Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The strength and quality of climate perceptions

The strength and quality of climate perceptions Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether and how climate strength and quality are related to employee commitment above and beyond individual climate perceptions. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 48 work units in organizations from different branches of industry. A total of 419 employees completed a questionnaire. Findings – Climate quality was related to commitment above and beyond individual climate perceptions. However, this concerned the climate dimensions of cooperation and innovation, but not reward. Climate strength moderated the relationship between individual cooperation and innovation perceptions, and commitment. Research limitations/implications – This study emphasizes the importance of group‐level perceptions as related to employee commitment. Because of the cross‐sectional design, conclusions about the causal order of the variables cannot be drawn. Practical implications – If organizations want to increase employees' commitment they should put the more skeptical employees in positive work environments, thus, in units of higher cooperation and innovation quality. Social implications – People are sensitive to the evaluative tone of their social environment. Originality/value – The paper is the first to examine the combined relationships of individual climate perceptions, climate‐strength, and climate quality with employee commitment. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Managerial Psychology Emerald Publishing

The strength and quality of climate perceptions

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-strength-and-quality-of-climate-perceptions-V6CPJkHW1A
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0268-3946
DOI
10.1108/02683941111099637
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether and how climate strength and quality are related to employee commitment above and beyond individual climate perceptions. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected from 48 work units in organizations from different branches of industry. A total of 419 employees completed a questionnaire. Findings – Climate quality was related to commitment above and beyond individual climate perceptions. However, this concerned the climate dimensions of cooperation and innovation, but not reward. Climate strength moderated the relationship between individual cooperation and innovation perceptions, and commitment. Research limitations/implications – This study emphasizes the importance of group‐level perceptions as related to employee commitment. Because of the cross‐sectional design, conclusions about the causal order of the variables cannot be drawn. Practical implications – If organizations want to increase employees' commitment they should put the more skeptical employees in positive work environments, thus, in units of higher cooperation and innovation quality. Social implications – People are sensitive to the evaluative tone of their social environment. Originality/value – The paper is the first to examine the combined relationships of individual climate perceptions, climate‐strength, and climate quality with employee commitment.

Journal

Journal of Managerial Psychology – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 25, 2011

Keywords: Individual perception; Quality; Organizations; Organizational culture; Employee attitudes

References

  • Within‐group agreement, non‐independence, and reliability. Implications for data aggregation and analysis
    Bliese, P.D.
  • Group consensus and psychological well‐being: a large field study
    Bliese, P.D.; Halverson, R.R.
  • On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement
    Burke, N.J.; Finkelstein, L.M.; Dusig, M.S.
  • New directions in social comparison research
    Buunk, B.P.; Mussweiler, T.
  • Climate perceptions matter: a meta‐analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes
    Carr, J.Z.; Schmidt, A.M.; Ford, J.K.; DeShon, R.P.
  • Comparing group and individual level assessments of job characteristics in testing the job demand‐control model: a multilevel approach
    De Jonge, J.; Van Breukelen, G.J.P.; Landeweerd, J.A.; Nijhuis, F.J.N.
  • When organizational climate is unambiguous, it is also strong
    Dickson, M.W.; Resick, C.J.; Hanges, P.J.
  • Accurate tests of statistical significance for r wg and average deviation interrater agreement indexes
    Dunlap, W.P.; Burke, M.J.; Smith‐Crowe, K.
  • A theory of social comparison processes
    Festinger, L.
  • An examination of the antecedents and moderator influences of climate strength
    González‐Romá, V.; Peiró, J.M.; Tordera, N.
  • Minority influence on focal and related attitudes: change in size, attributions, and information processing
    Gordijn, E.H.; De Vries, N.K.; De Dreu, C.K.W.
  • ‘Saying is believing’ effects: When sharing reality about something biases knowledge and evaluations
    Higgins, E.T.
  • The essential impact of context on organizational behavior
    Johns, G.
  • Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within‐group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment
    Klein, K.J.; Conn, A.B.; Smith, D.B.; Sorra, J.S.
  • Climate quality and climate consensus as mediators of the relationship between organizational antecedents and outcomes
    Lindell, M.K.; Brandt, C.J.
  • Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta‐analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences
    Meyer, J.P.; Stanley, D.J.; Herscovitch, L.; Topolnytsky, L.
  • The interaction of person and situation
    Mischel, W.
  • The measurement of affective commitment
    Mowday, R.T.; Steers, R.M.; Porter, L.W.
  • The effects of climate and personnel influences on individual behavior and attitudes in organizations
    Ostroff, C.
  • Sources of meaning, organizations, and culture
    Peterson, M.F.; Smith, P.B.
  • Common method variance in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies
    Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.M.; Lee, J.; Podsakoff, N.P.
  • Hierarchical Linear Models. Applications and Data Analysis Methods
    Raudenbush, A.S.; Bryk, S.
  • Location, location, location: contextualizing organizational research
    Rousseau, D.; Fried, Y.
  • Climate strength: a new direction for climate research
    Schneider, B.; Salvaggio, A.N.; Subirats, M.
  • Organizational climate systems and psychological climate perceptions: a cross‐level study of climate‐satisfaction relationships
    Schulte, M.; Ostroff, C.; Kinicky, A.J.
  • The relationship between organizational climate and employee perceptions of involvement: the importance of support
    Shadur, M.A.; Kienzie, R.; Rodwell, J.J.
  • Method variance in organizational research: truth or urban legend?
    Spector, P.E.
  • Three kinds of opinion comparison: the triadic model
    Suls, J.; Martin, R.; Wheeler, L.
  • Organizational socialization: the missing link between employee needs and organizational culture
    Taormina, R.J.
  • Person‐organization fit: the match between newcomers' and recruiters' preferences for organizational cultures
    Van Vianen, A.E.M.
  • Extending the social information processing perspective: new links to attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions
    Zalesny, M.D.; Ford, J.K.
  • Multilevel model of safety climate: cross‐level relationships between organization and group‐level climates
    Zohar, D.; Luria, G.