Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ines Mergel, R. Rethemeyer, Kimberley Isett (2016)
Big Data in Public AffairsPublic Administration Review, 76
S. Dan, C. Pollitt (2015)
NPM Can Work: An optimistic review of the impact of New Public Management reforms in central and eastern EuropePublic Management Review, 17
S. Thiel (2011)
Comparing Agencification in Central Eastern European and Western European Countries: Fundamentally Alike in Unimportant Respects?Transylvanian review of administrative sciences, 7
W. Drechsler (2009)
Towards a Neo-Weberian European Union? Lisbon Agenda and Public Administration, 10
Ulrich Sedelmeier (2012)
Is Europeanisation through Conditionality Sustainable? Lock-in of Institutional Change after EU AccessionWest European Politics, 35
M. Lodge, C. Hood (2012)
Into an Age of Multiple Austerities? Public Management and Public Service Bargains across OECD CountriesGovernance, 25
C. Pollitt, G. Bouckaert (2004)
Public Management Reform: A Comparative AnalysisOUP Catalogue
Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling (2009)
Varieties of legacies: a critical review of legacy explanations of public administration reform in East Central EuropeInternational Review of Administrative Sciences, 75
Tiina Randma-Liiv, W. Kickert (2017)
The Impact of the Fiscal Crisis on Public Administration Reforms: Comparison of 14 European CountriesJournal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19
W. Drechsler (2003)
INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUE PUBLIC POLICY MANAGEMENT AND TRANSPARENCY NETWORK Managing Public Sector Restructuring: Public Sector Downsizing and Redeployment Programs in Central and Eastern Europe
J. Nemec (2010)
New Public Management and its Implementation in CEE: What Do we Know and where Do we Go?, 3
C. Pollitt, S. Dan (2013)
Searching for Impacts in Performance-Oriented Management ReformPublic Performance & Management Review, 37
Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling (2011)
The Durability of EU Civil Service Policy in Central and Eastern Europe after AccessionGovernance, 24
Tarmo Kalvet (2012)
Innovation: a factor explaining e-government success in EstoniaElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 9
Tiina Randma-Liiv, V. Nakrošis, György Hajnal (2011)
Public Sector Organization in Central and Eastern Europe: From Agencification to De-AgencificationTransylvanian review of administrative sciences, 7
Patrick Dunleavy, H. Margetts, Simon Bastow, J. Tinkler (2005)
New public management is dead. Long live digital-era governanceJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16
W. Drechsler, Tiina Randma-Liiv (2016)
In Some Central and Eastern European Countries, Some NPM Tools May Sometimes Work: A reply to Dan and Pollitt’s ‘NPM can work’Public Management Review, 18
L. Lynn (1993)
Innovation and the Public Interest: Insights from the Private Sector
A. Dimitrova (2002)
Enlargement, Institution-Building and the EU's Administrative Capacity RequirementWest European Politics, 25
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the public administration (PA) development in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) from an ex post perspective covering the past three decades.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews prior literature on CEE and PA paradigms. The authors propose to distinguish between four main phases of public sector development in new democracies: post-communist transition, EU accession, post-accession fine-tuning, and e-governance.FindingsThere were many common features in the polities and PAs of the CEE countries at the beginning of the 1990s because of their common communist legacy, and also during the EU accession period, stemming from the “administrative capacity” requirement by the EU. However, domestic decisions of individual CEE governments following accession have moved them apart from each other. While some CEE countries face reversals of democratic public governance reforms, others are leading e-government initiatives – the current phase of public sector development.Research limitations/implicationsThe choice of countries is limited to the new member states of the European Union.Originality/valueThe paper shows that it is increasingly difficult to generalize findings, let alone to offer recommendations, that apply to all CEE countries. This is likely to lead to an end of a specific CEE administrative tradition as previously conceptualized in academic literature.
International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 14, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.