Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Keith Adler (1999)
Degree Upgrades: A New Service, a New Market and a New Strategy for Higher EducationJournal of Marketing for Higher Education, 9
B. Browne, D. Kaldenberg, W. Browne, Daniel Brown (1998)
Student as Customer: Factors Affecting Satisfaction and Assessments of Institutional QualityJournal of Marketing for Higher Education, 8
Colin Jevons (2006)
Universities: a prime example of branding going wrongJournal of Product & Brand Management, 15
Y. Moogan, Steve Baron (2003)
An analysis of student characteristics within the student decision making processJournal of Further and Higher Education, 27
Nancy Grund (1996)
Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate ImageAcademy of Management Perspectives, 10
D. Bay, H. Daniel
The student is not the customer – an alternative approach
G. Clanton, F. Hirsch (1977)
Social Limits to Growth.Contemporary Sociology, 8
Joseph Petrick, J. Quinn (2001)
Integrity capacity as a strategic asset in achieving organizational excellenceMeasuring Business Excellence, 5
Sandra Liu (1998)
Integrating Strategic Marketing on an Institutional LevelJournal of Marketing for Higher Education, 8
Nijolė Bulotaitė (2003)
University heritage—an institutional tool for branding and marketingHigher Education in Europe, 28
Rania Azmi (2006)
Business Ethics as Competitive Advantage for Companies in the Globalization Era
H. Rolfe (2003)
University strategy in an age of uncertainty: the effect of higher education funding on old and new universitiesHigher Education Quarterly, 57
P. Altbach
India: a world‐class country without world‐class higher education
Kevin Keller (1997)
Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity
J. Pulley (2003)
Romancing the Brand.The Chronicle of higher education, 50
J. Licata, James Maxham (1999)
Student Expectations of the University Experience: Levels and Antecedents for Pre-Entry FreshmenJournal of Marketing for Higher Education, 9
R. Zemsky, Susan Shaman, Daniel Shapiro (2001)
Higher education as competitive enterprise : when markets matter
R. Frank
Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behaviour and the Quest for Status
Rubeena Çetin (2004)
Planning and Implementing Institutional Image and Promoting Academic Programs in Higher EducationJournal of Marketing for Higher Education, 13
L. Hancock, J. McCormick
What to crop?
T. Gatfield (1999)
The International Product Life Cycle Theoretical Framework and Its Application to Marketing Higher Education to International Countries: An Australian/Asian PerspectiveJournal of Marketing for Higher Education, 9
Darlene Bay, Harold Daniel (2001)
The Student Is Not the Customer—An Alternative PerspectiveJournal of Marketing for Higher Education, 11
Jerry Nichols, Paul Orehovec, Scott Ingold (1999)
Using Logistic Regression to Identify New “At-Risk” FreshmenJournal of Marketing for Higher Education, 9
M. Cosser
Student Choice Behaviour
S.K. Joy
Cabinet clears Bills to penalize unfair practices at institutions
Douglas Walker, R. Frank, P. Cook (1995)
The Winner-Take-All Society
Robert Sevier (2001)
Brand as RelevanceJournal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10
J. Nunnally
Using SAS for item analysis and test construction
稔 杉田 (2002)
The winner take all, 8
C. Glassick, M. Huber, G. Maeroff, E. Boyer (1997)
Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate
R. Landrum, Rob Turrisi, Clayton Harless (1999)
University Image: The Benefits of Assessment and ModelingJournal of Marketing for Higher Education, 9
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to develop a perspective that ethical practices in higher education institutions can be a powerful tool for branding and attaining competitive advantage. The paper proposes that an ethical institutional brand can be built on the basis of just and fair practices at the institution, and quality admission and assessment processes. Design/methodology/approach – A survey was conducted in seven different higher education institutions in and around Delhi NCR, India. The data were collected from 167 respondents through a self‐constructed questionnaire based on a five‐point Likert‐type scale. The reliability of the data was computed to have a Cronbach's α of 0.83. Findings – The key findings of the research show a relationship between the perception of the respondents towards the quality of admission process and the development of an ethical institutional brand ( r =0.284, p ≤0.01). They also show that with just and fair academic processes, an ethically strong institution can be built ( r =0.411, p ≤0.01) and development of an ethical institutional brand will lead to attaining competitive advantage in the academic world ( r =0.558, p ≤0.01). Also, the perceptions of undergraduate‐ and postgraduate‐level students on the different variables of ethical practices leading to brand building are found to vary. Research limitations/implications – The sample chosen for the study was taken from Delhi, NCR, and hence does not incorporate the perception of students from Tier II and Tier III cities. Apart from this, the social desirability factor of the respondents (as applicable to all survey research) may also be one of the important limitations that may affect the research findings. Practical implications – The study is a step forward in establishing a higher education system where ethically branded institutes will have an edge over others. The research may add key value for educational entrepreneurs who wish to establish an educational institution, helping them to work towards long‐term competitive advantage. This research endeavour is of help to policy makers, management of institutions, faculty, students and for the improvement of society as a whole. It is an attempt to explain the role of ethics in sustaining long‐term competitive excellence rather than a cutting edge for short‐term gains. It is practically of greater use in understanding the education industry scenario in the context of India, which has seen its education sector grow from philanthropy to being a business. Originality/value – This paper identifies the need to rethink on the ethical functioning of institutions in the dramatically changed business environment of higher education in India. It is probably the first attempt to highlight the importance of ethical practices in higher education, and tries to draw a relationship between these practices and building the brand of higher education institutions. In light of the Education Bill passed in India, which gives great emphasis to ethical practices, the study is of pertinence to all who are willing to establish institutions or compete in the sector of education.
On the Horizon – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 16, 2011
Keywords: Higher education; Ethical practices; Brand building; Competitive advantage; India
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.