Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Senge (1997)
THE FIFTH DISCIPLINEMeasuring Business Excellence, 1
E. Minelli, G. Rebora, M. Turri, J. Huisman (2006)
The Impact of Research and Teaching Evaluation in Universities: Comparing an Italian and a Dutch caseQuality in Higher Education, 12
B. O'Connell (2004)
Enron. Con: “He that filches from me my good name … makes me poor indeed”Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15
S. Ghoshal (2005)
Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management PracticesAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 4
Keith Mcmillan (2004)
Trust and the virtues: a solution to the accounting scandals?Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15
S. Cohen, R. Brand (1993)
Total quality management in government
D. Skinner (2004)
Primary and Secondary Barriers to the Evaluation of ChangeEvaluation, 10
C. Oliver (1991)
STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSESAcademy of Management Review, 16
C. Bartlett, S. Ghoshal (2002)
Building Competitive Advantage Through PeopleMIT Sloan Management Review, 43
J. Dillard (2002)
Dialectical possibilities of thwarted responsibilitiesCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 13
M. Barzelay (1996)
Performance auditing and the new public management: changing roles and strategies of central audit institutions
C. Hood (1991)
A PUBLIC MANAGEMENT FOR ALL SEASONSPublic Administration, 69
A. Wildavsky (1972)
The Self-Evaluating OrganizationPublic Administration Review, 32
D. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, M. Rosa (2007)
Quality Assurance In Higher Education
N. Stame (1990)
Valutazione "ex-post" e conseguenze inattese
S. Thiel, F. Leeuw (2002)
The Performance Paradox in the Public SectorPublic Performance & Management Review, 25
L. Spira, M. Page (2003)
Risk Management: The Reinvention of Internal Control and the Changing Role of Internal AuditAuditing
M. Power (1997)
The audit society : rituals of verificationOUP Catalogue
G. Capano (2003)
Administrative Traditions and Policy Change: When Policy Paradigms Matter. The Case of Italian Administrative Reform During the 1990sPublic Administration, 81
Harlow Cohen (1998)
The performance paradoxAcademy of Management Perspectives, 12
C. Pollitt (2000)
Public Management Reform
M. Power (2003)
Auditing and the production of legitimacyAccounting Organizations and Society, 28
Vicky Hoffman, Jennifer Joe, Donald Moser (2003)
The effect of constrained processing on auditors’ judgmentsAccounting Organizations and Society, 28
Gary Hamel, C. Prahalad (1994)
Competing for the Future
I. Bleiklie (1998)
Justifying the Evaluative State : New Public Management ideals in higher educationEuropean Journal of Education, 33
M. Patton (1997)
Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century textEvaluation and Program Planning, 1
Walter Powell, Paul DiMaggio, Lorenza Chiesara (2001)
Il neoistituzionalismo nell’analisi organizzativa
S. Ghoshal, C. Bartlett (2007)
Linking organizational context and managerial action: The dimensions of quality of managementSouthern Medical Journal, 15
A. Ritter (2008)
Speaking truth to power.Drug and alcohol review, 27 2
C. Pollitt (2006)
Performance Information for DemocracyEvaluation, 12
C. Grey (2003)
The Real World of Enron's AuditorsOrganization, 10
J. Broadbent, Jennifer Roberts, M. Dietrich (1997)
The End of the Professions?: The Restructuring of Professional Work
M. Noordegraaf, T. Abma (2003)
Management by Measurement? Public Management Practices Amidst AmbiguityPublic Administration, 81
R. Brown (2004)
Quality Assurance in Higher Education: The UK Experience Since 1992
D. Hayes, R. Wynyard (2002)
The McDonaldization of higher education
E. Minelli, G. Rebora, M. Turri (2005)
VALUTARE O MISURARE I RISULTATI? IL CASO DELL'UNIVERSITÀ
M. Pidd (2005)
Perversity in public service performance measurementInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54
W. Brown (2001)
Faculty Participation in University Governance and the Effects on University PerformanceJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44
S. Shapiro (1987)
The Social Control of Impersonal TrustAmerican Journal of Sociology, 93
M. Turri (2005)
La valutazione dell’Università: un’analisi dell’impatto istituzionale e organizzativo
C. Pollitt, G. Bouckaert (1995)
Quality improvement in European public services : concepts, cases and commentary
I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi (1995)
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How
R. Rhodes (1994)
THE HOLLOWING OUT OF THE STATE: THE CHANGING NATURE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE IN BRITAINThe Political Quarterly, 65
C. Argyris (1985)
Strategy, change, and defensive routines
