Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The futile fight against (human) nature A public choice analysis of the US Army Corps of Engineers – special focus on Hurricane Katrina

The futile fight against (human) nature A public choice analysis of the US Army Corps of... Purpose – The paper aims to discuss bureaucratic management, over‐confidence in scientific theory, information distortion and lack of coordination with particular focus on the post‐Hurricane Katrina situation. Design/methodology/approach – The paper examines efficiency arguments for centralized control and the potential for government failure. It also analyzes the disaster of Hurricane Katrina with these problems in mind. Findings – The Flood Act of 1928 officially transferred the responsibility of flood protection along the Mississippi River to the federal government. While it is true that local provision failed to eliminate the problem of flooding, the problems caused by federal provision have not been fully appreciated. The specific characteristics of flood protection as well as the general problems caused by bureaucratic management and the absence of market mechanisms suggest that local provision of flood protection is a more efficient solution. Originality/value – The arguments in this paper suggest that, the previous belief in centralized flood management was unfounded. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Social Economics Emerald Publishing

The futile fight against (human) nature A public choice analysis of the US Army Corps of Engineers – special focus on Hurricane Katrina

International Journal of Social Economics , Volume 35 (8): 12 – Jul 4, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-futile-fight-against-human-nature-a-public-choice-analysis-of-the-l9FG8T5vIA
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0306-8293
DOI
10.1108/03068290810889242
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The paper aims to discuss bureaucratic management, over‐confidence in scientific theory, information distortion and lack of coordination with particular focus on the post‐Hurricane Katrina situation. Design/methodology/approach – The paper examines efficiency arguments for centralized control and the potential for government failure. It also analyzes the disaster of Hurricane Katrina with these problems in mind. Findings – The Flood Act of 1928 officially transferred the responsibility of flood protection along the Mississippi River to the federal government. While it is true that local provision failed to eliminate the problem of flooding, the problems caused by federal provision have not been fully appreciated. The specific characteristics of flood protection as well as the general problems caused by bureaucratic management and the absence of market mechanisms suggest that local provision of flood protection is a more efficient solution. Originality/value – The arguments in this paper suggest that, the previous belief in centralized flood management was unfounded.

Journal

International Journal of Social EconomicsEmerald Publishing

Published: Jul 4, 2008

Keywords: Centralized control; United States of America; Disasters; Floods

There are no references for this article.