Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
David Gosling, Vaneeta‐marie D'Andrea (2001)
Quality Development: A new concept for higher educationQuality in Higher Education, 7
Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18
Lee Harvey (2009)
Beyond TQM
Sapna Popli (2005)
Ensuring customer delight: a quality approach to excellence in management educationQuality in Higher Education, 11
Ann Taket (1994)
Beyond TQMJournal of the Operational Research Society, 45
Y. Brunetto, R. Farr‐wharton (2005)
Academics’ Responses to the Implementation of a Quality AgendaQuality in Higher Education, 11
Vaneeta‐marie D'Andrea, David Gosling (2005)
Improving Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Whole Institution Approach
Dennis Law (2010)
Quality assurance in post‐secondary educationQuality Assurance in Education, 18
A. Strydom, J. Strydom (2004)
Establishing quality assurance in the South African contextQuality in Higher Education, 10
José Soria-García, A. Martinez-Lorente (2014)
Development and validation of a measure of the quality management practices in educationTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25
W. Massy (2003)
Honoring the Trust: Quality and Cost Containment in Higher Education
Jan Kleijnen, D. Dolmans, J. Willems, H. hout (2014)
Effective quality management requires a systematic approach and a flexible organisational culture: a qualitative study among academic staffQuality in Higher Education, 20
R. Birnbaum (2000)
Management fads in higher education : where they come from, what they do, why they fail
Robert Birnbaum, J. Deshotels (1999)
Has the Academy Adopted TQMPlanning for higher education, 28
C. Bilen (2010)
Total quality management in higher education institutions: challenges and future directionsInternational Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 5
S. Cardoso, M. Rosa, B. Stensaker (2016)
Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academicsAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41
Viraigyan Teeroovengadum, T. Kamalanabhan, A. Seebaluck (2016)
Measuring service quality in higher education: Development of a hierarchical model (HESQUAL)Quality Assurance in Education, 24
N. Zulu, L. Murray, J. Strydom (2004)
Quality, culture and changeQuality in Higher Education, 10
B. Stensaker (2008)
Outcomes of Quality Assurance: A Discussion of Knowledge, Methodology and ValidityQuality in Higher Education, 14
G. Srikanthan, J. Dalrymple (2002)
Developing a Holistic Model for Quality in Higher EducationQuality in Higher Education, 8
M. Brookes, N. Becket (2007)
Quality management in higher education: a review of international issues and practice
(2007)
Quality as Fashion
Ǻ. Gornitzka, P. Maassen, H. Boer (2017)
Change in university governance structures in continental EuropeHigher Education Quarterly, 71
Halina Pratasavitskaya, B. Stensaker (2010)
Quality Management in Higher Education: Towards a Better Understanding of an Emerging FieldQuality in Higher Education, 16
P. Knight (2006)
Quality Enhancement and Educational Professional DevelopmentQuality in Higher Education, 12
B. Stensaker, Liv Langfeldt, L. Harvey, J. Huisman, D. Westerheijden (2011)
An in‐depth study on the impact of external quality assuranceAssessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36
Ǻ. Gornitzka (2007)
What is the Use of Bologna in National Reform
Faisal Talib, Z. Rahman, M. Qureshi (2011)
Analysis of interaction among the barriers to total quality management implementation using interpretive structural modeling approachBenchmarking: An International Journal, 18
M. Manatos, C. Sarrico, M. Rosa (2017)
The integration of quality management in higher education institutions: a systematic literature reviewTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28
Bruce Macfarlane, R. Ottewill (2004)
Quality and the scholarship of teaching: learning from subject reviewQuality in Higher Education, 10
L. Harvey (1998)
An Assessment of past and Current Approaches to Quality in Higher EducationAustralian Journal of Education, 42
John Hughes (1997)
Transforming Higher EducationJournal of Vocational Education & Training, 49
G. Srikanthan, J. Dalrymple (2005)
Implementation of a holistic model for quality in higher educationQuality in Higher Education, 11
M. Cruickshank (2003)
Total Quality Management in the higher education sector: A literature review from an international and Australian perspectiveTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14
T. Csizmadia, J. Enders, D. Westerheijden (2008)
Quality management in Hungarian higher education: organisational responses to governmental policyHigher Education, 56
C. Sarrico (2010)
On Performance in Higher Education: Towards performance governanceTertiary Education and Management, 16
M. Rosa, D. Tavares, A. Amaral (2006)
Institutional Consequences of Quality AssessmentQuality in Higher Education, 12
Manuel Tavarez, Fen Wang, J. Gómez, Mahesh Rainsinghani, V. Savkova, T. Shevchenko (2017)
Decision-Making Support Systems in Quality Management of Higher Education Institutions: A Selective ReviewInt. J. Decis. Support Syst. Technol., 9
K. Watty (2006)
Want to Know About Quality in Higher Education? Ask an AcademicQuality in Higher Education, 12
D. Seymour (1991)
TQM on Campus: What the Pioneers Are Finding., 44
P. Kurasha, R. Chabaya, Paul Mupa (2011)
Managing Quality in Higher Education
M. Barrow (1999)
Quality‐management Systems and Dramaturgical ComplianceQuality in Higher Education, 5
PurposeIn recent decades, higher education institutions have been encouraged to develop their own internal management systems as a response to perceived quality challenges in the sector. These quality management (QM) systems have often been found to mainly reflect external accountability requirements, with less focus on coherent study programme development. The purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between QM practices and study programme delivery in Norwegian higher education institutions.Design/methodology/approachThe study examined how coordination and control of quality work with respect to educational activities take place, using data from a survey to study programme leaders in a large sample of Norwegian higher education institutions.FindingsThe main findings show that a majority of institutions have established formal advisory bodies with a QM mandate, contributing to more coherent thinking, even though the division of labour between these bodies and formal decision-making structures often is unclear. The study also shows a high level of diversity in the collaboration practices among different actors involved in QM work, indicating that QM practices are adapted to local needs.Originality/valueThe paper provides new knowledge as to how QM is conducted in practice at the local level. It nuances earlier studies by showing the involvement of collegial bodies in QM although such bodies may have unclear mandates and, thus, an unclear role in the QM process.
International Journal of Educational Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 7, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.