Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Fakegate scandal

The Fakegate scandal Although ethics are frequently debated within the social marketing literature, there has been very little empirical study of deliberate ethical transgressions in promoting a good cause. The current study therefore aims to contribute by examining public reaction to the Fakegate scandal involving a climate scientist’s use of ethically questionable tactics in the “selling” of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) cause.Design/methodology/approachContent analysis catalogues the Fakegate justifications and criticisms used by eight UK and US print media editorials and 1,010 associated reader comments.FindingsAmong the argument classification categories, the most common Fakegate justifications rely on a utilitarian “greater good” ethics perspective, while the most frequent criticisms rely on a normative “violation of rules” ethics perspective. AGW believers represent nearly all the scandal justifiers, while AGW skeptics and a substantial minority of AGW believers represent the critics.Research limitations/implicationsContent material is limited to only the Fakegate case and people with enough interest to contribute a relevant comment, although the expressed viewpoints may be more widely representative because they are generally consistent with findings from the AGW public opinion polls.Originality/valueThis study provides an understanding of the ethical dilemma that social marketers face when assigned a “difficult-to-sell” good cause. The findings of the widespread public skepticism toward the AGW cause suggest that social marketers should resist the temptation of using ethically questionable tactics in such difficult cases. Unfortunately, honest and effective AGW “selling” may be impossible until current technology and policy tradeoffs are reduced. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Social Marketing Emerald Publishing

The Fakegate scandal

Olson, Erik L.
Journal of Social Marketing , Volume 8 (3): 17 – Jul 23, 2018
Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-fakegate-scandal-ZjsJUyDJG1
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
2042-6763
DOI
10.1108/jsocm-04-2017-0030
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Although ethics are frequently debated within the social marketing literature, there has been very little empirical study of deliberate ethical transgressions in promoting a good cause. The current study therefore aims to contribute by examining public reaction to the Fakegate scandal involving a climate scientist’s use of ethically questionable tactics in the “selling” of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) cause.Design/methodology/approachContent analysis catalogues the Fakegate justifications and criticisms used by eight UK and US print media editorials and 1,010 associated reader comments.FindingsAmong the argument classification categories, the most common Fakegate justifications rely on a utilitarian “greater good” ethics perspective, while the most frequent criticisms rely on a normative “violation of rules” ethics perspective. AGW believers represent nearly all the scandal justifiers, while AGW skeptics and a substantial minority of AGW believers represent the critics.Research limitations/implicationsContent material is limited to only the Fakegate case and people with enough interest to contribute a relevant comment, although the expressed viewpoints may be more widely representative because they are generally consistent with findings from the AGW public opinion polls.Originality/valueThis study provides an understanding of the ethical dilemma that social marketers face when assigned a “difficult-to-sell” good cause. The findings of the widespread public skepticism toward the AGW cause suggest that social marketers should resist the temptation of using ethically questionable tactics in such difficult cases. Unfortunately, honest and effective AGW “selling” may be impossible until current technology and policy tradeoffs are reduced.

Journal

Journal of Social Marketing – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 23, 2018

Keywords: Global warming; Climate change; Fakegate; Greater good; Social marketing ethics; Tradeoffs

