Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/the-evolution-of-the-performance-appraisal-process-qZlrHsxoXz
References (64)
-
K. Murphy, Carmen Martin, Magda Garcia (1982)
Do behavioral observation scales measure observationJournal of Applied Psychology, 67
-
W. Cascio (1978)
Applied psychology in personnel management -
T. Patten (1977)
Pay: Employee compensation and incentive plans -
M.W. Richardson
Forced‐choice performance reports: a modern merit‐rating method -
J.D. Hackett
Rating legislators -
E. Sisson (1948)
Forced Choice—The New Army Rating1Personnel Psychology, 1
-
H. Levinson
Management by whose objectives -
L.D. White
The Jacksonians -
H. Bernardin, M. Buckley (1981)
Strategies in Rater TrainingAcademy of Management Review, 6
-
Sterling Spero, P. Riper (1959)
History of the United States civil service -
C. Bonjean, R. Likert (1963)
New Patterns of Management.Social Forces, 42
-
G.P. Latham, K.N. Wexley
Behavioral observation scales -
K. Murphy, J. Constans (1987)
Behavioral anchors as a source of bias in ratingJournal of Applied Psychology, 72
-
P. Benson, M. Buckley, S. Hall (1988)
The Impact of Rating Scale Format on Rater Accuracy: An Evaluation of the Mixed Standard ScaleJournal of Management, 14
-
Hay Associates
Accent on appraisal -
P. Smith, L. Kendall (1963)
Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales.Journal of Applied Psychology, 47
-
W.D. Scott, R.C. Clothier
Personnel Management: Principles, Practices, and Points of View -
P. Drucker, 齐 若兰, 那 国毅 (1954)
管理的实践=The practice of management -
J. Berkshire, Richard Highland (1953)
Forced-Choice Performance Rating—A Methodological Study*Personnel Psychology, 6
-
10.2307/255669
-
J.G. Goodale
Behaviorally‐based rating scales: toward an integrated approach to performance appraisal -
Richard Guzzo, Richard Jette, R. Katzell (1985)
The Effects of Psychologically Based Intervention Programs on Worker Productivity: A Meta-Analysis.Personnel Psychology, 38
-
10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.72
-
F.M. Lopez
Evaluating Employee Performance -
G. Latham, K. Wexley (1977)
BEHAVIORAL OBSERVATION SCALES FOR PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PURPOSESPersonnel Psychology, 30
-
H.J. Bernardin, E.C. Pence
Rater training: creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy -
D. Wren (1987)
The evolution of management thought -
R.E. Kopelman
Objective feedback -
J. Cleveland, K. Murphy, Richard Williams (1989)
Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates.Journal of Applied Psychology, 74
-
10.5465/256219
-
J. Newman, D. Devries, A. Morrison, S. Shullman, Michael Gerlach (1981)
Performance Appraisal on the Line -
D. Mcgregor, Marilyn Smith (1975)
An Uneasy Look at Performance AppraisalJONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 5
-
R. Bellows (1954)
Employment psychology; the interview -
F. Landy, J. Farr, R. Jacobs (1982)
Utility concepts in performance measurementOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30
-
Friedrich Blanz, E. Ghiselli (1972)
THE MIXED STANDARD SCALE: A NEW RATING SYSTEMPersonnel Psychology, 25
-
L. Gómez‐Mejía (1988)
Evaluating employee performance: Does the appraisal instrument make a difference?Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 9
-
Emil Mesics, T. Whisler, Shirley Harper (1963)
Performance Appraisal: Research and Practice.Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 16
-
W.R. Spriegel
Company practices in appraisal of managerial performance -
J. Flanagan (1954)
The critical incident technique.Psychological bulletin, 51 4
-
H. Bernardin, R. Beatty (1984)
Performance appraisal : assessing human behavior at work -
P.F. Drucker
The Practice of Management -
Daniel Ilgen, J. Barnes-Farrell, D. McKellin (1993)
Performance Appraisal Process Research in the 1980s: What Has It Contributed to Appraisals in Use?Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54
-
W.D. Scott, R.C. Clothier, W.R. Spriegel
Personnel Management -
D. Schwab, H. Heneman, T. DeCotiis (1975)
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales: A Review of the Literature.Personnel Psychology, 28
-
F.J. Landy, J.L. Farr
Performance rating -
D.B. Fedor
Recipient respounses to performance feedback: a proposed model and its implications -
A.F. Kindall, J. Gatza
Positive program for performance appraisal -
W.B. Graves
Efficiency rating systems: their history, organization and functioning -
K. Murphy, J. Cleveland (1995)
Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives -
K.R. Murphy, J.I. Constans
Psychological issues in scale format research: Behavioral anchors as a source of bias in rating -
F.A. Petrie
Is there something new in efficiency rating? -
R. Benjamin, Jr
A survey of 130 merit‐rating plans -
J.S. Kane, E.E. Lawler
Performance appraisal effectiveness: its assessment and determinants -
Thomas Kleber (1972)
Forty common goal‐setting errorsHuman Resource Management, 11
-
F.J. Landy, J.L. Farr
The Measurement of Work Performance: Methods, Theory, and Applications -
C. Schneier, R. Beatty (1978)
The Influence Of Role Prescriptions On The Performance Appraisal ProcessAcademy of Management Journal, 21
-
10.2307/257876
-
M. Mcconkie (1979)
A Clarification of the Goal Setting And Appraisal Processes in MBOAcademy of Management Review, 4
-
H. Bernardin, Earl Pence (1980)
Effects of rater training: Creating new response sets and decreasing accuracy.Journal of Applied Psychology, 65
-
R.A. Guzzo, R.D. Jette, R.A. Katzell
The effects of psychologically‐based intervention programs on worker productivity -
S. Ashford (1986)
Feedback-Seeking in Individual Adaptation: A Resource PerspectiveAcademy of Management Journal, 29
-
F. Landy (1983)
The measurement of work performance : methods, theory and applications / Frank J. Landy, James L. Farr, 1983
-
H. Meyer, E. Kay, J. French (1981)
Split Roles in Performance AppraisalHarvard Business Review
-
C. Fombrun, N. Tichy, Mary Devanna (1984)
Strategic Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1998 MCB UP Ltd. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 1355-252X
- DOI
- 10.1108/13552529810231003
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The performance appraisal process has been the focus of much researcher and practitioner attention. In spite of this attention, methods used in performance appraisal are generally ineffective in increasing the quality of performance appraisal processes. Thus, while performance appraisal processes have evolved, progress has been less forthcoming. There are many areas related to the performance appraisal process which are ripe for development and research creativity.
Journal
Journal of Management History (Archive) – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 1, 1998
Keywords: Performance; Performance appraisal