Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Chevrollier, Jianhong Zhang, T. Leeuwen, A. Nijhof (2020)
The predictive value of strategic orientation for ESG performance over timeCorporate Governance, 20
P. Bansal, Hee‐Chan Song (2017)
Similar But Not the Same: Differentiating Corporate Sustainability from Corporate ResponsibilityThe Academy of Management Annals, 11
G. Reyes (2017)
Beyond the “Win-Win”California Management Review, 59
Thomas Dyllick, K. Muff (2016)
Clarifying the Meaning of Sustainable BusinessOrganization & Environment, 29
(2019)
Resultati issledovanija ‘lideri korporativnoy blagotvoritelnosti’ 2019
Olga Kolmar, A. Sakharov (2019)
Prospects of Implementation of the UN SDG in RussiaInternational Organisations Research Journal
N. Landrum (2018)
Stages of Corporate Sustainability: Integrating the Strong Sustainability WorldviewOrganization & Environment, 31
J. Meuer, Julian Koelbel, V. Hoffmann (2020)
On the Nature of Corporate SustainabilityOrganization & Environment, 33
Matt Eyring, Mark Johnson, Hair Nair (2011)
Nuevos modelos de negocios en los mercados emergentesHarvard Business Review, 89
Y. Blagov, Yulia Aray (2019)
The emergence of social entrepreneurship in RussiaSocial Enterprise Journal
D. Griggs, M. Stafford-Smith, O. Gaffney, J. Rockström, M. Öhman, P. Shyamsundar, W. Steffen, G. Glaser, N. Kanie, I. Noble (2013)
Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planetNature, 495
M. Porter, M. Kramer (2019)
Creating Shared ValueHarvard Business Review, 36
A. Williams, G. Whiteman, J. Parker (2019)
Backstage Interorganizational Collaboration: Corporate Endorsement of the Sustainable Development Goals, 5
K. Christ, R. Burritt, Mohsen Varsei (2017)
Coopetition as a Potential Strategy for Corporate SustainabilityBusiness Strategy and The Environment, 26
A. Carroll (1999)
Corporate Social ResponsibilityBusiness & Society, 38
D. Swanson (1995)
Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance ModelAcademy of Management Review, 20
Connie Byl, Natalie Slawinski (2015)
Embracing Tensions in Corporate SustainabilityOrganization & Environment, 28
Nils Høgevold, G. Svensson (2016)
Framing the development and directions of business sustainability effortsCorporate Governance, 16
P. Bansal (2019)
Sustainable Development in an Age of DisruptionAcademy of Management Discoveries
Marjo Siltaoja (2014)
Revising the Corporate Social Performance Model – Towards Knowledge Creation for Sustainable DevelopmentBusiness Strategy and The Environment, 23
Tobias Hahn, F. Figge, J. Pinkse, Lutz Preuss (2018)
A Paradox Perspective on Corporate Sustainability: Descriptive, Instrumental, and Normative AspectsJournal of Business Ethics, 148
Y. Blagov, A. Petrova-Savchenko (2012)
Corporate philanthropy in Russia: evidence from a national awards competitionCorporate Governance, 12
P. Pradhan, L. Costa, D. Rybski, W. Lucht, J. Kropp (2017)
A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) InteractionsEarth's Future, 5
Ivan Montiel, Javier Delgado-Ceballos (2014)
Defining and Measuring Corporate SustainabilityOrganization & Environment, 27
Ivan Montiel (2008)
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate SustainabilityOrganization & Environment, 21
C. França, G. Broman, K. Robèrt, G. Basile, Louise Trygg (2017)
An approach to business model innovation and design for strategic sustainable developmentJournal of Cleaner Production, 140
Thomas Dyllick, Kai Hockerts (2002)
Beyond the business case for corporate sustainabilityBusiness Strategy and The Environment, 11
M. Stafford-Smith, D. Griggs, O. Gaffney, F. Ullah, B. Reyers, N. Kanie, B. Stigson, P. Shrivastava, M. Leach, D. O’Connell (2016)
Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development GoalsSustainability Science, 12
S. Morioka, M. Carvalho (2016)
A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into businessJournal of Cleaner Production, 136
D. Wood (2010)
Measuring Corporate Social Performance: A ReviewERN: Governance & Ownership (Topic)
D. Wood (1991)
Corporate Social Performance RevisitedAcademy of Management Review, 16
E. Dolgikh, V. Erlitch (2018)
Ustoychivoe rasvitiye. Rol’ Rossii
Wendy Tate, Lydia Bals (2018)
Achieving Shared Triple Bottom Line (TBL) Value Creation: Toward a Social Resource-Based View (SRBV) of the FirmJournal of Business Ethics, 152
R. Baumgartner (2014)
Managing Corporate Sustainability and CSR: A Conceptual Framework Combining Values, Strategies and Instruments Contributing to Sustainable DevelopmentCorporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21
Y.E. Blagov, A.E. Dynin, E.A. Ivanova, A.E. Kostin, S.E. Litovchenko, Y.V. Ovchinnikova, S.P. Peregudov, A.A. Savchenko, Y.A. Vedenyapina (2008)
Report on social investments in Russia – 2008: integrating CSR principles into corporate strategy
The purpose of this paper is to explore the current status and identify the main trends in leading Russian companies’ corporate sustainability model transformation in the context of achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs).Design/methodology/approachA theoretical approach is based on the interpretation of corporate sustainability model transformation within the corporate social performance (CSP) framework. The corporate sustainability model is described according to Dyllick and Muff (2016) business sustainability (BST) 1.0-3.0 spectrum. The analysis is settled on survey data collected from leading Russian companies participated in the “Report on Social Investments in Russia” project conducted by the Russian Managers Association from 2008 to 2019.FindingsThis paper finds that the BST 2.0 is becoming a dominant model based on the “creating shared value” goal. The related CSP is characterized by their orientation to the principles of the UN Global Compact; by the emergence of a coordinating role for specialized departments of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and/or sustainability; and by the regular sustainability reporting. The SDGs are generally correlated with responsible business practices that are already in existence in companies. The emerging trend towards the advanced BST 3.0 model including the SDGs integration into the main business processes is constrained by the lack of active cooperation between companies.Research limitations/implicationsThe research sample includes only large Russian companies with a significant industry diversity, participating in the “Report on Social Investments in Russia” project, thereby restricting the analysis of non-participants. The relatively low repetition of participants in this long-term project does also restrict the degree of generalization. Future research could be based on the findings of this paper to create and test hypotheses via a nationwide study of Russian businesses as well as cross-national comparative studies.Practical implicationsThe analysis of the corporate sustainability model transformation through studying the key CSP framework elements could support Russian companies in creating systemic changes of their principles, processes and outcomes measurements in the context of achieving the UN SDGs.Originality/valueThis study contributes to existing literature by combining the corporate sustainability model transformation analysis with the CSP framework. It describes the experience of large Russian companies that publicly position themselves as national leaders in the field of CSR and sustainable development.
Corporate Governance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 11, 2020
Keywords: Corporate sustainability; Corporate strategy; Corporate social performance; Corporate social responsibility; Sustainable development goals; Russia
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.