Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1959)
Das Prinzip Hoffnung, Surhkamp Verlag, Frankfurt
R. Dawes
Rational Choice in a Uncertain World
Edward Smith, E. Shafir, D. Osherson (1993)
Similarity, plausibility, and judgments of probabilityCognition, 49
J. Potter (1996)
Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction
P. Schwartz (1996)
The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World
W. Wagar (1998)
The Foresight Principle: Cultural Recovery in the 21st Century
K. Boulding (1994)
Towards a new economics : critical essays on ecology, distribution, and other themesSouthern Economic Journal, 61
R. Amara (1991)
Views on futures research methodologyFutures, 23
(1988)
Rational Choice in a Uncertain World, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, Fort Worth, TX
Chris Westrup (2013)
Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social ConstructionAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 11
E. Bloch (1954)
Das Prinzip Hoffnung
J. Wilk (1991)
The art of the long view: Planning for the future in an uncertain worldLong Range Planning, 24
(1964)
L’art de la conjecture, Editions du Rocher, Paris
Wayne Hudson (1982)
The Marxist Philosophy of Ernst Bloch
B. De Jouvenel
L'art de la conjecture
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss the clarification of three qualifiers “probable”, “possible” and “plausible”, which are often used interchangeably in foresight and futures studies practice, but which could obtain added value through a careful distinction. In general, it shows the importance of language as the main tool for futures practitioners. Design/methodology/approach – Employs semantic and conceptual research. Findings – Distinction of the three qualifiers has not only semantic importance; it also leads to a better conception of what futures practice could work towards. Practical implications – Futures practitioners should more carefully apply their vocabulary, since it is their main tool. By carefully distinguishing probability, possibility and plausibility, a better focus on the purpose of futures practice becomes attainable. Originality/value – Very little effort is spent on the working of language in futures studies. Besides glossaries, there is very little work done in sharpening this major tool. The semantic confusion that reigns within the foresight/futures studies community is mainly due to a lack of involvement in this clarification process. Applied semantics is often considered as burdensome, whereas it should be at the core of how the future is being conceptualized.
foresight – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 1, 2006
Keywords: Probability theory; Semantics; Language
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.