References

  • Marketing social marketing in the social change marketplace
    Andreasen, A.R.
  • A ZMET-based analysis of perceptions of climate change among young South Koreans, implications for social marketing communications
    Anghelcev, G.; Chung, M.Y.; Sar, S.; Duff, B.R.L.
  • 25 years of predicting the global warming ‘tipping point’
    Bastasch, M.
  • Here’s why trump won big in coal country
    Bastasch, M.
  • Factors potentially affecting the successful promotion of electric vehicles
    Bennett, R.; Kottasz, R.; Shaw, S.
  • Ethical challenges of social marketing
    Brenkert, G.G.
  • The social justice of coal
    Bryce, R.
  • Q&A: ‘Climategate
    Carrington, D.
  • The greens versus ‘big oil
    Cook, R.
  • The legacy of Climategate: 5 years later
    Curry, J.
  • Climate heretic: to be or not to be?
    Curry, J.
  • UN poll shows climate change is the lowest of all global concerns
    Delingpole, J.
  • Americans most likely to say global warming is exaggerated
    Dugan, A.
  • Would you want your granddaughter to Marry a Taiwanese marketing man?
    Farmer, R.N.
  • A greater means to the greater good: ethical guidelines to meet social movement organization advocacy challenges
    Freeman, C.P.
  • A perfect moral storm: Climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption
    Gardiner, S.M.
  • Peter Gleick lied, but was it justified for the wider good?
    Garvey, J.
  • The origin of the heartland documents
    Gleick, P.H.
  • Peter Gleick reinstated by pacific institute following heartland expose
    Goldenberg, S.
  • A framework for sustainable marketing
    Gordon, R.; Carrigan, M.; Hastings, G.
  • Policy greenhouse gas emission
  • Saving the earth, one fraud at a time
    Greenhut, S.
  • Climategate’ and the scientific ethos
    Grundmann, R.
  • Global trends 2014 environment survey
  • Women’s bodies as sites of control: Inadvertent stigma and exclusion in social marketing
    Gurrieri, L.; Previte, J.; Brace-Govan, J.
  • Questions and answers: Emission reductions needed to stablilize climate
    Hassol, S.J.
  • Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern
    Hastings, G.B.; Stead, M.; Webb, J.
  • Green on the outside, red on the inside: Perceived environmentalist threat as a factor explaining political polarization of climate change
    Hoffarth, M.R.; Hodson, G.
  • Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate
    Hoffman, A.J.
  • Public health marketing – is it good and is it good for everyone?
    Holden, S.S.; Cox, D.
  • Should global-warming activists lie to defend their cause?
    Horgan, J.
  • Geoengineering and climate change polarization: Testing a two-channel model of science communication
    Kahan, D.M.; Jenkins-Smith, H.; Tarantola, T.; Silva, C.L.; Braman, D.
  • Pro-environmental behaviors for thee but not for me: Green giants, green gods, and external environmental locus of control
    Kalamas, M.; Cleveland, M.; Laroche, M.
  • Content analysis in consumer research
    Kassarjian, H.
  • Climate change and ‘climategate’ in online reader comments: a mixed methods study
    Koteyko, N.; Jaspal, R.; Nerlich, B.
  • Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative
    Kotler, P.
  • Peter Gleick, The Heartland Revelations and Situational Journalism
    Laden, G.
  • Reports of heartland’s demise are greatly exaggerated
    Lakely, J.
  • A health equity critique of social marketing: where interventions have impact but insufficient reach
    Langford, R.; Panter-Brick, C.
  • Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust
    Leiserowitz, A.A.; Maibach, E.W.; Roser-Renouf, C.; Smith, N.; Dawson, E.
  • The morality of unmasking heartland
    Lewandowsky, S.
  • Someday, electric cars will be great
    Lomborg, B.
  • Trump cuts show Paris treaty is paper tiger
    Lomborg, B.
  • The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference
    Luchs, M.G.; Naylor, R.W.; Irwin, J.R.; Raghunathan, R.
  • Peter Gleick confesses to obtaining heartland documents under false pretenses
    McArdle, M.
  • The normative structure of science
    Merton, R.K.; Merton, R.K.
  • The grand exaggerator
    Michaels, P.J.
  • Taking on ‘GlacierGate’, the latest climate science scandal
    Mooney, C.
  • Embarrassing predictions haunt the global-warming industry
    Newman, A.
  • Ethical evaluation segmentation in social marketing
    Newton, J.; Newton, F.J.; Turk, T.; Ewing, M.T.
  • The phony war against CO2
    Nichols, R.W.; Schmidt, H.H.
  • How magazines portrayed advertising: 1900-1940
    Olson, E.L.
  • It’s not easy being green: the effects of attribute tradeoffs on green product preference and choice
    Olson, E.L.
  • Perspective: the green innovation value chain: a tool for evaluating the diffusion prospects of green products
    Olson, E.L.
  • Green innovation value chain analysis of PV solar power
    Olson, E.L.
  • Green innovation value chain frame of comparison: Market and public policy implications
    Olson, E.L.
  • The financial and environmental costs and benefits for Norwegian electric car subsidies: Are they good public policy?
    Olson, E.L.
  • The rationalization and persistence of organic food beliefs in the face of contrary evidence
    Olson, E.L.
  • The Solyndra case: an institutional economics perspective on the optimal role of government support for green technology development
    Olson, E.L.; Biong, H.
  • Fear won’t do it’, promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representation
    O’Neil, S.; Nicholson-Cole, S.
  • The four ES of social marketing: ethicality, expensiveness, exaggeration, and effectiveness
    Pang, B.; Kubacki, K.
  • Global warming: follow the money
    Payne, H.
  • My unhappy life as a climate heretic
    Pielke, R.
  • Peter Gleick admits deception in obtaining heartland climate files
    Revkin, A.C.
  • Hundreds of scientists UGE trump to withdraw from U.N. climate-change agency
    Richardson, V.
  • Climate change not a top worry in the US
    Riffkin, R.
  • A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change
    Rogers, R.W.
  • Climate change: a profile of US climate scientist’s perspectives
    Rosenberg, S.; Vedlitz, A.; Cowman, D.F.; Zahran, S.
  • A skeptic looks at alternative energy
    Smil, V.
  • Some reasonable but uncomfortable questions about social marketing
    Spotswood, F.; French, J.; Tapp, A.; Stead, M.
  • Trump’s anti-climate crusade can still be stopped
    Suh, R.
  • A human rights-based approach to the social good in social marketing
    Szablewska, N.; Kubacki, K.
  • In defense of peter Gleick, muckraker
    Tobis, M.
  • Fake but accurate’ science
    Tracinski, R.
  • Skeptical climate scientists coming in from the cold
    Varney, J.
  • Social negative option marketing, a partial response to one of Spotswood, French, Tapp and steads (2012) “uncomfortable questions
    Von Bergen, C.W.; Miles, M.P.