Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The influence of work‐cells and facility layout on the manufacturing efficiency

The influence of work‐cells and facility layout on the manufacturing efficiency Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the use of a product‐oriented layout and a work‐cell strategy in order to maximise efficiency. These two categories of layout strategies are discussed separately, and are then used collectively in an analysis of the company. The aim is to understand how improvements on layout design could positively impact the future efficiency of the case study company. Design/methodology/approach – A model was developed and measured using 26 weeks of data between the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 during layout transformations at the case study company based in upstate New York. The model compared variables such as the distance traveled to retrieve parts, average daily output of engines, labour cost per unit produced, and the amount of time the engine remains in each cell; the aim of which is to increase the efficiency of the facility. Findings – The findings indicate that there is a strong correlation between the variables improved at both the cell‐structures and the product‐structures of the facility and the overall efficiency of the manufacturing facility itself. The results also show that an overall higher efficiency allows for the facility to handle much larger workloads and also drives down both short‐run and long‐run costs. The outcomes also allow for a suggestive redesign of the facility in order to further maximise efficiency. However, it was found that the amount of time a product remains in each cell on the assembly line does not have an effect on the overall output of diesel engines. Research limitations/implications – Various studies have been conducted focusing on the “facility layout problem,” yet thorough analyses of the redesigning of layout in regards to efficiency are not as available. Instead, an understanding of the topic was derived through sources focusing on the specificities of manufacturing layout. Originality/value – This paper describes layout efficiency through redesigns and layout using work‐cells in a product‐oriented environment. This study would be useful to manufacturers having low variability in their product and having the ability to use work‐cell layout within their facility. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Facilities Management Emerald Publishing

The influence of work‐cells and facility layout on the manufacturing efficiency

Download PDF
12 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-influence-of-work-cells-and-facility-layout-on-the-manufacturing-yzxjhFkaFk
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1472-5967
DOI
10.1108/14725961111148117
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyse the use of a product‐oriented layout and a work‐cell strategy in order to maximise efficiency. These two categories of layout strategies are discussed separately, and are then used collectively in an analysis of the company. The aim is to understand how improvements on layout design could positively impact the future efficiency of the case study company. Design/methodology/approach – A model was developed and measured using 26 weeks of data between the fourth quarter of 2009 and the first quarter of 2010 during layout transformations at the case study company based in upstate New York. The model compared variables such as the distance traveled to retrieve parts, average daily output of engines, labour cost per unit produced, and the amount of time the engine remains in each cell; the aim of which is to increase the efficiency of the facility. Findings – The findings indicate that there is a strong correlation between the variables improved at both the cell‐structures and the product‐structures of the facility and the overall efficiency of the manufacturing facility itself. The results also show that an overall higher efficiency allows for the facility to handle much larger workloads and also drives down both short‐run and long‐run costs. The outcomes also allow for a suggestive redesign of the facility in order to further maximise efficiency. However, it was found that the amount of time a product remains in each cell on the assembly line does not have an effect on the overall output of diesel engines. Research limitations/implications – Various studies have been conducted focusing on the “facility layout problem,” yet thorough analyses of the redesigning of layout in regards to efficiency are not as available. Instead, an understanding of the topic was derived through sources focusing on the specificities of manufacturing layout. Originality/value – This paper describes layout efficiency through redesigns and layout using work‐cells in a product‐oriented environment. This study would be useful to manufacturers having low variability in their product and having the ability to use work‐cell layout within their facility.

Journal

Journal of Facilities Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 12, 2011

Keywords: Manufacturing industries; Process analysis; Facility layout; Work‐cell planning; Product‐oriented layout; Efficiency; Assembly line balance; United States of America

References

  • Cost‐oriented assembly line balancing: model: formulations, solution difficulty, upper and lower bounds
    Amen, M.
  • Dynamic layout algorithms: a state of the art survey
    Balakrishnan, J.; Cheng, C.H.
  • A survey on problems and methods in generalized assembly line balancing
    Becker, C.; Scholl, A.
  • Assembly line balancing: which model to use when?
    Boysen, N.; Fliedner, M.; Scholl, A.
  • Evaluating the flexibility of facilities layouts using estimated relayout costs
    Bullington, S.F.; Webster, D.B.
  • Two‐stage approach for machine part grouping and cell layout problems
    Chan, F.; Chan, P.; Choy, K.; Lau, K.
  • Joint determination of machine cells and linear intercell layout
    Chiang, C.; Lee, S.
  • Facility layout problems: a survey
    Drira, A.; Pierreval, H.; Hajri‐Gabouj, S.
  • Flexibility in layouts: a simulation approach
    Gupta, R.M.
  • Operations Management
    Heizer, J.; Render, B.
  • Facilities Design
    Heragu, S.S.
  • The facility layout problem
    Kusiak, A.; Heragu, S.S.
  • The strategies of tabu search technique for facility layout optimization
    Liang, L.Y.; Chao, W.C.
  • The facility layout problem: recent and emerging trends and perspectives
    Meller, R.; Gau, K.Y.
  • Flexibility in manufacturing: a survey
    Sethi, A.K.; Sethi, S.P.
  • Facility Planning
    Tompkins, J.A.; White, J.A.; Bozer, Y.A.; Frazelle, E.H.; Tanchoco, J.M.A.; Treviño, J.
  • Computational performance and efficiency of lower bound procedures for the dynamic facility layout problem
    Urban, T.L.
  • A heuristic for the dynamic layout problem
    Urban, T.L.
  • Facility organization and layout design: an experimental comparison for job shops
    Venkatadri, U.; Rardin, R.L.; Montreuil, B.
  • Measuring flexibility of job shop layouts
    Webster, D.B.; Tyberghein, M.B.