Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Heidi Julien, Lawrence Duggan (2000)
A Longitudinal Analysis of the Information Needs and Uses LiteratureLibrary & Information Science Research, 22
S. Jacquemont, A. Curie, V. Portes, M. Torrioli, E. Berry-Kravis, R. Hagerman, F. Ramos, K. Cornish, Yunsheng He, C. Paulding, G. Neri, Fei Chen, N. Hadjikhani, D. Martinet, Joanne Meyer, J. Beckmann, Karine Delange, Amandine Brun, G. Bussy, F. Gasparini, T. Hilse, A. Floesser, J. Branson, G. Bilbe, D. Johns, B. Gomez-Mancilla (2011)
Epigenetic Modification of the FMR1 Gene in Fragile X Syndrome Is Associated with Differential Response to the mGluR5 Antagonist AFQ056Science Translational Medicine, 3
Donald Case (2006)
Information behaviorAnnu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol., 40
L. McKechnie, Jen Pecoskie, Christopher Dixon (2006)
The presentation of the user in reports of information behaviour researchInformation Research: An International Electronic Journal, 12
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59
P. Vinkler (2009)
The ź-indexJournal of Information Science, 35
Feifei Wang, Junping Qiu, Houqiang Yu (2012)
Research on the cross-citation relationship of core authors in scientometricsScientometrics, 91
S. Zyoud, Samah Al-Jabi, W. Sweileh (2014)
Worldwide research productivity in the field of electronic cigarette: a bibliometric analysisBMC Public Health, 14
Gabriel Kreiman, J. Maunsell (2011)
Nine Criteria for a Measure of Scientific OutputFrontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 5
Yu-Wei Chang (2011)
資訊需求及資訊尋求 研究文獻特性之比較: 書目計量及社會網絡分析 A Comparative Study of the Research Literature on Information Needs and Information Seeking: A bibliometric and social network analysisJournal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 48
A. González-Teruel, G. González-Alcaide, Maite Barrios, M. Abad-García (2015)
Mapping recent information behavior research: an analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networksScientometrics, 103
L. Amaral, A. Motter, M. Stringer (2009)
A complex systems approach to bibliometrics
Faramarz Soheili, A. Khasseh (2015)
HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF INFORMATION BEHAVIOR RESEARCH BY REFERENCE PUBLICATION YEAR SPECTROSCOPYIranian Journal of Information Processing & Management, 31
Heidi Julien, Jen Pecoskie, K. Reed (2011)
Trends in information behavior research, 1999–2008: A content analysisLibrary & Information Science Research, 33
D. Truex, Michael Cuellar, H. Takeda (2009)
Assessing Scholarly Influence: Using the Hirsch Indices to Reframe the DiscourseJ. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 10
Jiang Li, M. Sanderson, P. Willett, Michael Norris, C. Oppenheim (2010)
Ranking of library and information science researchers: Comparison of data sources for correlating citation data, and expert judgmentsJ. Informetrics, 4
H. Takeda, D. Truex, Michael Cuellar, R. Vidgen (2012)
Scholarly Influence Research (SIR): Augmenting Ideational Influence with Social InfluenceInt. J. Soc. Organ. Dyn. IT, 2
Information Research, 13
Li-Ping Ku (2010)
Introduction to information seeking behavior—A review of literature and field practice directionsJournal of Data and Information Science, 3
L. McKechnie, George Goodall, Darian Lajoie-Paquette, Heidi Julien (2005)
How human information behaviour researchers use each other's work: a basic citation analysis studyInf. Res., 10
L. Freeman (1977)
A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness
W. Glänzel, A. Schubert (2004)
Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistryScientometrics, 50
Christian Tetzlaff, Christoph Kolodziejski, M. Timme, F. Wörgötter (2011)
Synaptic Scaling in Combination with Many Generic Plasticity Mechanisms Stabilizes Circuit ConnectivityFrontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 5
Thomas Wilson (1999)
Models in information behaviour researchJ. Documentation, 55
Anne Rumsey (2006)
The Association Between Co-authorship Network Structures and Successful Academic Publishing Among Higher Education Scholars
P. Vinkler (2017)
Core indicators and professional recognition of scientometriciansJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68
L. McKechnie, K. Pettigrew, S. Joyce (2001)
The origins and contextual use of theory in human information behaviour researchNew Review of Information Behaviour Research, 2
Nicole Mitchell (2008)
Library 2.0: A guide to participatory library serviceJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59
J. Hirsch (2005)
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 46
P. Vinkler (2010)
The πv-index: a new indicator to characterize the impact of journalsScientometrics, 82
T. Wilson (2013)
Review of: Wilson, T. D. (Ed.). Theory in information behaviour research. Sheffield, UK: Eiconics Ltd.Information Research, 18
Heidi Julien, S. Genuis, L. McKechnie, T. Oliphant (2008)
Communicating research findings to library and information science practitioners: A study of ISIC papers from 1996 to 2006.
