Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Ferrario
Women as managerial leaders
D. Karpin
Enterprising Nation
Jennifer Berdahl (1996)
Gender and leadership in work groups: Six alternative modelsLeadership Quarterly, 7
Tricia Vilkinas, Greg Cartan (1997)
How different are the roles displayed by female and male managersWomen in Management Review, 12
M. Owen
Women fill senior jobs
B.R. Ragins, E. Sundstrom
Gender and power in organisations
M.A. Dalton
Using 360‐degree feedback successfully
C. Milne
Advertiser
R. Hooijberg, R. Quinn (1992)
Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers.
A. Furnham, Paul Stringfield (1998)
Congruence in Job-Performance Ratings: A Study of 360° Feedback Examining Self, Manager, Peers, and Consultant RatingsHuman Relations, 51
J. Rosener
Women: a competitive secret
B. Ragins (1991)
Gender effects in subordinate evaluations of leaders: Real or artifact?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 12
Andrew Korac-Kakabadse, N. Korac-Kakabadse, A. Myers (1998)
Demographics and leadership philosophy: exploring gender differencesJournal of Management Development, 17
J. Church (2001)
Human Development ReportJournal of Government Information, 28
R. Quinn, S. Faerman, M. Thompson, M. McGrath
Becoming a Master Manager
Patrice Rosenthal, D. Guest, R. Peccei (1996)
Gender differences in managers' causal explanations for their work performance: A study in two organizationsJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69
D. Denison, R. Hooijberg, R. Quinn (1995)
Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial LeadershipOrganization Science, 6
B. Bass, B. Avolio, L. Atwater (1996)
The Transformational and Transactional Leadership of Men and WomenApplied Psychology, 45
Tricia Vilkinas, Greg Cartan (2001)
The behavioural control room for managers: the integrator roleLeadership & Organization Development Journal, 22
Y.D. Billing, M. Alvesson
Gender, Managers and Organisations
R. O’Neill, R. Quinn (1993)
Editors' note: Applications of the competing values frameworkHuman Resource Management, 32
Ellen Fagenson (1990)
At the heart of women in management research: Theoretical and methodological approaches and their biasesJournal of Business Ethics, 9
D. Greatorex, T. Holden, J. Iliffe, B. Wauchope
Corporate Collapses: Lessons for the Future
D. Bhatnagar, R. Swamy (1995)
Attitudes Toward Women as Managers: Does Interaction Make a Difference?Human Relations, 48
J. Rosener (1990)
Ways women lead.Harvard business review, 68 6
S. Hart, R. Quinn (1993)
Roles Executives Play: CEOs, Behavioral Complexity, and Firm PerformanceHuman Relations, 46
Linda, Wirth (2003)
Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling: Women in Management
B. Alimo‐Metcalfe (1998)
360 Degree Feedback and Leadership DevelopmentInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6
Phyllis Tharenou, S. Latimer, Denise Conroy (1994)
How do you Make it to the Top? An Examination of Influences on Women's and Men's Managerial AdvancementAcademy of Management Journal, 37
R. Quinn (1991)
Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance
R.M. O’Neill, R.E. Quinn
Applications of the competing values framework
J. Wajcman (1996)
Desperately Seeking Differences: Is Management Style Gendered?British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34
B. Ragins, E. Sundstrom (1989)
Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 105
E. Fagenson
At the heart of women in management research
Q. Willis, S. Petzall
Leadership Styles of Australian and International Managers
Robert Quinn's competing values framework identified eight managerial roles that managers must display if they are to be effective. The eight roles are innovator, broker, producer, director, co-ordinator, monitor, facilitator and mentor. In this study 509 managers, 127 of whom were females, responded to a survey exploring the extent to which they displayed each of Quinn's managerial roles. Each managers' staff were asked to respond to the questionnaire. When the gender of the managers and that of their significant others (staff, peers and boss) was taken into account there was no significant difference reported in the extent to which the eight roles were displayed nor the effectiveness level of male and female managers. The results of this study indicate that the gender of the manager does not impact on how they are perceived by their significant others. Rather it is how effective they are as managers that determines their significant others' perceptions.
Women in Management Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 1, 2000
Keywords: Effectiveness; Women; Management roles
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.