Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Econometrica, 37
V. Henderson (2003)
The Urbanization Process and Economic Growth: The So-What QuestionJournal of Economic Growth, 8
Journal of Political Economy, 99
M. Calì, C. Menon (2013)
Does Urbanization Affect Rural Poverty? Evidence from Indian DistrictsDevelopment Economics: Microeconomic Issues in Developing Economies eJournal
E. Glaeser, S. Rosenthal, W. Strange (2009)
Urban Economics and EntrepreneurshipEwing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series
Journal of Urban Economics, 62
Economic Development and Cultural Change, 13
A. Ciccone, R. Hall (1993)
Productivity and the Density of Economic ActivityIO: Productivity
Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33
Marigee Bacolod, Bernardo Blum, W. Strange (2010)
Elements of Skill: Traits, Intelligences, Education, and AgglomerationLabor: Human Capital eJournal
J. Williamson (1965)
Regional Inequality and the Process of National Development: A Description of the PatternsEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 13
M. Pesaran, Ron Smith (1995)
Estimating Long-Run Relationships From Dynamic Heterogeneous PanelsJournal of Econometrics, 68
K. Im, M. Pesaran, Y. Shin (2003)
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panelsJournal of Econometrics, 115
European Economic Review, 46
David Castells‐Quintana, Vicente Royuela (2012)
Agglomeration, Inequality and Economic Growth: Cross-section and panel data analysis
Marius Brülhart, Federica Sbergami (2008)
Agglomeration and Growth: Cross-Country EvidenceCEPR Discussion Paper Series
Journal of Financial Economics, 78
D. Bloom, D. Canning, G. Fink (2008)
Urbanization and the Wealth of NationsScience, 319
J. Friedmann (2006)
Four Theses in the Study of China’s UrbanizationInternational Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30
Philippe Martin, G. Ottaviano (1999)
Growing locations: Industry location in a model of endogenous growthWorld Scientific Studies in International Economics
E. Kolomak (2012)
Urbanization and Economic Development in Russia
M. Pesaran, Y. Shin, Ron Smith (1999)
Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous PanelsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 94
J. Westerlund (2006)
Testing for Error Correction in Panel DataERN: Simulation Methods (Topic)
B. Cohen (2004)
Urban Growth in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Trends and a Caution Regarding Existing ForecastsWorld Development, 32
C. Condit, Paul Bairoch, Christopher Braider (1990)
Cities and Economic Development: From the Dawn of History to the Present by Paul Bairoch (review)Technology and Culture, 31
D. Persyn, J. Westerlund (2008)
Error-Correction–Based Cointegration Tests for Panel DataThe Stata Journal, 8
C. Granger (1969)
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
G. Maddala, Shaowen Wu (1999)
A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple TestOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61
Johannes Linn (1982)
The Costs of Urbanization in Developing CountriesEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 30
B. Lewis (2014)
Urbanization and Economic Growth in Indonesia: Good News, Bad News and (Possible) Local Government MitigationRegional Studies, 48
Luisito Bertinelli, D. Black (2004)
Urbanization and growthJournal of Urban Economics, 56
J. Driscoll, Aart Kraay (1998)
Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel DataReview of Economics and Statistics, 80
A. Scott (2009)
World Development Report 2009: reshaping economic geographyJournal of Economic Geography, 9
Alok Kumar, Brianne Kober (2012)
Urbanization, human capital, and cross-country productivity differencesEconomics Letters, 117
S. Alam, A. Fatima, M. Butt (2007)
Sustainable development in Pakistan in the context of energy consumption demand and environmental degradationJournal of Asian Economics, 18
United Nations (2007)
World population prospects: the 2006 Revision and World Urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision
I. Turok, G. Mcgranahan (2013)
Urbanization and economic growth: the arguments and evidence for Africa and AsiaEnvironment & Urbanization, 25
Daniel Mata, U. Deichmann, J. Henderson, S. Lall, H. Wang (2005)
Determinants of City Growth in BrazilLatin American Economics eJournal
J. Gallup, J. Sachs, A. Mellinger (1998)
Geography and Economic DevelopmentInternational Regional Science Review, 22
Masahisa Fujita, P. Krugman, Tomoya Mori (1999)
On the evolution of hierarchical urban systems1European Economic Review, 43
World Bank (2009)
10.30875/ccccd3de-en
P. Aghion, P. Howitt (2008)
The Economics of Growth
N. Leitão (2013)
A PANEL DATA MODELLING OF AGGLOMERATION AND GROWTH: CROSS-COUNTRY EVIDENCETheoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 8
Tim Loughran, P. Schultz (2004)
Liquidity: Urban Versus Rural FirmsSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
Gene Chang, J. Brada (2006)
The Paradox of China's Growing Under-UrbanizationEconomic Systems, 30
E. Glaeser (2013)
A World of Cities: The Causes and Consequences of Urbanization in Poorer CountriesBuilt Environment eJournal
In Choi (2001)
Unit root tests for panel dataJournal of International Money and Finance, 20
V. Henderson (2002)
Urban primacy, external costs, and quality of lifeResource and Energy Economics, 24
A. Ciccone (1999)
Agglomeration-Effects in EuropeEuropean Economics eJournal
H. Richardson (1987)
The Costs of Urbanization: A Four-Country ComparisonEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 35
Journal of Urban Economics, 67
M. Arellano, Stephen Bond (1991)
Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment EquationsThe Review of Economic Studies, 58
Remi Jedwab, Dietrich Vollrath (2015)
The Mortality Transition, Malthusian Dynamics, and the Rise of Poor Mega-Cities
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between urbanization and economic growth in ASEAN countries for the period 1993-2014.Design/methodology/approachThe Granger causality test and the regression estimation method with static and dynamic panel data (FE, RE, Driscoll and Kraay, D-GMM and PMG) were used. The sample includes seven ASEAN countries: Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam.FindingsThe results show that at least a causal relationship exists between urbanization and economic growth and urbanization positively impacts economic growth. However, the relationship between urbanization and economic growth is non-linear. The urbanization reaches a threshold after which it may impede the economic growth. The estimated threshold is 69.99 percent for the static model and 67.94 percent for the dynamic model.Research limitations/implicationsThe evidence from this study suggests that there is a non-linear relationship between urbanization and the economic growth. Urbanization has the potential to accelerate the economic growth, and this potential will depend on the establishment of favorable institutions and investments in appropriate public infrastructure.Practical implicationsThe decision on the model of urbanization needs to be based on social and environmental considerations as well as market-based economic efficiency. The quality of urbanization manifests in the way that people and businesses perceive when they come to cities and their position in the labor market, urban housing, niche commodity markets, supply chain, collaborative network and physical space for the operation of the business. Most ASEAN countries have not yet reached a high level of urbanization, despite having a number of policies for promoting urbanization to contribute to the economic growth. However, policymakers should find ways to facilitate the development of urbanization that contributes to economic growth, employment growth, environmental sustainability, rather than the pursuit of speeding up the process of urbanization.Originality/valueBetween urbanization and economic growth at least a causal relationship exists. Urbanization positively impacts economic growth. However, the relationship between urbanization and economic growth is non-linear. The urbanization reaches a threshold after which it may impede the economic growth. The estimated threshold is 69.99 percent for the static model and 67.94 percent for the dynamic model.
International Journal of Social Economics – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 12, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.