Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Spendolini (1992)
The Benchmarking Book
Great Comptroller (1999)
The PFI contract for the new Dartford and Gravesham Hospital
R. Camp (1989)
Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance
C. Warwick (1998)
The new NHS: modern dependableThe British Journal of Midwifery, 6
A. Bendell, L. Boulter, Paul Goodstadt (1993)
Benchmarking for Competitive Advantage
J. Holloway, Graham Francis, Matthew Hinton, David Mayle (1998)
Best practice benchmarking: Delivering the goods?Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 9
Jeffrey Dorsch, M. Yasin (1998)
A framework for benchmarking in the public sectorInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 11
J. Cox, L. Mann, D. Samson (1997)
BENCHMARKING AS A MIXED METAPHOR: DISENTANGLING ASSUMPTIONS OF COMPETITION AND COLLABORATION*Journal of Management Studies, 34
E. Abrahamson
Management fashion
J. Glynn, M. Murphy (1996)
Public management: Failing accountabilities and failing performance reviewInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 9
M. Geddes, Steven Martin (2000)
The policy and politics of Best Value: currents, crosscurrents and undercurrents in the new regimePolicy and Politics, 28
Matthew Hinton, Graham Francis, J. Holloway (2000)
Best practice benchmarking in the UKBenchmarking: An International Journal, 7
Mary Bowerman, A. Ball, Graham Francis (2001)
Benchmarking as a Tool for the Modernisation of Local GovernmentFinancial Accountability and Management, 17
Harlow Cohen (1998)
The performance paradoxAcademy of Management Perspectives, 12
Patrick Dunleavy, C. Hood (1994)
From old public administration to new public managementPublic Money & Management, 14
Mary Bowerman, A. Ball (2000)
The Modernisation and Importance of Government and Public Services: Great Expectations: Benchmarking for Best ValuePublic Money & Management, 20
R. Camp (1995)
Business process benchmarking : finding and implementing best practices
J. Holloway, Matthew Hinton, Graham Francis, David Mayle (2000)
Identifying Best Practice in Benchmarking
Mary Bowerman, A. Ball (2000)
Great Expectations: Benchmarking for Best Value
J. Holloway, Graham Francis, Matthew Hinton (1999)
A vehicle for change?: A case study of performance improvement in the “new” public sectorInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 12
M. Henkel (1990)
Government, evaluation, and change
Barry Povey (1997)
Benchmarking: A tool for continuous improvementTechnovation, 17
Mary Bowerman, H. Raby, C. Humphrey (2000)
In Search of the Audit Society: Some Evidence from Health Care, Police and SchoolsInternational Journal of Auditing, 4
A. Ball, Mary Bowerman, Shirley Hawksworth (2000)
Benchmarking in local government under a central government agendaBenchmarking: An International Journal, 7
P. Davis (1998)
The burgeoning of benchmarking in British local government: The value of “learning by looking” in the public services, 5
C. Humphrey, P. Miller, R. Scapens (1993)
Accountability and Accountable Management in the UK Public SectorAccounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 6
Stuart Burchell, C. Clubb, A. Hopwood, J. Hughes, Janine Nahapiet (1980)
The roles of accounting in organizations and societyAccounting Organizations and Society, 5
M. Radford (1991)
Auditing for Change: Local Government and the Audit CommissionModern Law Review, 54
Explores issues surrounding the recent evolution of benchmarking in the UK public sector with particular regard to local authorities. Argues that what is being done in the name of benchmarking in UK local authorities is fundamentally different to the current understanding of benchmarking practice in the private sector. Despite these differences, and somewhat ironically, the development of benchmarking in the public sector pre‐dates its popularity in the private sector. In the public sector, benchmarking is frequently in response to central government requirements, or is used for defensive reasons rather than striving for performance gains. These themes are captured in two new benchmarking typologies: compulsory and voluntary models of benchmarking. Concludes that: the reasons for benchmarking in the public sector are confused; pressures for accountability in the public sector may militate against real performance improvement; and an appropriate balance between the use of benchmarking for control and improvement purposes is yet to be achieved.
Benchmarking: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 2002
Keywords: Benchmarking; Value; Performance measurement; Local government
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.