Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-reception-of-the-new-qing-history-in-china-confrontation-between-kIkkNDOVAv
References (38)
-
(2006)
满文档案与“新清史” (manchu archives and the “new qing history”)”, 故宫学术季刊 -
Ines Racknitz (2014)
Repositioning History for the Future ‐ Recent Academic Debates in ChinaHistory Compass, 12
-
Allen Chun (2012)
From Sinicization to Indigenization in the Social Sciences:: Is That All There Is? -
(2012)
新清史与“中华帝国”问题：有一次冲击与反应 (the new qing history and the question of the “Chinese empire”: another Action-Reaction)? -
(1994)
Translated by Burton Watson, Port Townsend -
Mario Cams (2016)
Recent Additions to the New Qing History DebateContemporary Chinese Thought, 47
-
L. Newby (2011)
China: Pax ManjuricaJournal for Eighteenth-century Studies, 34
-
(2016)
Xin Qing shi’ zhenglun: Cong He bingdi, luo youzhi lunzhan shuoqi “新清史”争论：从何炳棣, 罗友枝论战说起 -
P. Ho (1998)
In defense of Sinicization: A Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski's “Reenvisioning the Qing”The Journal of Asian Studies, 57
-
(2013)
21世纪如何书写中国历史 ：“新清史”研究的影响与回应 (how to write Chinese history in the 21st century: Influences and reactions in front of the “new qing history) -
(2004)
The diachronics of early qing visual and material culture -
(2011)
Qingdai Manren de ‘Zhongguo rentong -
(2018)
Yi jiu chong xin wanggu shishi: yi ‘xin qing shi’ ruogan guandian bianxi 以旧充新罔顾事实：一“新清史”若干观点辨析 -
Joanna Waley-Cohen (2004)
The New Qing HistoryRadical History Review, 88
-
E. Rawski (1996)
Presidential Address: Reenvisioning the Qing: The Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese HistoryThe Journal of Asian Studies, 55
-
Michael Weiers (2016)
The Lifanyuan: A Review Based on New Sources and Traditional Historiography -
F. Langfitt (2015)
Why a Chinese government think tank attacked American scholars -
Wei-ming Tu (2005)
Cultural China: the periphery as the centerDaedalus, 134
-
C. Geertz (1974)
"From the Native's Point of View": On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding, 28
-
(2012)
清代政治与国家认同 (politics of the qing dynasty and national identity) -
(2015)
新清史”：“新帝国主义”史学标本 (“new qing history”: a “neo-imperial” specimen of historiography) -
(2018)
Qing chao shi de jiben tezheng zai tanjiu: Yi dui beimei ‘xin qing shi’ guandian de fansi wei zhongxin 清朝史的基本特征再探究：一对北美“新清史”观点的反思为中心, zhongyang minzu daxue chubanshe -
Guo Wu (2016)
New Qing History: Dispute, Dialog, and InfluenceThe Chinese Historical Review, 23
-
Gang Zhao (2006)
Reinventing ChinaModern China, 32
-
(2006)
Manzhou zhi dao yu manzu hua de qing shi: Du Ou lide jiaoshou de ‘manzhou zhi dao: Baqi zhidu yu qingdai de minzu rentong’ 满洲之道与满族化的清史：读欧立德教授的 “满洲之道：八旗制度与清代的民族认同 -
S. Sen (2002)
The New Frontiers of Manchu China and the Historiography of Asian Empires: A Review EssayThe Journal of Asian Studies, 61
-
(2016)
葛兆光再谈“从周边看中国”“, Ge Zhaoguang et al., 殊方未远：古代中国的疆域, 民族与认同 (the exotic from not so far: Territory, nation and identity in ancient China), Beijing, Zhonghua shuju -
(2017)
Cong qingdai Man-Meng wen dang’an kan ‘feihan’ qunti de zhongguo guan 从清代满蒙文档案看“非汉”群体的中国观 -
Recent additions to the new qing history debate
ThoughtContemporary Chinese, 47
-
(2008)
由美国的“新清史”研究引发的感想 (reflections induced by the American “new qing history) -
R. Guy (2002)
Who Were the Manchus? A Review EssayThe Journal of Asian Studies, 61
-
(2006)
La chine moderne: Les Mandchous et la définition de la nation -
(2016)
新清史”背后的学风问题 (problems with the style of research behind the “New Qing history”)”, zhonguo shehui kexue bao 中国社会科学报 -
Mark Elliott (2006)
La Chine modern: Les Mandchous et la définition de la nationAnnales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 61
-
Andrew Nathan (1993)
Is Chinese Culture Distinctive?—A Review ArticleThe Journal of Asian Studies, 52
-
(2015)
不再说“汉化”的旧故事：我们可从“新清史”学习什么 (let’s stop talking about the old story of “sinicization”: what could be learned from the “new qing history”)?”, 东方早报 (Oriental morning post) -
(2006)
Qingchao huangdi de Zhongguo guan 清朝皇帝的的中国观 -
(2010)
关于新清史的几点看法 (various ideas about the new qing history)
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- © Emerald Publishing Limited
- ISSN
- 1871-2673
- DOI
- 10.1108/stics-04-2020-0013
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This paper aims to explore various tensions related to the diffusion and reception of the New Qing History (NQH) in China, and more specifically, it aims at underlying a recurrent tension within the core of this debate, between a Global and a Nationalist historical narrative.Design/methodology/approachThe author’s focus is to analyze various texts published in China between 2006 and 2018.FindingsThe author argues that the intensity of the current debate is partly related on the one hand, to the fact that NQH undermines various aspects of China’s Nationalist teleology and territorial claims and, on the other hand, to the basic difficulty of accepting the coexistence of various historical representations that are risking to weaken contemporary’s justifications of its rising schemes.Originality/valueThe text presents an original reading of some important issues raised by the NQH debate.
Journal
Social Transformations in Chinese Societies – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 10, 2020
Keywords: Historiography; Indigenization; New Qing history; Sinicization; World history