Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Gallopel-Morvan, C. Moodie, D. Hammond, Figen Eker, E. Béguinot, Y. Martinet (2011)
Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packagingTobacco Control, 21
G. Prendergast, L. Pitt (1996)
Packaging, marketing, logistics and the environment: are there trade‐offs?International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 26
Iris Vilnai-Yavetz, Ran Koren (2013)
Cutting through the clutter: purchase intentions as a function of packaging instrumentality, aesthetics, and symbolismThe International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 23
E. Dahan, J. Hauser (2002)
The virtual customerAquacultural Engineering
M. Kim, K. Lopetcharat, M. Drake (2013)
Influence of packaging information on consumer liking of chocolate milk.Journal of dairy science, 96 8
B. Wansink (1995)
Can Package Size Accelerate Usage Volume?Journal of Marketing, 60
G. Ares, R. Deliza (2010)
Studying the influence of package shape and colour on consumer expectations of milk desserts using word association and conjoint analysisFood Quality and Preference, 21
K. Marsh, B. Bugusu (2007)
Food packaging--roles, materials, and environmental issues.Journal of food science, 72 3
G. Koutsimanis, Kristin Getter, B. Behe, J. Harte, E. Almenar (2012)
Influences of packaging attributes on consumer purchase decisions for fresh produceAppetite, 59
Robert Underwood, N. Klein (2002)
Packaging as Brand Communication: Effects of Product Pictures on Consumer Responses to the Package and BrandJournal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10
Bo Rundh (2005)
The multi‐faceted dimension of packaging: Marketing logistic or marketing tool?British Food Journal, 107
C. McDaniel, R. Baker (1977)
Convenience Food Packaging and the Perception of Product QualityJournal of Marketing, 41
J. Spink, J. Singh, Sumeet Singh (2011)
Review of Package Warning Labels and Their Effect on Consumer Behaviour with Insights to Future Anticounterfeit Strategy of Label and Communication SystemsPackaging Technology and Science, 24
T. Bech-Larsen (1996)
Danish consumers' attitudes to the functional and environmental characteristics of food packagingJournal of Consumer Policy, 19
David Eastwood (1998)
Consumer Acceptance of New Convenience FoodsJournal of Food Products Marketing, 5
L. Berg-Weitzel, G. Laar (2001)
Relation between culture and communication in packaging designJournal of Brand Management, 8
Janet Wagner, M. Eckman (1994)
Judging the attractiveness of product design: The effect of visual attributes andAdvances in Consumer Research, 21
M. Ness, H. Gerhardy (1994)
Consumer Preferences for Quality and Freshness Attributes of EggsBritish Food Journal, 96
N. Azad, Mina Mohammadi (2013)
An empirical survey on factors influencing on packaging dairy productsManagement Science Letters, 3
Ortwin Renn (2005)
Risk perception and communication: Lessons for the Food and Food Packaging IndustryFood Additives & Contaminants, 22
P. Silayoi, M. Speece (2007)
The Importance of Packaging Attributes: A Conjoint Analysis ApproachEuropean Journal of Marketing, 41
P. Green, A. Krieger (1991)
Segmenting Markets with Conjoint AnalysisJournal of Marketing, 55
P. Silayoi, M. Speece (2004)
Packaging and purchase decisionsBritish Food Journal, 106
Andrus Kotri (2006)
Analyzing Customer Value Using Conjoint Analysis: The Example of a Packaging CompanyBehavioral & Experimental Economics
G. Robertson (1992)
Food Packaging: Principles and Practice
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to understand consumer perspectives and trade-offs on packaging convenience attributes of various food and drink packages vs increased cost. Design/methodology/approach – The research utilized structured interviews to collect pertinent data. Personal interviews were conducted at major supermarkets within Bangkok and the vicinity. During data collection, 600 interviews were concluded. Target groups were composed of those who are major shoppers of particular food and drink products. In total, three packages for food products and two packages for drink products were selected for the study, including snack pouches, tuna cans, ready-to-eat plastic trays, laminated juice cartons, and plastic bottles for drinking water. Packaging attributes that were taken into consideration were structure, body style, opening mechanism, reseal features, and tamper-evident characteristics. Part worth analysis and importance level of increased price factors compared with packaging attributes were discussed. Conjoint analysis was used for importance score calculation and data analysis. Findings – The most important packaging attributes for all packages were the opening characteristics. Tamper-evident characteristics were also perceived as very important for drinking water bottles. However, for all packages, the importance score level for the price factor accounted for only 10-19 percent. As a result, opening characteristics of the packages seemed to influence consumer purchasing decisions for food and drink products; most consumers were happy to trade-off on a slight increase in price for additional convenience or tamper-evident features of a package. Originality/value – The findings of this study can be used in making strategic packaging decisions to improve customer satisfaction and increase sales.
British Food Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 5, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.