Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You and Your Team.

Learn More →

The Hawthorne legacy A reassessment of the impact of the Hawthorne studies on management scholarship, 1930‐1958

The Hawthorne legacy A reassessment of the impact of the Hawthorne studies on management... Purpose – This paper seeks to analyze the contribution that the Hawthorne studies made to the discipline of management. The recent scholarly trend has been to attack the Hawthorne studies on the grounds of methodology and originality. However, the only way to accurately view the Hawthorne studies is to recreate the intellectual environment in which the studies were conducted. Why did this version of human relations rather than Dennison's or Williams's emerge as the scholarly contribution? Design/methodology/approach – Both primary and secondary sources were utilized in the research. The focus was from the time period of 1930 to 1958. More contemporary work was considered as well. Findings – Contemporary scholars viewed Hawthorne as being more thorough and complete than previous work. They also viewed the study as a contribution in light of some methodological issues and political biases. Practical implications – Performing temporal analysis allows the perceived strengths and weaknesses of scholarly works to become more apparent. Originality/value – Previous accounts of the Hawthorne studies have mostly studied their impact on practitioners. This study examines the impact on scholars. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Management History Emerald Publishing

The Hawthorne legacy A reassessment of the impact of the Hawthorne studies on management scholarship, 1930‐1958

Journal of Management History , Volume 18 (1): 15 – Jan 6, 2012

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-hawthorne-legacy-a-reassessment-of-the-impact-of-the-hawthorne-aBWhDDRz93
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1751-1348
DOI
10.1108/17511341211188682
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – This paper seeks to analyze the contribution that the Hawthorne studies made to the discipline of management. The recent scholarly trend has been to attack the Hawthorne studies on the grounds of methodology and originality. However, the only way to accurately view the Hawthorne studies is to recreate the intellectual environment in which the studies were conducted. Why did this version of human relations rather than Dennison's or Williams's emerge as the scholarly contribution? Design/methodology/approach – Both primary and secondary sources were utilized in the research. The focus was from the time period of 1930 to 1958. More contemporary work was considered as well. Findings – Contemporary scholars viewed Hawthorne as being more thorough and complete than previous work. They also viewed the study as a contribution in light of some methodological issues and political biases. Practical implications – Performing temporal analysis allows the perceived strengths and weaknesses of scholarly works to become more apparent. Originality/value – Previous accounts of the Hawthorne studies have mostly studied their impact on practitioners. This study examines the impact on scholars.

Journal

Journal of Management HistoryEmerald Publishing

Published: Jan 6, 2012

Keywords: Hawthorne studies; Historical manuscripts; Management history; Management techniques; Management research

References