Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The paradoxical repertoires of management consultancy

The paradoxical repertoires of management consultancy Purpose – To outline paradoxes found in literature on management consulting and present a novel way of re‐conceptualizing paradox using a performative or action‐oriented approach to discourse. Design/methodology/approach – The approach is based on a theoretical reinterpretation of existing research findings on management consulting. Limited ethnographic data are also used to support the argument. Findings – The paper argues that paradoxes are an outcome of the many, often conflicting, interpretive repertoires (IR) used to understand management consulting. This suggests that paradoxes may never be resolved but instead may constitute a key resource for agents in affecting change. This idea is illustrated with reference to ethnographic data from a study of management consultants. Research limitations/implications – The paper suggests that a performative theory of discourse enables researchers to appreciate how and why paradoxes are reproduced in the context of organizational change. Practical implications – Practitioners are seen to work within paradoxes, using conflicting IR as a toolkit for negotiating change. Originality/value – Proposes a novel way of viewing paradoxes by shifting the focus away from what paradoxical accounts reflect towards what they achieve in the context of interaction. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Organizational Change Management Emerald Publishing

The paradoxical repertoires of management consultancy

Journal of Organizational Change Management , Volume 19 (4): 13 – Jul 1, 2006

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-paradoxical-repertoires-of-management-consultancy-CzeBUuOtU6
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0953-4814
DOI
10.1108/09534810610676635
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – To outline paradoxes found in literature on management consulting and present a novel way of re‐conceptualizing paradox using a performative or action‐oriented approach to discourse. Design/methodology/approach – The approach is based on a theoretical reinterpretation of existing research findings on management consulting. Limited ethnographic data are also used to support the argument. Findings – The paper argues that paradoxes are an outcome of the many, often conflicting, interpretive repertoires (IR) used to understand management consulting. This suggests that paradoxes may never be resolved but instead may constitute a key resource for agents in affecting change. This idea is illustrated with reference to ethnographic data from a study of management consultants. Research limitations/implications – The paper suggests that a performative theory of discourse enables researchers to appreciate how and why paradoxes are reproduced in the context of organizational change. Practical implications – Practitioners are seen to work within paradoxes, using conflicting IR as a toolkit for negotiating change. Originality/value – Proposes a novel way of viewing paradoxes by shifting the focus away from what paradoxical accounts reflect towards what they achieve in the context of interaction.

Journal

Journal of Organizational Change ManagementEmerald Publishing

Published: Jul 1, 2006

Keywords: Management consultancy; Organizational change

References