Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Lawrence (2001)
Free online availability substantially increases a paper's impactNature, 411
He is member of the electronic publishing group of the Saarland University and State Library
G. Eysenbach
Citation advantage of open access articles
Chawki Hajjem, S. Harnad, Y. Gingras (2005)
Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation ImpactIEEE Data Eng. Bull., 28
T. Brody, S. Harnad (2005)
Earlier Web Usage Statistics as Predictors of Later Citation ImpactArXiv, abs/cs/0503020
He is deputy director and member of the electronic publishing group of the Saarland University and State Library
(2004)
521-522 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v411/n6837/full/411521a0 A guide to institutional repository software
T. Brody, S. Harnad
Comparing the impact of Open Access (OA) vs Non‐OA articles in the same journals
(2005)
Publikationsstrategien im Wandel? : Ergebnisse einer Umfrage zum Publikations-und Rezeptionsverhalten DFG-geförderter Wissenschaftler unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Open Access
M. Pahor, Miha Škerlavaj, Vlado Dimovski (2008)
Evidence for the network perspective on organizational learningJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59
Deutsche Forschungs‐Gemeinschaft (DFG)
Publikationsstrategien im Wandel?: Ergebnisse einer Umfrage zum Publikations‐ und Rezeptionsverhalten DFG‐geförderter Wissenschaftler unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Open Access / Ed. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
Open Society Institute
A Guide to Institutional Repository Software
Purpose – The purpose of this article is to describe the open access archiving of scientific primary and secondary literature on the institutional and the disciplinary repository of the Saarland University and State Library. The challenges, opportunities and success factors of both repositories are compared and evaluated. Design/methodology/approach – The article is based on the findings and experiences of eight years of open access archiving practice. Findings – Basic requirements for success and acceptance are: quality control and standardisation that could be proved for example by an official certificate; and visibility and dissemination – researchers emphasize that their documents are indexed by the databases most common within their community. This applies especially to disciplinary repositories. Originality/value – Universities should undoubtedly offer an institutional repository. Usually the university library runs this repository. The article lists some key points that should be considered when an organisation plans to start and run an institutional or disciplinary repository.
OCLC Systems and Services: International digital library perspectives – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 15, 2008
Keywords: Archiving; Literature; Generation and dissemination of information
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.