Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Aitchison (2009)
Writing groups for doctoral educationStudies in Higher Education, 34
A. Sfard (1998)
On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just OneEducational Researcher, 27
B. Panto
WikiVet, a learner's experience
R. Adams (2006)
Linguistics in your inbox: a review of listservs for second language researchSecond Language Research, 22
A. Masson (2009)
VRE library services: Learning from supporting VLE usersLibr. Hi Tech, 27
Margaret Kiley, G. Wisker (2009)
Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossingHigher Education Research & Development, 28
J. Lave, E. Wenger (1991)
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
S. Siegel, W. Kaemmerer (1978)
Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 63
Claire Baldwin, G. Chandler (2002)
Improving faculty publication output: the role of a writing coach.Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 18 1
R. Murray, M. Newton (2009)
Writing retreat as structured intervention: margin or mainstream?Higher Education Research & Development, 28
L. Currie, M. Eodice
Roots entwined: growing a sustainable collaboration
Fiona Graham, Dorothy Kessler (2020)
Threshold conceptsOccupational Performance Coaching
N. Panteli, S. Sockalingam (2005)
Trust and conflict within virtual inter-organizational alliances: a framework for facilitating knowledge sharingDecis. Support Syst., 39
James Inman, D. Sewell (2000)
Taking Flight With OWLs: Examining Electronic Writing Center Work
J. Cameron, K. Nairn, J. Higgins (2009)
Demystifying Academic Writing: Reflections on Emotions, Know-How and Academic IdentityJournal of Geography in Higher Education, 33
J.I. Friend, J.C. González
Get together to write: in supporting one another's scholarship, these new faculty learned about more than writing and publishing
M. Mahaffy (2008)
Exploring common ground: US Writing Center/Library CollaborationNew Library World, 109
Pat Gannon-Leary, Elsa Fontainha (2008)
COMMUNITIES OF LEARNING: EXTENDING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LEARNING EXPERIENCE THROUGH CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL COLLABORATION
Judith Wusteman
Virtual research environments: Issues and opportunities for librarians
E. Wenger, W. Snyder (2002)
Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge
D. Delyser (2003)
Teaching Graduate Students to Write: A seminar for thesis and dissertation writersJournal of Geography in Higher Education, 27
Jo Webb, Pat Gannon-Leary, Moira Bent (2007)
Providing Effective Library Services for Research
Denise Cuthbert, C. Spark (2008)
Getting a GRiP: examining the outcomes of a pilot program to support graduate research students in writing for publicationStudies in Higher Education, 33
M. McGrail, C. Rickard, Rebecca Jones (2006)
Publish or perish: a systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication ratesHigher Education Research & Development, 25
C. Tysick, N. Babb
Writing support for junior faculty librarians: a case study
Pat Gannon-Leary, Elsa Fontainha (2007)
Communities of Practice and Virtual Learning Communities: Benefits, Barriers and Success Factors
Meredith Farkas (2007)
Social Software in Libraries: Building Collaboration, Communication, and Community Online
James Elmborg, Sheril Hook (2005)
Centers for Learning: Writing Centers and Libraries in Collaboration
D. Sonnenwald, Monica Lassi, Nasrine Olson, Marisa Ponti, Ann-Sofie Axelsson (2009)
Exploring new ways of working using virtual research environments in library and information scienceLibr. Hi Tech, 27
S. Grzybowski, J. Bates, B. Calam, J. Alred, R. Martin, R. Andrew, L. Rieb, S. Harris, Charles Wiebe, E. Knell, Sâmara Berger (2003)
A physician peer support writing group.Family medicine, 35 3
E. Wenger (1998)
Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity
C. Mullen (2009)
Editor’s overview: mentoring relations and collaborations within new practices of professional learningMentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17
N. Irvine, P. Carmichel
Threshold concepts: a point of focus for practitioner research
Kelly Blessinger, S. Braunstein, Alice Daugherty, Paul Hrycaj (2010)
Formation of an Academic Writing Group at Louisiana State University Libraries: Background, Guidelines and Lessons LearnedCodex: the Journal of the Louisiana Chapter of the ACRL, 1
N. Linh (2008)
A survey of the application of Web 2.0 in Australasian university librariesLibr. Hi Tech, 26
M. Myhill, M. Shoebridge, L. Snook (2009)
Virtual research environments - a Web 2.0 cookbook?Libr. Hi Tech, 27