C. Baker, R. Hayes (2004)
Reflecting form over substance: the case of Enron Corp.Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15
Martin Parker, David Jary (1995)
The McUniversity: Organization, Management and Academic SubjectivityOrganization, 2
K. Weick (1976)
Educational organizations as loosely coupled systemsGestión y Estrategia
M. Turri (2003)
Lo stato dell’arte, limiti ed evoluzione nella valutazione a livello di sistema e di singolo ateneo
Evert Vedung (1997)
Public Policy and Program Evaluation
M. Power (2004)
The risk management of everything: rethinking the politics of uncertainty
J. Froud, S. Johal, Viken Papazian, K. Williams (2004)
The temptation of Houston: a case study of financialisationCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 15
C. Argyris, Donald Schön (1978)
Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective
R. Kaplan, D. Norton (1996)
The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action
Henry Mintzberg (1983)
Power in and Around Organizations
Marshall Meyer, J. Pfeffer (1982)
Power in Organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly, 28
C. Pollitt (2003)
The Essential Public Manager
S. Taut, Dieter Brauns (2003)
Resistance to EvaluationEvaluation, 9
G. Vickers (1995)
The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making
P. Hirsch (2003)
The Dark Side of Alliances: The Enron StoryOrganization, 10
Peter Smith (1995)
On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sectorInternational Journal of Public Administration, 18
G. Rebora, R. Ruffini (2001)
Manuale di organizzazione aziendale
Purpose – The aims of the paper are to: present a theoretical framework for analysing the functioning and consequences of control systems; understand and compare the structure and impact of control systems on two Italian public administrations also in relation to possible situations of crisis and failure; and examine the possible link between the organisational impact of control systems (and their failure if this is the case) and the characteristics of the sectors involved. Design/methodology/approach – The proposed theoretical framework (analysis of the concept, methods, bodies, uses, coherence and impact of control) is applied through a parallel examination of two cases: control systems in Italian universities and ministries over the past 15 years. The objective is to understand why similar rules concerning control systems bring about different consequences and results. Findings – Analysis over a 15 years period shows the effects of two very different strategic approaches and organisational choices in the face of very similar rules. Acceptance or otherwise of control, professional ability and competence, coherence between methods and the object of control and transparency all appear as discriminating factors in the failure or success of control systems. In universities, taking advantage of existing knowledge and professional skills, combining new internationally recognised assessment techniques with academic tradition and culture, focusing methods on specific activities such as teaching and research and arousing attention through transparency of evaluation outputs are the main factors which keep the risk of failure at bay. Evaluation has to cope with the allocation of resource and power issues, but is beginning to take on importance in change management. On the other hand, the case of the ministries shows how the new public management‐type of control exist in a closed cultural context where methods and instruments are taken up without adapting to core processes and where there is secrecy regarding control outputs. Research limitations/implications – This is an exploratory study that will have to be confirmed by further verification in the future that could include new cases to make the analysis even more exhaustive. The subject of the paper does not lend itself to quantitative studies. Practical implications – Not to concentrate only on the methodological aspects of control activities, but also focus on all those features of control systems that permit the actual use of output and bring about concrete results in public administrations. Originality/value – In the past few years, control systems have very often been introduced into the public sector without paying enough attention to how they really work and their true outcome. This paper faces the problem by putting forward a theoretical framework and empirical evidence that may be used by the academic world and public administration.
Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 21, 2008
Keywords: Control systems; Universities; Change management; Public sector organizations; Italy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.