The role of emotion in decision‐making

The role of emotion in decision‐making Purpose – This review of the decision‐making literature aims to challenge the rational model of decision‐making upon which the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 is premised. Design/methodology/approach – The paper forms part of a larger study commissioned by the Office of the Public Guardian looking into complex cases. Findings – The literature supported the study findings that decisions are not made in a linear way and identified the importance of history and memory, motivation and drive, mood and stability, and openness to influence when assessing the mental capacity of vulnerable people, especially in the context of self‐neglect. Practical implications – This paper will inform workers in health and social care about the emotional factors that influence decision‐making and increase their ability to make nuanced assessments. Social implications – Taken together, with other publications from this project, this paper alerts practitioners to situations where vulnerable people are out of their depth; when the role of depression and anxiety may be at least as salient as their understanding of possible consequences and when the past may exert more control over their actions than their understanding of future options. Originality/value – The paper's added value is that it uses ideas that are current within academic psychology to make explicit some of the factors that lead to complexity when assessing mental capacity under the MCA, especially in the context of self‐neglect. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Adult Protection Emerald Publishing

The role of emotion in decision‐making

The Journal of Adult Protection, Volume 13 (4): 9 – Aug 15, 2011

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-role-of-emotion-in-decision-making-rweQWKoe82
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1466-8203
D.O.I.
10.1108/14668201111177932
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This review of the decision‐making literature aims to challenge the rational model of decision‐making upon which the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 is premised. Design/methodology/approach – The paper forms part of a larger study commissioned by the Office of the Public Guardian looking into complex cases. Findings – The literature supported the study findings that decisions are not made in a linear way and identified the importance of history and memory, motivation and drive, mood and stability, and openness to influence when assessing the mental capacity of vulnerable people, especially in the context of self‐neglect. Practical implications – This paper will inform workers in health and social care about the emotional factors that influence decision‐making and increase their ability to make nuanced assessments. Social implications – Taken together, with other publications from this project, this paper alerts practitioners to situations where vulnerable people are out of their depth; when the role of depression and anxiety may be at least as salient as their understanding of possible consequences and when the past may exert more control over their actions than their understanding of future options. Originality/value – The paper's added value is that it uses ideas that are current within academic psychology to make explicit some of the factors that lead to complexity when assessing mental capacity under the MCA, especially in the context of self‐neglect.

Journal

The Journal of Adult ProtectionEmerald Publishing

Published: Aug 15, 2011

Keywords: Mental capacity; Decision making; Vulnerable adult; Neglect; Self‐neglect; Service‐refusal; Psychology; Depression

References

  • Insecure attachment states: their relationship to borderline and narcissistic personality disorders and treatment process in cognitive analytic therapy
    Jellema, A.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off