Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Library World Volume 28 Issue 6

The Library World Volume 28 Issue 6 EVERY time we have occasion to compare the work of different libraries or to obtain exact information about certain of their activities we wish once more that some standardised form and method could be generally adopted for statistics. We would like to see the Library Association take up this matter, which is at least as necessary as the Standardisation of Accounts. The L.A. Outline for Annual Statements is very useful, but it does not go far enough. Not only should it be decided what information should be presented it should be laid down exactly what should be included under the different headings. The most necessary definition is what shall be embraced and excluded under the heading fiction. Some librarians, rightly or wrongly personally we think wrongly, because it leads to confusion and ambiguity classify as literature, or according to subject matter and count as non fiction a varying proportion of the novels issued. Consequently, they are able to boast of a large nonfiction percentage. Probably the practice has the reverse effect to that intended, since once it is realised that any novels are included in the nonfiction percentage doubt arises as to the amount of real nonfiction issued. The librarian who openly asserted that his nonfiction percentage was so and so, but that it did not include a single work of prose fiction, would surely be in a stronger position. A more serious objection, however, is that comparison is impossible, and misleading. The librarian who keeps strictly to the old practice of calling a spade a spade is placed in a very unpleasant position if he is asked why another town, where he knows the nonfiction issues to be on a par with his own, records a much higher nonfiction percentage. Few reports, again, show what part of the juvenile issues are of nonfiction. In fact, in every part of our statistical work we all follow our own methods and so make comparative studies impossible. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png New Library World Emerald Publishing

The Library World Volume 28 Issue 6

New Library World , Volume 28 (6): 17 – Nov 1, 1925

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-library-world-volume-28-issue-6-w2UK04PyIi
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
0307-4803
DOI
10.1108/eb009099
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

EVERY time we have occasion to compare the work of different libraries or to obtain exact information about certain of their activities we wish once more that some standardised form and method could be generally adopted for statistics. We would like to see the Library Association take up this matter, which is at least as necessary as the Standardisation of Accounts. The L.A. Outline for Annual Statements is very useful, but it does not go far enough. Not only should it be decided what information should be presented it should be laid down exactly what should be included under the different headings. The most necessary definition is what shall be embraced and excluded under the heading fiction. Some librarians, rightly or wrongly personally we think wrongly, because it leads to confusion and ambiguity classify as literature, or according to subject matter and count as non fiction a varying proportion of the novels issued. Consequently, they are able to boast of a large nonfiction percentage. Probably the practice has the reverse effect to that intended, since once it is realised that any novels are included in the nonfiction percentage doubt arises as to the amount of real nonfiction issued. The librarian who openly asserted that his nonfiction percentage was so and so, but that it did not include a single work of prose fiction, would surely be in a stronger position. A more serious objection, however, is that comparison is impossible, and misleading. The librarian who keeps strictly to the old practice of calling a spade a spade is placed in a very unpleasant position if he is asked why another town, where he knows the nonfiction issues to be on a par with his own, records a much higher nonfiction percentage. Few reports, again, show what part of the juvenile issues are of nonfiction. In fact, in every part of our statistical work we all follow our own methods and so make comparative studies impossible.

Journal

New Library WorldEmerald Publishing

Published: Nov 1, 1925

There are no references for this article.