Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sunita Sah, D. Moore, R. MacCoun (2013)
Cheap talk and credibility: The consequences of confidence and accuracy on advisor credibility and persuasivenessOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121
Mark Zimbelman, W. Waller (1999)
An Experimental Investigation of Auditor-Auditee Interaction under AmbiguityJournal of Accounting Research, 37
Joseph Brazel, Christopher Agoglia, Richard Hatfield (2004)
Electronic versus Face‐to‐Face Review: The Effects of Alternative Forms of Review on Auditors' PerformanceThe Accounting Review, 79
J. Burgoon, Jerold Hale (1988)
Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviorsCommunication Monographs, 55
Kristopher Preacher, A. Hayes (2008)
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator modelsBehavior Research Methods, 40
Oliver Sheldon, Melissa Thomas-Hunt, Chad Proell (2006)
When timeliness matters: the effect of status on reactions to perceived time delay within distributed collaboration.The Journal of applied psychology, 91 6
P. Price, Eric Stone (2004)
Intuitive evaluation of likelihood judgment producers: evidence for a confidence heuristicJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 17
D. Hirst (1994)
Auditors Sensitivity To Source ReliabilityJournal of Accounting Research, 32
J. Walther, L. Tidwell (1995)
Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communicationJ. Organ. Comput., 5
R. Hurtt (2010)
Development of a Scale to Measure Professional SkepticismEar and Hearing, 29
Kris Byron, David Baldridge (2007)
E-Mail Recipients' Impressions of Senders' LikabilityJournal of Business Communication, 44
Jonathan Thomas, R. Mcfadyen (1995)
The confidence heuristic: A game-theoretic analysisJournal of Economic Psychology, 16
Y. Kalman, S. Rafaeli (2011)
Online Pauses and Silence: Chronemic Expectancy Violations in Written Computer-Mediated CommunicationCommunication Research, 38
R. Baron, D. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 6
R. Hurtt, Helen Brown-Liburd, Christine Earley, G. Krishnamoorthy (2013)
Research on Auditor Professional Skepticism: Literature Synthesis and Opportunities for Future ResearchAuditing-a Journal of Practice & Theory, 32
Y. Kalman, Lauren Scissors, Alastair Gill, D. Gergle (2013)
Online chronemics convey social informationComput. Hum. Behav., 29
C. Wesson, B. Pulford (2009)
Verbal Expressions of Confidence and DoubtPsychological Reports, 105
Kathryn Kadous (2000)
The Effects of Audit Quality and Consequence Severity on Juror Evaluations of Auditor Responsibility for Plaintiff LossesThe Accounting Review, 75
L. Swol (2009)
The Effects of Confidence and Advisor Motives on Advice UtilizationCommun. Res., 36
J. Sniezek, Lyn Swol (2001)
Trust, Confidence, and Expertise in a Judge-Advisor System.Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 84 2
J. Robertson (2010)
The effects of ingratiation and client incentive on auditor judgmentBehavioral Research in Accounting, 22
A. Hayes (2009)
Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New MillenniumCommunication Monographs, 76
(2000)
INSTRUCTION SKEPTICISM AND ACCOUNTING STUDENTS ABILITY TO DETECT FRAUDS IN AUDITING
U. Karmarkar, Zakary Tormala (2010)
Believe Me, I Have No Idea What I’m Talking About: The Effects of Source Certainty on Consumer Involvement and PersuasionJournal of Consumer Research, 36
Patricia Rockwell, D. Buller, J. Burgoon (1997)
The voice of deceit: Refining and expanding vocal cues to deceptionCommunication Research Reports, 14
Chih-Chen Lee, Robert Welker, Te-Wei Wang (2013)
An Experimental Investigation of Professional Skepticism in Audit InterviewsResearch Methods & Methodology in Accounting eJournal
Lyn Swol, J. Sniezek (2005)
Factors affecting the acceptance of expert advice.The British journal of social psychology, 44 Pt 3
Chih-Chen Lee, Robert Welker, M. Odom (2009)
Features of Computer‐Mediated, Text‐Based Messages that Support Automatable, Linguistics‐Based Indicators for Deception DetectionJ. Inf. Syst., 23
G. Bennett, Richard Hatfield (2013)
The Effect of the Social Mismatch between Staff Auditors and Client Management on the Collection of Audit EvidenceThe Accounting Review, 88
Y. Kalman, G. Ravid, D. Raban, S. Rafaeli (2006)
Pauses and Response Latencies: A Chronemic Analysis of Asynchronous CMCInformation Systems: Behavioral & Social Methods
Journal of Forensic and Investigative Accounting, 6
L. Quadackers, T. Groot, A. Wright (2014)
Auditors’ Professional Skepticism: Neutrality versus Presumptive Doubt†Contemporary Accounting Research, 31
Mark Peecher, I. Solomon (2001)
Theory and Experimentation in Studies of Audit Judgments and Decisions: Avoiding Common Research TrapsInternational Journal of Auditing, 5
R. Daft, R. Lengel (1986)
Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural designManagement Science, 32
Christopher Agoglia, Joseph Brazel, Richard Hatfield, Scott Jackson (2010)
How Do Audit Workpaper Reviewers Cope with the Conflicting Pressures of Detecting Misstatements and Balancing Client WorkloadsEar and Hearing, 29
S. Blount, Gregory Janicik (2001)
When Plans Change: Examining How People Evaluate Timing Changes in Work OrganizationsAcademy of Management Review, 26
S. Porter, L. Brinke (2010)
The truth about lies: What works in detecting high‐stakes deception?Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15
J. Walther (2002)
Time effects in computer-mediated groups: Past, present, and future.
PurposeWhile academic research has been conducted on auditors’ ability to exercise professional skepticism in face-to-face client interviews, little is known about auditors’ application of professional skepticism in email communication with the client. The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors that impact auditor professional skepticism during client inquiries conducted through email.Design/methodology/approachA 2 × 2 between-subjects experiment was conducted with 69 undergraduate and graduate auditing students as surrogates for auditors. The experimental design crossed two levels of client expressed confidence (high and low) and two levels of client response timing to the auditor’s email inquiry (earlier than expected and later than expected).FindingsResults indicate that management expressed confidence moderates the influence of management response timing on auditor professional skepticism and that auditor perceptions of client credibility mediate this interactive effect. When the client’s response is low in confidence, auditors perceive a later-than-expected response from the manager as less credible than an earlier-than-expected response, which leads to less reliance on management explanations, which signifies more skepticism. However, when confidence is high, response timing does not impact perceptions of the client’s credibility.Practical implicationsThe results imply that junior auditors should be vigilant of how communication cues in client emails may impact their judgments. Even though management response timing and expressed confidence should not influence auditor skepticism per se, auditors seem to vary their level of skepticism with the timing of the client’s response when client confidence is low but not when client confidence is high, despite the information content of the client’s response being held constant.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the literature on professional skepticism by addressing the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s concerns about the need for auditors to exercise more professional skepticism in practice, particularly in an environment in which computer-mediated communication is increasing at a fast pace; and assists practitioners in better understanding the factors that influence the degree of skepticism auditors exercise when collecting audit evidence through email. The study should be of interest to audit firms, as it provides evidence on whether auditors use nonverbal cues such as chronemics, or time-related messages, in email communication to judge management and evidence reliability and credibility.
Managerial Auditing Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 6, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.