Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Kelly, Murray , M., David , L. (2004)
Project briefing: practiceArchitect’s Handbook of Construction Project Management
M. Bell (2018)
How is that even possible?” Raising construction regulation from the ashes of grenfell tower
(2018a)
Strengthening consumer redress in the housing market: a consultation
L. McKenna, J. Charlson (2015)
The contract (rights of third parties) act 1999 versus collateral warranties in the UK construction industryConstruction Law Journal, 26
D. Mosey (2017)
Improving value through the FAC-1 framework alliance contract
D. Clarke, S Bright, J Dewar (1998)
Occupying ‘cheek by jowl’: property issues arising from communal living’Land Law: Themes and Perspectives
P. Sissons (2014)
Is talk cheap? After Daejan Investments Ltd v Benson can landlords buy themselves out of consulting with tenants under s.20 of the landlord and tenant act 1985 and what should be the price of doing so?The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 2
P. Britton, M. Fairweather (2009)
The walk to paradise gardens: flat-owners and building defects
S. Blandy, S. Blandy, A. Dupuis, J. Dixon (2010)
Legal frameworks for multi-owned housing in England and Wales: owners’ experiencesMulti-Owned Housing: Law, Power and Practice
R. Heckroodt (2002)
Guide to the deterioration and failure of building materials
H. Carr (2011)
The Right to Buy, the Leaseholder, and the Impoverishment of OwnershipWiley-Blackwell: Journal of Law & Society
Alice Christudason (1996)
Subdivided Buildings—Developments in Australia, Singapore and EnglandInternational and Comparative Law Quarterly, 45
R. Crozier (2013)
Daejan v Benson – misplaced intent?Landlord and Tenant Review, 17
Susan Bright, D. Weatherall, R. Willis (2019)
Exploring the complexities of energy retrofit in mixed tenure social housing: a case study from England, UKEnergy Efficiency, 12
M. Bounds, S Blandy, A Dupuis, J Dixon (2010)
‘Governance and residential satisfaction in multi-owned developments in Sydney’Multi-Owned Housing: Law, Power and Practice
(1970)
Civil liability of vendors and lessors for defective premises
D. Cowan, H. Carr, A. Wallace (2018)
Ownership, Narrative, Things
J. Brokenshire (2018)
Statement on the publication of Dame Judith Hackitt’s final report following her independent review of building regulations and fire safety
Susan Bright, D. Weatherall (2017)
Framing and Mapping the Governance Barriers to Energy Upgrades in FlatsJournal of Environmental Law, 29
D. Johnson (2012)
Defective premises law: time for remedial works?Construction Law Journal, 28
(2018b)
Barratt developments agree to pay fire safety costs
M. Bell, W Jocic (2017)
Negligence Claims by Subsequent Building Owners: Did the Life of Bryan End Too Soon?Melbourne University Law Review, 41
S. Bright, D. Weatherall, R. Willis (2017)
A case study of deep retrofit in mixed tenure (rented and owned) UK social apartment blockspaper presented at ECEEE Summer Study 2017
P. Britton, J. Bailey (2011)
Domestic bliss or paradise lost? Consumer rights in construction in England and in Australia
A. Davies, S. Nicholls (2003)
Meriton fight leads to strata collapseSydney Morning Herald
B. Leroy, H Esmaeili, B Grigg (2016)
Strata title, community title and residential tenancies: changing how we liveThe Boundaries of Australian Property Law
J. Hackitt (2018)
Building a safer future: independent review of building regulations and fire safety: final report (CM9607)
P. Glover (2015)
Right-to-buy legacyMortgage Finance Gazette, 146
The owner of residential long leasehold can be significantly affected by construction operations to the building, whether during its initial construction or its subsequent repair, renovation or improvement. This paper aims to consider how a leaseholder has an interest in such construction operations and the extent to which this is taken into consideration in their procurement.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is a general review of how construction law interfaces with property law interests, rights and obligations in the case of a residential leaseholder. The first part of the paper outlines the issues raised by construction operations. The second part of the paper queries the efficacy of any right of redress the leaseholder might have in respect of construction defects. The third part considers the limited nature of the leaseholder’s right to be consulted about construction operations. The paper is predominantly doctrinal in approach, although it references socio-legal research. The paper also contrasts the English law position with Australia.FindingsThe paper concludes that leaseholders have limited input into the procurement of construction operations despite their interest in them. Property law can be used to regulate construction law operations.Originality/valueTo date, the literature dealing specifically with the position of leaseholders, consultation obligations and construction operations has been limited. This paper brings together property law and construction law in analysing the findings of the Hackitt Report into the Grenfell Tower disaster.
International Journal of Law in the Built Environment – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 17, 2019
Keywords: Defects; Leasehold; Property law; Construction law; Defective premises act 1972; Landlord and tenant act 1985
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.