Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Tuukka Ylä-Anttila (2018)
Populist knowledge: ‘Post-truth’ repertoires of contesting epistemic authoritiesEuropean Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 5
L. Zoonen (2012)
I-Pistemology: Changing truth claims in popular and political culture:European Journal of Communication, 27
(2015)
Conservatism and the extreme right in Europe and Brazil
J. Bavel, Katherine Baicker, Paulo Boggio, V. Capraro, A. Cichocka, A. Cichocka, M. Cikara, M. Crockett, A. Crum, K. Douglas, James Druckman, J. Drury, Oeindrila Dube, N. Ellemers, E. Finkel, J. Fowler, M. Gelfand, Shihui Han, S. Haslam, J. Jetten, S. Kitayama, D. Mobbs, L. Napper, D. Packer, Gordon Pennycook, Ellen Peters, R. Petty, David Rand, S. Reicher, S. Schnall, A. Shariff, L. Skitka, S. Smith, C. Sunstein, Nassim Tabri, Joshua Tucker, S. Linden, P. Lange, Kim Weeden, Michael Wohl, Jamil Zaki, S. Zion, Robb Willer (2020)
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic responseNature Human Behaviour, 4
V. Suárez-Lledó, J. Álvarez-Gálvez (2019)
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic ReviewJournal of Medical Internet Research, 23
(2020)
Liberalism in the Anthropocene
(2022)
The denial of science in the antisystem populist rhetoric
C. Martini (2018)
Ad Hominem Arguments, Rhetoric, and Science CommunicationStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 55
The case studies were examined in the context of a lack of confidence in what constitutes truth and knowledge.Design/methodology/approachA case study design taken examining specific instances where the emergence of populist political tactics in an unfettered media world has undermined public belief in what counts as knowledge and to cast doubt on the validity of the idea of truth.FindingsFrom the examples used, it was seen that not just scholarship, but scholars themselves, found themselves under attack when presenting views that, however rigorously reasoned and supported by research fact, were deemed unacceptable by the extreme political right.Practical implicationsThe knowledge creation purpose of universities is under threat and “business as usual” as a response will not address that threat.Originality/valueThis calls into question the future of universities and their professoriates in a post-truth world and asks what the academy can do to adapt to continue serve the common good when knowledge gives way to the powerful influence of the evidence-free rhetorical sound bite in the formulation of public policy and public opinion.
On the Horizon – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 2, 2023
Keywords: Populism; Political right; Social media; Post-truth; Scholarship under attack
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.