Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Li‐teh Sun (1992)
SELF‐MODIFICATION AS THE BASIS FOR AN ETHICAL ECONOMIC ORDERHumanomics, 8
陳 志譲, 毛 沢東, M. Bullock (1966)
Mao and the Chinese RevolutionPolitical Science Quarterly, 81
Yat-sen Sun, F. Price (1981)
The three principles of the people
J. Byron, R. Pack (1992)
The Claws of the Dragon: Kang Sheng - The Evil Genius Behind Mao - And His Legacy of Terror in People's China
D. Cattell, S. Schram (1964)
The Political Thought of Mao Tse-TungInternational Journal, 19
James Legge (2004)
The Li Ki
Young-tsu Wong (1992)
All Under Heaven: Sun Yat-Sen and His Revolutionary ThoughtThe Journal of Asian Studies, 51
P. Brocheux, M. Bergere (1995)
Sun Yat SenVingtieme Siecle-revue D Histoire
W. Franke (1967)
China and the West
Clark J.B. (1914)
10.1525/9780520348448
J. Stoessinger (1971)
Nations in darkness: China, Russia, and America
Elisabeth Braun (1972)
John G. Stoessinger. Nations in darkness : China, Russia and America. Nueva York : Random House, 1971, 13
R. Baum, Louise Bennett (1971)
China in Ferment: Perspectives on the Cultural Revolution
Rodney Clark (1979)
The Japanese Company
J. Clark
Social Justice Without Socialism
Gaye Christoffersen, H. Tai (1991)
Confucianism and Economic Development: An Oriental Alternative?The Journal of Asian Studies, 50
Li‐teh Sun (1986)
Confucianism and the Economic Order of TaiwanInternational Journal of Social Economics, 13
A Soviet type of shock therapy is not likely to takeplace in China since a gradual economic reform has already improved theoverall economic conditions. Argues that, for further economicdevelopment, however, the Chinese communists must recognize two basicfacts 1 Chinese communism has already fulfilled its historicalmission by expelling foreign imperialism and domestic feudalism 2Marxism and Leninism are of foreign origin. This recognition is able topave the way for a final adoption of the Taiwanese model of economicdevelopment, which is based on the ideas developed by Sun YatSen, whohad never stopped to insist that modernization should not abandon theChinese tradition, especially Confucianism.
International Journal of Social Economics – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.