Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Patrik Säfvenblad (2000)
Trading volume and autocorrelation: Empirical evidence from the Stockholm Stock ExchangeJournal of Banking and Finance, 24
Black F. (1989)
10.3386/w2946
M. Mckenzie, R. Faff (2002)
The Determinants of Conditional Autocorrelation in Stock ReturnsJournal of Financial Research, 26
F. Black (1988)
An Equilibrium Model of the CrashNBER Macroeconomics Annual, 3
C. Corrado, T. Miller (2003)
The Forecast Quality of Cboe Implied Volatility IndexesDerivatives eJournal
G. Koutmos (1999)
Asymmetric Price and Volatility Adjustments in Emerging Asian Stock MarketsJournal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26
Toshiaki Watanabe (2002)
Margin requirements, positive feedback trading, and stock return autocorrelations: the case of JapanApplied Financial Economics, 12
F. Black (1989)
Mean Reversion and Consumption SmoothingNBER Working Paper Series
T. Andersen (1996)
Return Volatility and Trading Volume: An Information Flow Interpretation of Stochastic VolatilityJournal of Finance, 51
F. Westermann (2004)
Does the Euro affect the dynamic interactions of stock markets in Europe? Evidence from France, Germany and ItalyThe European Journal of Finance, 10
Enrique Sentana, S. Wadhwani (1992)
Feedback Traders and Stock Return Autocorrelations: Evidence from a Century of Daily DataThe Economic Journal, 102
G. Koutmos (1997)
Feedback trading and the autocorrelation pattern of stock returns: further empirical evidenceJournal of International Money and Finance, 16
Purpose – This paper empirically assesses the determinants of conditional stock index autocorrelation with particular emphasis on the impact of return volatility that are theoretically linked through the behaviour of feedback traders. Design/methodology/approach – The S&P 100, 500 and the NASDAQ 100 index are considered and volatility in each series is captured using option‐implied estimates taken from the Chicago Board Options Exchange. A seemingly unrelated regression approach is used in which trading volume and volatility are simultaneously modelled. Findings – The results of this study suggest that low or even negative return autocorrelations are more likely in situations where: return volatility is high; price falls by a large amount; traded stock volumes are high; and the economy is in a recessionary phase. Research limitations/implications – The results confirm that previous related work showing a link between autocorrelation and volatility is not induced by a mechanical relation. Practical implications – Usage of endogenously determined volatility measures in this area of the literature is justified. Originality/value – This study provides a robustness test of the autocorrelation/volatility relation, as well as a further exploration of the utility inherent in option‐implied volatility.
International Journal of Managerial Finance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 10, 2007
Keywords: Volatility; Stock markets; United States of America
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.