Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Kemp, R. Hare (1952)
The Language of Morals.The Philosophical Quarterly, 4
Francis Sparshott, R. Hare (1964)
Freedom and reason
R. Hancock (1974)
Twentieth century ethics
I. Lakatos (1976)
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
T.W. Hutchinson
Positive Economics
Maximilian Weber (1989)
Wissenschaft als BerufDeutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 37
Lawrence Ritter, A. Leijonhufvud (1970)
On Keynesian Economics And The Economics Of Keynes
A. Bergson (1966)
Essays in normative economics
T. Kuhn (1964)
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.The Philosophical Quarterly, 14
G. Myrdal (1973)
Against the Stream: Critical Essays on Economics
M. Bulmer (2021)
Social Science and Social Policy
T. Parsons, Alexander Schelting (1936)
Max Webers Wissenschaftslehre.American Sociological Review, 1
B. Ward (1972)
What's Wrong with Economics?
Franz Boese (1939)
Geschichte des Vereins für Sozialpolitik 1872-1932
W. Eucken (1942)
Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie, 44
G. Myrdal (1954)
The Political Element in the Development of Economic Theory
G. Debreu (1960)
Theory of value : an axiomatic analysis of economic equilibriumSouthern Economic Journal, 27
Anton Dumitriu (1980)
History of logic
J. Searle (1964)
How to derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’The Philosophical Review, 73
W.H. Werkmeister
Social science and the problem of value
K. Arrow (1951)
Social Choice and Individual Values
E. Baudier, G. Debreu (1959)
Theory of Value
The economic science is again in a crisis and a new solution prolegomena to any future study in economics, finance and other social sciences has just been published by the International Institute of Social Economics in care of the MCB University Press in England. The roots of the major financial and economic problems of our time lie in an open conflict between theory and practice. In the 1930s and before the conflict was between classical theory and given realities. In the 1990s the conflict appears between the now prevailing modern, Keynesian theory and the actual realities. In addition during the twentieth century a great argument developed between the two schools of thought, argument which is not yet settled. In one sentence, the prolegomena tried and was successful to solve the conflict between theory and practice and the big doctrinal dispute of the twentieth century. It was a struggle of research and observation over half a century between 1947 and 1997.
International Journal of Social Economics – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 1998
Keywords: Economics; Macroeconomics
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.