Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Hajer, H. Wagenaar (2003)
Deliberative policy analysis : understanding governance in the network society
R. Nahuis, Harro Lente (2008)
Where Are the Politics? Perspectives on Democracy and TechnologyScience, Technology, & Human Values, 33
I. Berlin
The pursuit of the ideal
J. Lenoble, M. Maesschalck (2010)
Democracy, Law and Governance
H. Brooks
Technology, evolution, and purpose
J. Donne
XVII: Nunc Lento Sonitu Dicunt
J. Searle (2001)
Rationality in Action
C. Flick, P. Goujon
ETICA D4.1, governance approaches: a critical appraisal of theory and application
M. Black (1964)
The gap between ‘is’ and ‘should’The Philosophical Review, 73
P. Hamlett (2003)
Technology Theory and Deliberative DemocracyScience, Technology, & Human Values, 28
J. Habermas
The uncoupling of system and lifeworld
N. Luhmann (1975)
Systemtheorie, Evolutionstheorie und Kommunikationstheorie, 22
J. Habermas
“The Political”: The Rational Meaning of a Questionable Inheritance from Political Theology
V. Ikonen, M. Kanerva, P. Kouri
ETICA D1.2, Emerging Technologies Report
I. Levi, R. Brandom (1994)
Making It Explicit
C. Misak
Truth, Politics and Morality
( The ) Economist
Horror worlds
Christine Korsgaard, O. O’neill (1996)
The Sources of Normativity: Frontmatter
C. Korsgaard
The Sources of Normativity
I. Kant
Groundwork for a Metaphysic of Morals
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to criticise ad hoc approaches to ethics in research and development in technology as descriptive and non‐ethical, and based upon a narrow conception of rationality. Design/methodology/approach – The approach deploys a theory of normativity that can incorporate values and a broad conception of rationality, in order to account for the relevance of issues for the addressees of normative injunctions. Findings – A normative approach is possible and required in order to implement ethics in research and development in technology. Originality/value – The approach draws together themes from current alternative approaches that each fail to deploy the full resources of the normative approach, and so fail to fully account for ethics. This approach identifies and moves beyond present limited approaches.
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 16, 2011
Keywords: Civil society; Epistemology; Human values; Normative frameworks; Philosophy; Ethics; Research and development
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.