J. Mingers, Frederico Macri, Dan Petrovici (2012)
Using the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and managementInf. Process. Manag., 48
A. Abrizah, Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh, Vala Rohani, M. Thelwall, Jonathan Levitt, F. Didegah (2014)
Sixty-four years of informetrics research: productivity, impact and collaborationScientometrics, 101
Hamid Jamali (2013)
Citation relations of theories of human information behaviourWebology, 10
Michael Cuellar, H. Takeda, R. Vidgen, D. Truex (2016)
Ideational Influence, Connectedness, and Venue Representation: Making an Assessment of Scholarly CapitalJ. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 17
W. Walters, E. Wilder (2015)
Worldwide contributors to the literature of library and information science: top authors, 2007–2012Scientometrics, 103
Antonis Sidiropoulos, Dimitrios Katsaros, Y. Manolopoulos (2007)
Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networksScientometrics, 72
J. Sahel (2011)
Quality Versus Quantity: Assessing Individual Research PerformanceScience Translational Medicine, 3
K. Pettigrew, L. McKechnie (2001)
The Use of Theory in Information Science Research.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52
D. Rosenstreich, Ben Wooliscroft (2009)
Measuring the impact of accounting journals using Google Scholar and the g-indexBritish Accounting Review, 41
Information Research, 12
L. Freeman (1978)
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarificationSocial Networks, 1
Michael Cuellar, H. Takeda, R. Vidgen, D. Truex (2016)
Rejoinder to the Response to "The Scholarly Capital Model"J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 17
L. Egghe (2006)
Theory and practise of the g-indexScientometrics, 69
Heidi Julien (1996)
A Content Analysis of the Recent Information Needs and Uses LiteratureLibrary & Information Science Research, 18
Cassidy Sugimoto, Daifeng Li, Terrell Russell, S. Finlay, Ying Ding (2011)
The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocationJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 62
D. Truex, Michael Cuellar, H. Takeda, R. Vidgen (2011)
The scholarly influence of Heinz Klein: ideational and social measures of his impact on IS research and IS scholarsEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 20
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify the top researchers in information behaviour (IB) based on ideational and social influence indicators.Design/methodology/approachThe population included papers on IB indexed in the Web of Science from 1980 to 2015. UCINET and Bibexcel were the tools used for measuring the ideational and social influence indicators. The correlations among the study variables were measured by applying SPSS and LISREL.FindingsThere was a significant relationship between IB researchers’ productivity and performance, and between ideational influence and social influence. The structural equation modelling showed that a researcher with top placement in his/her co-authorship network can gain higher ideational influence. In total, it seems that the single and traditional criteria are increasingly replacing new and integrative ones in measuring researchers’ scientific influence in fields including IB studies. Results have shown that based on total scores of the studied indicators, Spink, A., Nicholas, D., Ford, N., Huntington, P., Wilson, T.D., and Jamali, H.R. gained the high scores.Originality/valueThe current study used an integrative method based on influence indicators to identify the influential researchers in IB studies. None of the few studies done using bibliometric methods in the realm of IB has investigated the ideational and social influence indicators altogether.
Aslib Journal of Information Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 20, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.