Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50
L. Carsana, A. Jolibert (2017)
The effects of expertise and brand schematicity on the perceived importance of choice criteria: a Bordeaux wine investigationJournal of Product & Brand Management, 26
A. Rao, K. Monroe (1989)
The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers’ Perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative ReviewJournal of Marketing Research, 26
D. Aaker (1992)
Managing brand equity : capitalizing on the value of a brand name
Advances in Consumer Research, 12
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen (1977)
Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and ResearchContemporary Sociology, 6
G. Häubl, Valerie Trifts (2000)
Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision AidsMarketing Science, 19
A. Jolibert, Carlos Fernandez-Moreno (1983)
A Comparison of French and Mexican Gift Giving PracticesACR North American Advances
Advances in Consumer Research, 9
Kevin Keller (1997)
Strategic Brand Management: Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity
M. Vincent, W. Zikmund (1976)
An Experimental Investigation of Situational Effects on Risk PerceptionACR North American Advances
R. Belk (1982)
Effects of Gift-Giving Involvement on Gift Selection StrategiesACR North American Advances
V. Zeithaml (1988)
Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence:Journal of Marketing, 52
John Anderson (1983)
The Architecture of Cognition
G. Halkias (2015)
Mental representation of brands: a schema-based approach to consumers’ organization of market knowledgeJournal of Product & Brand Management, 24
K. Coney, R. Harmon (1979)
Dogmatism and Innovation: a Situational PerspectiveACR North American Advances
Sanjay Puligadda, William Ross, Rajdeep Grewal (2012)
Individual Differences in Brand SchematicityJournal of Marketing Research, 49
D. Hoult (2011)
The principle of reciprocity.Journal of magnetic resonance, 213 2
R. Belk, Kenneth Bahn, R. Mayer (1982)
Developmental Recognition of Consumption SymbolismJournal of Consumer Research, 9
S. Jaeger, P. Danaher, R. Brodie (2009)
Wine purchase decisions and consumption behaviours : Insights from a probability sample drawn in Auckland, New ZealandFood Quality and Preference, 20
Moonkyu Lee (1995)
Effects of Schema Congruity and Involvement on Product EvaluationsACR North American Advances
Advances in Consumer Research, 3
C. Dennis, A. Newman, Richard Michon, J. Brakus, L. Wright (2010)
The mediating effects of perception and emotion: Digital signage in mall atmospherics.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17
Sharon Banks (1979)
Gift-Giving: a Review and an Interactive ParadigmACR North American Advances
R. Vezina, Dorin Militaru (2004)
Collaborative filtering: theoretical positions and a research agenda in marketingInternational Journal of Technology Management, 28
S. Fiske, Steven Neuberg, A. Beattie, Sandra Milberg (1987)
Category-based and attribute-based reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23
A. Degeratu, A. Rangaswamy, Jianan Wu (2000)
Consumer Choice Behavior in Online and Traditional Supermarkets: The Effects of Brand Name, Price,
J. Sherry (1983)
Gift Giving in Anthropological PerspectiveJournal of Consumer Research, 10
R. Heeler, J. Francis, C. Okechuku, S. Reid (1979)
Gift Versus Personal Use Brand SelectionACR North American Advances
Advances in Consumer Research, 15
A. Omoto, E. Borgida (1988)
Guess who might be coming to dinner?: Personal involvement and racial stereotypingJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24
P. Warshaw (1980)
Buying a GiftPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6
K. Clarke, R. Belk (1978)
The Effects of Product Involvement and Task Definition on Anticipated Consumer EffortACR North American Advances
P. Gamble, É. Simon, Jean-Claude Taddei (2008)
Restructuring and Rebranding: The Need for Another Revolution in the LoireMarket Management, 8
Rong-An Shang, Yu-Chen Chen, Hsueh-Jung Liao (2006)
The value of participation in virtual consumer communities on brand loyaltyInternet Res., 16
A. Collins, E. Loftus (1975)
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processingPsychological Review, 82
E. Valenzi, I. Andrews (1971)
Effect of price information on product quality ratings.Journal of Applied Psychology, 55
Advances in Consumer Research, 10
S. Fiske, Mark Pavelchak (1986)
Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect.
