Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Shawne Miksa (2002)
Pigeonholes and punchcards : identifying the division between library classification research and information retrieval research, 1952-1970
Birger Hjørland (1999)
The DDC, the universe of knowledge, and the post‐modern libraryJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 50
Journal of Information Science Principles and Practice, 12
Journal of Documentation, 21
Classification Research Group (1956)
Classification Research Group Bulletin No. 1
Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 49
P. Richmond (1988)
Precedent-Setting Contributions to Modern ClassificationJ. Documentation, 44
Journal of Documentation, 30
P. Sandstrom (1999)
Information foraging among anthropologists in the invisible college of human behavioral ecology : an author co-citation analysis
Y. Soergel (2005)
ASIST SIG/CR Classification Workshop 2000: Classification for User Support and Learning, 27
B. Brookes (1974)
ROBERT FAIRTHORNE AND THE SCOPE OF INFORMATION SCIENCEJournal of Documentation, 30
M. Bowles (1999)
Crisis in the information age? : how the information explosion threatened science, democracy, the library, and the human body, 1945-1999
H. White, B. Griffith (1982)
Authors as markers of Intellectual Space: Co‐citation in studies of Science, Technology and SocietyJ. Documentation, 38
Classification Research Group (1955)
The need for a faceted classification as the basis for all methods of information retrievalLibrary Association Record, 57
J.S. Melton (1960)
A note on the compatibility of two information systems: Colon classification and Western Reserve University
B. Kyle (2005)
Privilege and public provision in the intellectual welfare stateJ. Documentation, 61
(2017)
About ISKO
I. Farkas-Conn (1984)
From documentation to information science : the beginnings and early development of the American Documentation Institute-American Society for Information Science
Wilson Library Bulletin, 35
R. Fairthorne (1962)
AN OUTSIDER INSIDE INFORMATION: USA 1961–1962, 14
K. McCain (1990)
Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overviewJ. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 41
D. Foskett (1964)
Science, humanism and libraries
Classification Research Group (1956)
Bibliography of papers on classification and allied subjectsJournal of Documentation, 12
Journal of Documentation, 12
V. Rajaraman, V. Bush (1945)
As we may thinkResonance, 5
A. Gilchrist (1997)
From Classification to "Knowledge Organization": Dorking Revisited or "Past is Prelude." FID Occasional Paper No. 14.
M. Afolabi (1983)
The literature of bibliographic classification: a citation study to determine the core literature
B. Vickery (1968)
Faceted classification : a guide to construction and use of special schemes
F. Dunkel, Khanjan Mehta, A. Harmon, Ada Giusti (2017)
Two Cultures and a Second Look: Humanities and Food Sciences
Sarah Huckaby (1972)
An Enquiry into the Theory of Integrative Levels as the Basis for a Generalized Classification Scheme.Journal of Documentation, 28
D. Austin (1969)
Prospects for a New General ClassificationJournal of Librarianship and Information Science, 1
J. Farradane (1952)
A SCIENTIFIC THEORY OF CLASSIFICATION AND INDEXING: FURTHER CONSIDERATIONSJournal of Documentation, 8
B. Kyle (1963)
Some searching questions on documentation researchAmerican Documentation, 14
A Center for Documentation and Communication Research at Western Reserve University (1955)
10.1002/asi.5090060308American Documentation, 6
Frederic Weinstein (1959)
Proceedings of the International Study Conference on Classification for Information Retrieval. Held at Beatrice Webb House, Dorking, England, 13th-17th May, 1957 (Book Review)College & Research Libraries, 20
G. Burnett, Michele Besant, E. Chatman (2001)
Small worlds: Normative behavior in virtual communities and feminist booksellingJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 52
D. Foskett (1962)
The Classification Research Group 1952—1962, 12
J. Farradane (1955)
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF CLASSIFICATIONJournal of Documentation, 11
A. Rees (1963)
SEMANTIC FACTORS, ROLE INDICATORS ET ALIA, 15
L. Spiteri (1995)
The Classification Research Group and the theory of integrative levels
Library Resources & Technical Services, 17
Bernard Frohmann (1983)
An Investigation of the Semantic Bases of Some Theoretical Principles of Classification Proposed by Austin and the CRGCataloging & Classification Quarterly, 4
H. White, K. McCain (1998)
Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 49
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50
Knowledge Organization, 27
Inder Puri, R. Arora (1988)
Professor Allen Kent's contribution in the field of librarianship a documentationHerald of library science, 27
D. Foskett (1988)
Brian Vickery a Personal MemoirJ. Documentation, 44
H. White, B. Griffith (1981)
Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structureJ. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 32
Percy Walker (1974)
ROBERT ARTHUR FAIRTHORNEJournal of Documentation, 30
Journal of Documentation, 54
Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41
Library Journal
D. Price (1965)
NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS.Science, 149 3683
B. Vickery (1959)
The structure of “semantic coding,” a reviewAmerican Documentation, 10
J. Rowley (1987)
Organizing Knowledge: An Introduction to Information Retrieval
Library Association Record, 55
W. Goffman, V. Newill (1964)
Generalization of Epidemic Theory: An Application to the Transmission of IdeasNature, 204
The purpose of this paper is to present the initial relationship between the Classification Research Group (CRG) and the Center for Documentation and Communication Research (CDCR) and how this relationship changed between 1952 and 1970. The theory of normative behavior and its concepts of worldviews, social norms, social types, and information behavior are used to characterize the relationship between the small worlds of the two groups with the intent of understanding the gap between early classification research and information retrieval (IR) research.Design/methodology/approachThis is a mixed method analysis of two groups as evidenced in published artifacts by and about their work. A thorough review of historical literature about the groups as well as their own published works was employed and an author co-citation analysis was used to characterize the conceptual similarities and differences of the two groups of researchers.FindingsThe CRG focused on fundamental principles to aid classification and retrieval of information. The CDCR were more inclined to develop practical methods of retrieval without benefit of good theoretical foundations. The CRG began it work under the contention that the general classification schemes at the time were inadequate for the developing IR mechanisms. The CDCR rejected the classification schemes of the times and focused on developing punch card mechanisms and processes that were generously funded by both government and corporate funding.Originality/valueThis paper provides a unique historical analysis of two groups of influential researchers in the field of library and information science.
Journal of Documentation – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 12, 2017
Keywords: Information retrieval; History; Classification; Citation analysis; Center for Documentation and Communication Research; Classification Research Group
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.