Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Nicholas, A. Watkinson, Chérifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo, Jie Xu, A. Abrizah, Marzena Świgoń, Eti Herman (2017)
Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of changeLearned Publishing, 30
Hamid Jamali (2017)
Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articlesScientometrics, 112
Laura Mullen, J. Otto (2015)
The Rutgers Open Access Policy: Implementation Planning for Success
(2016)
Implementation Planning for Success. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML), 4 (March
Laura Mullen, David Ross (2016)
Publishers and Institutional Repositories--Forging a Future that Facilitates Green Open Access for Researchers, Funders and Institutionsagainst the grain, 28
(2014)
Open access policymaking: roles for academics as ‘change agents’ in research institutions
J. Otto (2016)
A Resonant Message: Aligning Scholar Values and Open Access Objectives in OA Policy Outreach to Faculty and Graduate StudentsJournal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 4
J. Bohannon (2016)
Who's downloading pirated papers? Everyone.Science, 352 6285
D. Chawla (2017)
Unpaywall finds free versions of paywalled papersNature
PurposeFrom laying the groundwork for the successful passage of a university-wide open access (OA) policy, through the development and planning that goes into a successful implementation, to “Day One” when the official university policy goes into effect, there is a long list of factors that affect faculty interest, participation and compliance. The paper aims to discuss this issue.Design/methodology/approachThe authors, Mullen and Otto, having detailed earlier aspects of the Rutgers University OA policy passage and implementation planning, analyze and share the specifics that followed the rollout of the policy and that continue to affect participation.FindingsThis case study presents some strategies and systems used to enhance author self-archiving in the newly minted Scholarly Open Access at Rutgers (SOAR) portal of the Rutgers institutional repository, including involvement of departmental liaison librarians, effective presentation of metrics and a focus on targeted communication with faculty.Originality/valueRoadblocks encountered as faculty began to deposit their scholarship and lessons learned are a focus. Early reaction from faculty and graduate students (doctoral students and postdocs) to various aspects of the policy as well as the use of SOAR for depositing their work are included.
Library Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 14, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.