Mark Pavelchak (1989)
Piecemeal and category-based evaluation: An idiographic analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56
D. Jennings, C. Wood (1994)
Wine: Achieving Competitive Advantage Through DesignInternational Journal of Wine Marketing, 6
Richard Celsi, J. Olson (1988)
The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension ProcessesJournal of Consumer Research, 15
A. Jover, F. Montes, Maria Fuentes (2004)
Measuring perceptions of quality in food products: the case of red wineFood Quality and Preference, 15
B. Lowes, John Turner, Gordan Wills (1968)
Patterns of gift giving and their marketing implicationsEuropean Journal of Marketing, 2
J. Zaichkowsky (1988)
Involvement and the Price CueACR North American Advances
E. Borgida, B. Howard-Pitney (1983)
Personal involvement and the robustness of perceptual salience effects.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45
Allan Collins, M. Quillian (1969)
Retrieval time from semantic memory
European Marketing Research Review, 7
J. Zaichkowsky (1994)
The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to AdvertisingJournal of Advertising, 23
J. Jacoby, J. Olson, Rafael Haddock (1971)
Price, brand name, and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality.Journal of Applied Psychology, 55
L. Komatsu (1992)
Recent views of conceptual structurePsychological Bulletin, 112
J. Bettman (1979)
An information processing theory of consumer choiceJournal of Marketing, 43
Advances in Consumer Research, 6
M. Sujan, J. Bettman (1989)
The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers’ Brand and Category Perceptions: Some Insights from Schema ResearchJournal of Marketing Research, 26
Advances in Consumer Research, 22
Heehyoung Jang, L. Olfman, Ilsang Ko, Joon Koh, K. Kim (2008)
The Influence of On-Line Brand Community Characteristics on Community Commitment and Brand LoyaltyInternational Journal of Electronic Commerce, 12
B. Howard-Pitney, E. Borgida, A. Omoto (1986)
Personal involvement: An examination of processing differences.Social Cognition, 4
Franck Celhay, Jean-François Trinquecoste (2008)
Pourquoi est-il difficile de “sortir” des codes graphiques du vin français ?Market Management, 8
Advances in Consumer Research, 6
Y. Yang, A. Paladino (2015)
The case of wine: understanding Chinese gift-giving behaviorMarketing Letters, 26
P. Nelson (1970)
Information and Consumer BehaviorJournal of Political Economy, 78
Advances in Consumer Research, 6
Stephanie Gillison, K. Reynolds (2016)
Shopping for yourself versus shopping for someone elseJournal of Consumer Marketing, 33
P. Ophuis, H. Trijp (1995)
Perceived quality: a market driven and consumer oriented approach.Food Quality and Preference, 6
Eli Cohen, F. D'hauteville, L. Sirieix (2009)
A cross-cultural comparison of choice criteria for wine in restaurantsInternational Journal of Wine Business Research, 21
Advances in Consumer Research, 6
R. Belk (1976)
It's the Thought That Counts: A Signed Digraph Analysis of Gift-GivingJournal of Consumer Research, 3
George Szybillo, J. Jacoby (1974)
Intrinsic versus extrinsic cues as determinants of perceived product quality.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59
PurposeThe purpose of this research is to investigate the influence of self-purchasing versus gift-giving situations on the importance of product cues and the moderating effect of brand schematicity.Design/methodology/approachData were collected via an online survey of 285 French consumers for wine and 139 French consumers for whisky. The interaction effect of the gift-giving situation and brand schematicity on the importance of product cues was then investigated.FindingsThe results differed, depending on the importance of brand cue. For the whisky category (high brand importance), brand schematicity had no influence on the importance of cues. For the wine category (low brand importance), brand schematicity moderated the influence of the gift-giving situation on the importance of extrinsic cues such as commercial brand. Brand schematicity and the situation of gift-giving also influence the number of important cues which consumers take into account when making their choice. In low-involvement purchasing situations, brand-aschematic consumers use fewer choice criteria than brand-schematic consumers, whereas in high-involvement purchasing situations, regardless of their level of brand schematicity, consumers use the same number of criteria to make their selection.Practical implicationsWhen the commercial brand is a salient cue and regardless of the purchasing situation, it is important to provide information on the brand to consumers through any format, such as social media, leaflets, flash codes, in-store digital display, etc. When the commercial brand is not a salient cue, brand schematicity may be relevant to a segment of consumers because this consumer profile may need more information and will focus on the commercial brand. Brand managers could develop a specific approach to schematic consumers based on brand content, for example, brand managers could provide marketing materials (e.g. leaflets, flash codes, mobile apps) to retail store managers explaining the origin and value of the commercial brand. Consumers could also be provided with digital devices (such as tablets), which they could use to search for information according to these cues before choosing their product. Social media and online brand community could also provide more details about the brand and may provide an interactive area for discussions with consumers.Originality/valueThere has been little research on the effect of brand schematicity on the importance of product cues. To the authors’ knowledge, the interaction between brand schematicity and purchase according to product category has not previously been studied. The influence of brand schematicity changes depending on the importance given to brand cues.
Journal of Consumer Marketing – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 8, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.