Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The impact of readability of corporate social responsibility information on credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers

The impact of readability of corporate social responsibility information on credibility as... This paper aims to study the impact of readability of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information on its credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers. It is hypothesized that the readability-credibility effect will be contingent on reader specialization.Design/methodology/approachTo test the hypothesis, a quasi-experiment with a 2 (readability) × 2 (reader specialization) design was conducted.FindingsOverall, the results lead to the conclusion that using plain language in CSR disclosures may be beneficial for their credibility as perceived by generalist readers thanks to their higher perceived truthfulness (one specific sub-dimension of credibility). Specialist readers’ perceived credibility, on the other hand, is not influenced by the enhanced readability resulting from plain language.Research limitations/implicationsStudent participants were used. The results may not be generalizable to practitioners with different levels of exposure to, familiarity with, and understanding of CSR disclosures.Practical implicationsGiven the lack of credibility of CSR disclosures, insight into perceived credibility antecedents is important. This study may be considered as a first step toward informing reporting standards regarding the inclusion of more detailed guidance on how corporations should formulate their CSR information to increase its perceived credibility.Originality/valueThe results suggest that enhanced readability may improve the potential of CSR reports as legitimacy tools for generalist readers. The direct examination of readers complements prior studies on CSR reporting quality and the language used in CSR disclosures. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal Emerald Publishing

The impact of readability of corporate social responsibility information on credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-impact-of-readability-of-corporate-social-responsibility-mJRxFfZUGJ

References (56)

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2040-8021
DOI
10.1108/sampj-03-2018-0056
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This paper aims to study the impact of readability of corporate social responsibility (CSR) information on its credibility as perceived by generalist versus specialist readers. It is hypothesized that the readability-credibility effect will be contingent on reader specialization.Design/methodology/approachTo test the hypothesis, a quasi-experiment with a 2 (readability) × 2 (reader specialization) design was conducted.FindingsOverall, the results lead to the conclusion that using plain language in CSR disclosures may be beneficial for their credibility as perceived by generalist readers thanks to their higher perceived truthfulness (one specific sub-dimension of credibility). Specialist readers’ perceived credibility, on the other hand, is not influenced by the enhanced readability resulting from plain language.Research limitations/implicationsStudent participants were used. The results may not be generalizable to practitioners with different levels of exposure to, familiarity with, and understanding of CSR disclosures.Practical implicationsGiven the lack of credibility of CSR disclosures, insight into perceived credibility antecedents is important. This study may be considered as a first step toward informing reporting standards regarding the inclusion of more detailed guidance on how corporations should formulate their CSR information to increase its perceived credibility.Originality/valueThe results suggest that enhanced readability may improve the potential of CSR reports as legitimacy tools for generalist readers. The direct examination of readers complements prior studies on CSR reporting quality and the language used in CSR disclosures.

Journal

Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy JournalEmerald Publishing

Published: Jul 9, 2019

Keywords: Credibility; CSR information; Generalist readers; Plain language; Specialist readers

There are no references for this article.