Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The moral arc of the library: what are our duties and limitations after 45?

The moral arc of the library: what are our duties and limitations after 45? PurposeThis study aims to explore the question of whether or not librarians can ethically remain politically neutral in the wake of the 45th administration. The authors take a critical look at the American Library Association’s Code of Ethics, as well as the concept of vocational awe, and recommend challenging the “sacredness” of neutrality as a core tenet of the profession. Additionally, the authors describe the history of white privilege within libraries and argue that it is time to actively fight white supremacy and disavow the profession’s history of replicating racist social structures.Design/methodology/approachThis study is a researched think piece designed to encourage critical thought about long-held idealistic beliefs in the profession.FindingsThis study suggests that despite the profession’s history of outwardly valuing “neutrality,” libraries are not and have never been neutral. Libraries have chosen, time and again, to value white privilege and a white frame of reference to the detriment of librarians and patrons of color. Because many librarians also see the profession as upholding “sacred” ideals like neutrality, we fall into the trap of being unable to criticize our own profession and practices and, therefore, are unable to make much needed changes.Research limitations/implicationsThis study is based on the opinions of the authors and on the opinions of authors they have cited. It contains no original quantitative or qualitative research.Originality/valueThis study challenges the long-held assumptions that the profession has taken for granted over the past century. The authors argue that it is good and necessary to question the Code of Ethics, vocational awe and neutrality with the goal of improving the profession in light of the current cultural and political climate. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Reference Services Review Emerald Publishing

The moral arc of the library: what are our duties and limitations after 45?

Cheshire, Kelsey; Stout, Jennifer
Reference Services Review , Volume 48 (2): 7 – Apr 11, 2020
Download PDF
7 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-moral-arc-of-the-library-what-are-our-duties-and-limitations-after-t5q0QvehkT

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0090-7324
DOI
10.1108/RSR-10-2019-0074
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to explore the question of whether or not librarians can ethically remain politically neutral in the wake of the 45th administration. The authors take a critical look at the American Library Association’s Code of Ethics, as well as the concept of vocational awe, and recommend challenging the “sacredness” of neutrality as a core tenet of the profession. Additionally, the authors describe the history of white privilege within libraries and argue that it is time to actively fight white supremacy and disavow the profession’s history of replicating racist social structures.Design/methodology/approachThis study is a researched think piece designed to encourage critical thought about long-held idealistic beliefs in the profession.FindingsThis study suggests that despite the profession’s history of outwardly valuing “neutrality,” libraries are not and have never been neutral. Libraries have chosen, time and again, to value white privilege and a white frame of reference to the detriment of librarians and patrons of color. Because many librarians also see the profession as upholding “sacred” ideals like neutrality, we fall into the trap of being unable to criticize our own profession and practices and, therefore, are unable to make much needed changes.Research limitations/implicationsThis study is based on the opinions of the authors and on the opinions of authors they have cited. It contains no original quantitative or qualitative research.Originality/valueThis study challenges the long-held assumptions that the profession has taken for granted over the past century. The authors argue that it is good and necessary to question the Code of Ethics, vocational awe and neutrality with the goal of improving the profession in light of the current cultural and political climate.

Journal

Reference Services Review – Emerald Publishing

Published: Apr 11, 2020

References

  • The library in the lives of Latino college students