, L.; Tirca, D.M.; Aceleanu, M.I.
  • Using Q methodology to develop more perceptive insights on transport and social inclusion
    Raje, F.
  • Advancing educational pedagogy for sustainability: developing and implementing programs to transform behaviors
    Redman, E.
  • Changes in perceptions of value orientation in university students after a winter expedition: a report on experiential education from the Czech Republic
    Ruzickova, A.; Ivo, J.; Michal, P.
  • Examining the impacts of a graduate course on sustainable development using ecological footprint analysis
    Ryu, H.C.; Brody, S.D.
  • Learning about sustainability-what influences students’ self-perceived sustainability actions after undergraduate education?
    Sammalisto, K.; Sundström, A.; Von Haartman, R.; Holm, T.; Yao, Z.
  • Achieving transformative sustainability learning: engaging heads, hands and heart
    Sipos, Y.; Battisti, B.; Grimm, K.
  • Q-methodology and tourism research
    Stergiou, D.; Airey, D.
  • Contemporary discourses of green political economy: a Q method analysis
    Stevenson, H.
  • Conceptualizing a ‘sustainability business model’
    Stubbs, W.; Cocklin, C.
  • Exploring links between education and sustainable development goals through the lens of UN flagship reports
    Vladimirova, K.; Le Blanc, D.
  • The role and effectiveness of continuing education training courses offered by higher education institutions in furthering the implementation of sustainable development
    Wehrmeyer, W.; Chenoweth, J.
  • The effective use of RRI teaching methods on a CSR course
    Zsóka, Á.; Ásványi, K.
  • Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students
    Zsóka, A.; Szerényi, Z.M.; Széchy, A.; Kocsis, T.
  • Action research and minority problems
    Lewin, K.; Lewin, G.W.