Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sarah Landale, D. Best (2013)
Dynamic shifts in social networks and normative values in recovery from an offending and drug using lifestyle
R. Wilton, G. DeVerteuil (2006)
Spaces of sobriety/sites of power: examining social model alcohol recovery programs as therapeutic landscapes.Social science & medicine, 63 3
(2009)
Peer-Based Addiction Recovery Support: History, Theory, Practice, and Scientific
J. McKnight, Peter Block (2010)
The Abundant Community: Awakening the Power of Families and Neighborhoods
(2010)
The potential of recovery capital”, RSA Projects
G. Leon (2000)
The Therapeutic Community
(2014)
Strengths, Support, Setbacks and Solutions, Pavilion Publishing, Brighton
J. Knote (2004)
Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American communityJournal of The American College of Radiology, 1
D. Best, M. Savic (2014)
Substance abuse and offending: Pathways to recovery
W. Vanderplasschen, K. Colpaert, M. Autrique, R. Rapp, S. Pearce, E. Broekaert, S. Vandevelde (2013)
Therapeutic Communities for Addictions: A Review of Their Effectiveness from a Recovery-Oriented PerspectiveThe Scientific World Journal, 2013
(1999)
Introduction”, Therapeutic Landscapes: The Dynamics between Place and
Robert Granfield, W. Cloud (2001)
SOCIAL CONTEXT AND “NATURAL RECOVERY”: THE ROLE OF SOCIAL CAPITAL IN THE RESOLUTION OF DRUG-ASSOCIATED PROBLEMSSubstance Use & Misuse, 36
J. Kretzmann (1995)
Building communities from the inside out.C.H.A.C. review, 23 2
Teodora Groshkova, D. Best, W. White (2013)
The Assessment of Recovery Capital: properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths.Drug and alcohol review, 32 2
John Kretzman, J. McKnight (1993)
Building Communities from the Inside Out: A Path Toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community's Assets
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to test the feasibility of utilising an Asset-Based Community Development (ABCD) model in the context of an Alcohol and Other Drug Therapeutic Community, and to use this as a way of assessing how TCs can contribute to the local communities in which they are sited. Design/methodology/approach – This is a qualitative action research project, based on an evolving model in which key stakeholders from participating sites were instrumental in shaping processes and activities, that is a partnership between a research centre, Turning Point in Melbourne, Australia and two Recovery Services operated by the Salvation Army Australia Eastern Territory (TSA). One of these is the Dooralong Transformation Centre on the Central Coast of New South Wales and the other, Fairhaven, is in the Gold Coast hinterland of Queensland, Australia. The project was designed to create “rehabilitation without walls” by building bridges between the treatment centres and the communities they are based in, and improving participation in local community life. This was done through a series of structured workshops that mapped community asset networks and planned further community engagement activities. Findings – Both of the TCs already had strong connections in their local areas including but not restricted to involvement with the mutual aid fellowships. Staff, residents and ex-residents still in contact with the service were strongly committed to community engagement and were able to identify a wide range of connections in the community and to build these around existing Salvation Army connections and networks. Research limitations/implications – This is a pilot study with limited research findings and no assessment of the generalisability of this method to other settings or TCs. Practical implications – Both TCs are able to act as “community resources” through which residents and ex-residents are able to give back to their local communities and develop the social and community capital that can prepare them for reintegration and can positively contribute to the experience of living in the local community. Social implications – This paper has significant ramifications for how TCs engage with their local communities both as a mechanism for supporting resident re-entry and also to challenge stigma and discrimination. Originality/value – The paper and project extend the idea of ABCD to a Reciprocal Community Development model in which TCs can act as active participants in their lived communities and by doing so can create a “therapeutic landscape for recovery”.
Therapeutic Communities The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 2, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.