Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Ron, J. Rooda (2006)
OEE and equipment effectiveness: an evaluationInternational Journal of Production Research, 44
C. Herron, P. Braiden (2006)
A methodology for developing sustainable quantifiable productivity improvement in manufacturing companiesInternational Journal of Production Economics, 104
R. Sundkvist, P. Almström, A. Kinnander (2009)
Manufacturing system analysis methods review
Statistics Sweden
Industrial capacity utilisation
S. Saito
Reducing labor costs using industrial engineering techniques
Work Study
Productive motors
Ajay Rathore, R. Mohanty, Andrew Lyons (2003)
Managing total productivity: a practical application of measurement and optimisationInt. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., 5
B. Sahay (2005)
Multi‐factor productivity measurement model for service organisationInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54
K. Helmrich
Produktivitetsprocesser – metoder och erfarenheter kring att mäta och förbättra
Swerea
LeanNavigatorn – Ett dialogverktyg för utveckling av
B. Niebel, A. Freivalds (1998)
Methods, Standards and Work Design
P. Almström, A. Kinnander (2008)
Results and Conclusions from the Productivity Potential Assessment Studies
M. Hannula (2002)
Total productivity measurement based on partial productivity ratiosInternational Journal of Production Economics, 78
J.R. Hackman, G. Oldham
Work Redesign
S. Tangen (2005)
Demystifying productivity and performanceInternational Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54
C. Jutras
The Manufacturing Performance Management Benchmark Report
S. Nakajima (1988)
Introduction to TPM: total productive maintenance
Sweden. Produktivitetsdelegationen (1991)
Drivkrafter för produktivitet och välstånd : Produktivitetsdelegationens betänkande
R. Goodson (2002)
Read a plant-fastHarvard Business Review, 80
J. Brox, Christina Fader (2002)
The set of just-in-time management strategies: An assessment of their impact on plant-level productivity and input-factor substitutability using variable cost function estimatesInternational Journal of Production Research, 40
P. Almström, A. Kinnander
PPA‐metoden – En metod för att bedöma produktivitets‐potentialen i verkstadsindustrin
P. Almström, A. Kinnander (2007)
Productivity Potential Assessment of the Swedish Manufacturing Industry
Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development
Labour productivity growth
Purpose – The paper's aim is to focus on the productivity potential assessment (PPA) method which has been developed to measure and assess the productivity potentials at shop‐floor level in Swedish manufacturing industry. Design/methodology/approach – A study was carried out in one day by two certified analysts using a highly standardised work process. The focus is on a selected bottleneck area of a factory. Measurement from the selected area is combined with a broad data collection to make an assessment of the potential for increasing the productivity in the factory. The results were fed back to the factory management orally on the same day and in a written report. Findings – The paper shows that the PPA method was not designed to be a research method. It is a practical method that is based on a systems perspective where as many factors affecting the productivity and productivity development are gathered in one day. Research limitations/implications – A consecutive article will present the result from the studies. Practical implications – The method has been applied in over 70 cases and has had an impact on all these cases for the factories studied. Social implications – Productivity is of utmost importance for society. Productivity development has been neglected in many companies during recent decades. Originality/value – The PPA method is unique in its combination of scope, analysis methods, and public availability. There are similar methods but no others found that make this combination.
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 20, 2011
Keywords: Productivity measurement; Production improvement; Assessment; Work sampling; Manufacturing systems; Performance measurement; Sweden
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.