Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

To downsize or not to downsize – what does the empirical evidence suggest?

To downsize or not to downsize – what does the empirical evidence suggest? PurposeThere has been much written about the effects of downsizing on the financial health and the valuation of companies that engage in this practice. But this literature is fragmented, focusing on various aspects of companies, various reasons for downsizing, and various financial and market outcome measures. The purpose of this paper is to try and address some of this fragmentation by comparing those companies that downsized in 2008, whether financially healthy or not, with those companies that did not downsize.Design/methodology/approachThe impact of the downsizing event was assessed by using various financial measures as well as a measure of company valuation over the short term (2009-2011) and long term (2009-2014).FindingsFindings indicate that across all financial measures, except return on equity, downsizing makes no difference to the financial health of a company either in the short term (up to three years after the downsizing) or in the long term (up to six years after the downsizing). And with regards to return on equity, downsizing companies did more poorly immediately after the downsizing in efficiently using their equity.Originality/valueThe hope is that this work will better inform, not only scholars, but also senior leaders faced with a decision to downsize or not to downsize. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Strategy and Management Emerald Publishing

To downsize or not to downsize – what does the empirical evidence suggest?

Journal of Strategy and Management , Volume 9 (4): 25 – Nov 21, 2016

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/to-downsize-or-not-to-downsize-what-does-the-empirical-evidence-3YkiwKIZWg
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1755-425X
DOI
10.1108/JSMA-10-2015-0085
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThere has been much written about the effects of downsizing on the financial health and the valuation of companies that engage in this practice. But this literature is fragmented, focusing on various aspects of companies, various reasons for downsizing, and various financial and market outcome measures. The purpose of this paper is to try and address some of this fragmentation by comparing those companies that downsized in 2008, whether financially healthy or not, with those companies that did not downsize.Design/methodology/approachThe impact of the downsizing event was assessed by using various financial measures as well as a measure of company valuation over the short term (2009-2011) and long term (2009-2014).FindingsFindings indicate that across all financial measures, except return on equity, downsizing makes no difference to the financial health of a company either in the short term (up to three years after the downsizing) or in the long term (up to six years after the downsizing). And with regards to return on equity, downsizing companies did more poorly immediately after the downsizing in efficiently using their equity.Originality/valueThe hope is that this work will better inform, not only scholars, but also senior leaders faced with a decision to downsize or not to downsize.

Journal

Journal of Strategy and ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Nov 21, 2016

References