Pat Gannon-Leary, Moira Bent (2010)
Writing for Publication and the Role of the Library: “Do Have a Cow, Man!” (“Don't Have a Cow, Man”-Bart Simpson)New Review of Academic Librarianship, 16
H. Fitzgerald (2007)
Review of: Farkas, Meredith G. Social software in libraries: building collaboration, communication, and community online. Medford, NJ: Information Today Inc., 2007Inf. Res., 12
J. Spector, Dirk Ifenthaler, P. Isaías, Kinshuk, D. Sampson (2014)
Learning and Instruction in the Digital Age
P. Creme, Colleen Mckenna (2010)
Developing writer identity through a multidisciplinary programmeArts and Humanities in Higher Education, 9
Rachel Parker (2009)
A learning community approach to doctoral education in the social sciencesTeaching in Higher Education, 14
N. Harinarayana, N. Raju (2010)
Web 2.0 features in university library web sitesElectron. Libr., 28
D. Perkins (1999)
The Many Faces of Constructivism.Educational Leadership, 57
J. Land (2006)
Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: an introduction
P. Gannon‐Leary, M. Bent
Writing for publication and the role of the library: “Do have a cow, man!’
Denise Cuthbert, C. Spark, Eliza Burke (2009)
Disciplining writing: the case for multi‐disciplinary writing groups to support writing for publication by higher degree by research candidates in the humanities, arts and social sciencesHigher Education Research & Development, 28
L. Driscoll, Kelly Parkes, Gresilda Tilley-Lubbs, Jennifer Brill, Vanessa Bannister (2009)
Navigating the lonely sea: peer mentoring and collaboration among aspiring women scholarsMentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 17
T. Stone, T. Levett-Jones, M. Harris, P. Sinclair (2010)
The genesis of 'the Neophytes': a writing support group for clinical nurses.Nurse education today, 30 7
Linda Galligan, P. Cretchley, L. George, K. Martin-McDonald, Jacquie McDonald, J. Rankin (2003)
Evolution and emerging trends of university writing groups, 19
C. Mcveigh, K. Moyle, K. Forrester, W. Chaboyer, E. Patterson, John St (2002)
Publication syndicates: in support of nursing scholarship.Journal of continuing education in nursing, 33 2
M. Hsu, Teresa Ju, Chiahui Yen, Chun-Ming Chang (2007)
Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectationsInt. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 65
S. Moore (2003)
Writers' retreats for academics: exploring and increasing the motivation to writeJournal of Further and Higher Education, 27
Cynthia Tysick, Nancy Babb (2006)
Perspectives on … Writing Support for Junior Faculty Librarians: A Case StudyThe Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32
K. Morss, R. Murray (2001)
Researching Academic Writing within a Structured Programme: Insights and outcomesStudies in Higher Education, 26
J. Wusteman
Editorial – virtual research environments: issues and opportunities for librarians
Purpose – Prior research has highlighted the isolation felt by some researchers engaged in academic writing. This article aims to examine whether such isolation might be partially overcome by membership of an online community of writers (CoW), hosted by higher education (HE) library services. Design/methodology/approach – A review of the literature was followed by an innovative piece of action research based around the authors' own long distance collaborative writing task in order to explore the issues at first‐hand. Case studies of existing online writing communities known to the authors but not currently hosted by libraries were also undertaken. Findings – Themes emerging include the importance of finding a medium for a CoW that is familiar and comfortable. Motivators to join a CoW include demands that academics be research active. Demotivators may include lack of trust and reluctance to share. Research limitations/implications – There are still questions to be answered and decisions to be taken about the initiation of a CoW. Further research is needed into topics such as mentoring roles and trust‐building but this work should provide a springboard. Practical implications – HE libraries might consider a CoW as a research support mechanism. Originality/value – The concept of a CoW is a novel one, as is the idea that such a collaboration might be hosted by HE libraries that might consider a CoW as an innovative addition to their existing portfolio of research support services.
Library Hi Tech – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 6, 2011
Keywords: Communities; Communication technologies; Libraries; Virtual organizations; Higher education; Networks
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.